Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

i-com

Journal of Interactive Media

Editor-in-Chief: Ziegler, Jürgen

3 Issues per year

Online
ISSN
2196-6826
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 15, Issue 3

Issues

Introduction to this Special Issue on “Human-Machine Interaction and Cooperation in Safety-Critical Systems”

Tilo Mentler
  • Corresponding author
  • University of Luebeck – Institute for Multimedia and Interactive Systems, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Christian Reuter / Stefan Geisler
Published Online: 2016-12-09 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2016-0037

Abstract

Mission- and safety-critical domains are more and more characterized by interactive and multimedia systems varying from large-scale technologies (e. g. airplanes) to wearable devices (e. g. smartglasses) operated by professional staff or volunteering laypeople. While technical availability, reliability and security of computer-based systems are of utmost importance, outcomes and performances increasingly depend on sufficient human-machine interaction or even cooperation to a large extent. While this i-com Special Issue on “Human-Machine Interaction and Cooperation in Safety-Critical Systems” presents recent research results from specific application domains like aviation, automotive, crisis management and healthcare, this introductory paper outlines the diversity of users, technologies and interaction or cooperation models involved.

Keywords: Safety-critical Systems; Human-machine Interaction; Human-machine Cooperation; Usability; Risk Management; Automation; Responsibility; Trust

References

  • [1]

    ALTOM, T.: Usability as risk management. In: interactions Bd. 14 (2007), Nr. 2, S. 16–17.Google Scholar

  • [2]

    COHEN, P. R.; MCGEE, D. R.: Tangible multimodal interfaces for safety-critical applications. In: Communications of the ACM Bd. 47 (2004), Nr. 1, S. 41.Google Scholar

  • [3]

    COSKUN, E.; GRABOWSKI, M.: Impacts of User Interface Complexity on User Acceptance and Performance in Safety-Critical Systems. In: Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management Bd. 2 (2005), Nr. 1.Google Scholar

  • [4]

    DAHL, Y.; ALSOS, O.; SVANÆS, D.: Evaluating Mobile Usability: The Role of Fidelity in Full-Scale Laboratory Simulations with Mobile ICT for Hospitals. Human-Computer Interaction. New Trends. Human-Computer Interaction. New Trends. In: JACKO, J. A. (Hrsg.): Human-Computer Interaction. New Trends. 5610. Aufl. Berlin: Springer, 2009, S. 232–241.Google Scholar

  • [5]

    DYNES, R. R.: Social Capital: Dealing with Community Emergencies. In: Homeland Security Affairs Bd. 2 (2006), Nr. 2.Google Scholar

  • [6]

    EIMLER, S. C.; GEISLER, S.: Zur Akzeptanz Autonomen Fahrens – Eine A-Priori Studie. In: WEISBECKER, A.; BURMESTER, M.; SCHMIDT, A. (Hrsg.): Mensch und Computer 2015 – Workshopband. Berlin: De Gruyter Oldenbourg, 2015, S. 533–540.Google Scholar

  • [7]

    ENDSLEY, M. R.: Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. In: Human Factors Bd. 37 (1995), Nr. 1, S. 32–64.Google Scholar

  • [8]

    FLEMISCH, F.; BALTZER, M.; ALTENDORF, E.; LÓPEZ, D.; RUDOLPH, C.: Kooperativität und Arbitrierung versus Autonomie: Grundsätzliche Überlegungen zur kooperativen Automation mit anschaulichen Beispielen. In: DEUTSCHE GESELLSCHAFT FÜR LUFT- UND RAUMFAHRT – LILIENTHAL-OBERT E. V. (Hrsg.): 57. Fachausschusssitzung Anthropotechnik der DGLR: Kooperation und kooperative Systeme in der Fahrzeug- und Prozessführung. Bonn, Germany, 2016, S. 1–14.Google Scholar

  • [9]

    GALLIERS, J.; SUTCLIFFE, A.; MINOCHA, S.: An impact analysis method for safety-critical user interface design. In: ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Bd. 6 (1999), Nr. 4, S. 341–369.Google Scholar

  • [10]

    GESELLSCHAFT FÜR INFORMATIK E. V.: Die Grand Challenges der Informatik. URL https://www.gi.de/fileadmin/redaktion/Download/GI-Grand_Challenges-Brosch%C3%BCre2014.pdf.

  • [11]

    HEINTZ, A.; EIßFELDT, H.; CONZELMANN, K.: Empirische Validierung der Auswahl und Ausbildung von Fluglotsen für die DFS. In: GRANDT, M.; SCHMERWITZ, S. (Hrsg.): 55. Fachausschusssitzung Anthropotechnik der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Luft- und Raumfahrt Lilienthal-Oberth e. V. Ausbildung & Training in der Fahrzeug- und Prozessführung. Bonn: DGLR e. V., 2013, S. 61–70.Google Scholar

  • [12]

    HELSLOOT, IRA; RUITENBERG, A: Citizen Response to Disasters : a Survey of Literature and Some Practical Implications. In: Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management Bd. 12 (2004), Nr. 3, S. 98–111.Google Scholar

  • [13]

    HENNECKEN, B.; WITT, O.; SCHWARZ, J.: Makro-Ergonomische Unterstützung in Operationszentralen der Deutschen Marine. In: ZIEGLER, J.; SCHMIDT, A. (Hrsg.): Mensch & Computer 2010: Interaktive Kulturen. München: Oldenbourg Verlag, 2010, S. 103–112.Google Scholar

  • [14]

    HERCZEG, M.: Prozessführungssysteme: Sicherheitskritische Mensch-Maschine-Systeme und interaktive Medien zur Überwachung und Steuerung von Prozessen in Echtzeit: De Gruyter, 2014.Google Scholar

  • [15]

    HOC, J. M.: From human-machine interaction to human-machine cooperation. In: Ergonomics Bd. 43 (2000), Nr. 7, S. 833–843.Google Scholar

  • [16]

    KJELDSKOV, J.; STAGE, J.: Designing the handheld maritime communicator. In: ARNOWITZ, J.; CHALMERS, A.; SWACK, T.; ANDERSON, R.; ZAPOLSKI, J. (Hrsg.): Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Designing for user experiences. New York: NY: ACM, 2003, S. 1–15.Google Scholar

  • [17]

    KNECHT, C.; MÜHLETHALER, C. ZIMMERMANN, J.; BINZ, S.; PAINADATH, R.; WÄFLER, T.: Vertrauen in die Automatisierung, fehlende Situation Awareness + Fertigkeitsverlust durch automatisierte Systeme – Eine subjektive Einschätzung aus der Linienpilotenperspektive. In: GRANDT, M.; S., S. (Hrsg.): 56. Fachausschusssitzung Anthropotechnik der DGLR: Der Mensch zwischen Automatisierung, Kompetenz und Verantwortung. Bonn: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Luft- und Raumfahrt – Lilienthal-Obert e. V., 2014, S. 215–230.Google Scholar

  • [18]

    KNIGHT, J. C.: Safety Critical Systems. Challenges and Directions. In: TRACZ, W.; MAGEE, J.; YOUNG, M. (Hrsg.): ICSE ’02: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Software Engineering. New York: NY: ACM, 2002, S. 547–550.Google Scholar

  • [19]

    LANZARA, G. F.: Ephemeral Organisations in Extreme Environments: emergence, strategy, extinction. In: Journal of Management Studies Bd. 20 (1983), Nr. 1, S. 71–95.Google Scholar

  • [20]

    LAUER, W.; JANß, A.; RADERMACHER, K: Risiken der Mensch-Computer-Interaktion im OP. In: KAIN, S.; STRUVE, D.; WANDKE, H. (Hrsg.): Workshop-Proceedings der Tagung Mensch & Computer 2009. Berlin: Logos-Verlag, 2009, S. 305–307.Google Scholar

  • [21]

    LEIFLER, O.: Combining Technical and Human-Centered Strategies for Decision Support in Command and Control – The ComPlan Approach. In: FRIEDRICH, F.; VAN DE WALLE, B. (Hrsg.): Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management ISCRAM 2008, 2008, S. 504–515.Google Scholar

  • [22]

    LEITNER, G.; AHLSTRÖM, D.; HITZ, M.: Usability of Mobile Computing in Emergency Response Systems – Lessons Learned and Future Directions. In: HOLZINGER, A. (Hrsg.): HCI and usability for medicine and health care. Third Symposium of the Workgroup Human-Computer Interaction and Usability Engineering of the Austrian Computer Society. Berlin: Springer, 2007, S. 241–254.Google Scholar

  • [23]

    LEUCHTER, S.; JÜRGENSOHN, T.: Situation Awareness – Training für Fluglotsenschüler. In: OBERQUELLE, H.; OPPERMANN, R.; KRAUSE, J. (Hrsg.): Mensch & Computer 2001: 1. Fachübergreifende Konferenz. Stuttgart: B. G. Teubner, 2011, S. 437–438.Google Scholar

  • [24]

    LEY, B.; LUDWIG, T.; PIPEK, V.; RANDALL, D.; REUTER, C.; WIEDENHOEFER, T.: Information and Expertise Sharing in Inter-Organizational Crisis Management. In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing (JCSCW) Bd. 23 (2014), Nr. 4–6, S. 347–387.Google Scholar

  • [25]

    LINDHOLM, C.; HÖST, M.: Introducing usability testing in the risk management process in software development. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Software Engineering in Health Care (SEHC ’13). Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE Press, 2013, S. 5–11.Google Scholar

  • [26]

    LORENZEN, D.: Risikokommunikation bei Naturkatastrophen – Ausgewählte Ergebnisse der Befragung im Herbst 2004: Universität Karlsruhe (TH), 2005.Google Scholar

  • [27]

    LUDWIG, T.; KOTTHAUS, C.; REUTER, C.; VAN DONGEN, S.; PIPEK, V.: Situated crowdsourcing during disasters: Managing the tasks of spontaneous volunteers through public displays. In: International Journal on Human-Computer Studies (IJHCS) Bd. inpress (2016).Google Scholar

  • [28]

    MAGRABI, F.: Using cognitive models to evaluate safety-critical interfaces in healthcare. In: CHI ’08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’08). New York: ACM, 2008, S. 3567–3572.Google Scholar

  • [29]

    MARTINIE, C.; PALANQUE, P.: Design, Development and Evaluation Challenges for Future Mobile User Interfaces in Safety-Critical Contexts. In: CAUCHARD, J.; LANDAY, J.; LI, Y. (Hrsg.): Proceeding FutureMobileUI ’15 Proceedings of the 2015 Workshop on Future Mobile User Interfaces. New York: ACM, 2015, S. 5–7.Google Scholar

  • [30]

    MENTLER, T.; HERCZEG, M.: Human Factors and Ergonomics in Mobile Computing for Emergency Medical Services. In: AHRAM, T.; KARWOWSKI, W.; MAREK, T. (Hrsg.): Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics AHFE, 2014, S. 4149–4160.Google Scholar

  • [31]

    MENTLER, T.; HERCZEG, M.: Interactive cognitive artifacts for enhancing situation awareness of incident commanders in mass casualty incidents. In: Journal of Interaction Science Bd. 3 (2015), Nr. 1, S. 109.Google Scholar

  • [32]

    MENTLER, T.; HERCZEG, M.: On the Role of User Experience in Mission- or Safety-Critical Systems. In: WEYERS, B.; DITTMAR, A. (Hrsg.): Mensch und Computer 2016 – Workshopband. Aachen: Gesellschaft für Informatik e. V., 2016.Google Scholar

  • [33]

    MENTLER, T.; KAPPEL, J.; WÜNSCH, L.; HERCZEG, M.: Photo-enriched Documentation during Surgeries with Google Glass: An Exploration Usability Study in a Department of Paediatric Surgery. In: i-com Bd. 15 (2016), S. 171–178.Google Scholar

  • [34]

    PALANQUE, P.; KOORNNEEF, F.; JOHNSON, C.; SZWILLUS, G.; WRIGHT, P.: Safety-critical interaction: usability in incidents and accidents. In: CHI ’04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’04). New York: ACM, 2004, S. 1600–1601.Google Scholar

  • [35]

    PFEIL, J.: Maßnahmen des Katastrophenschutzes und Reaktionen der Bürger in Hochwassergebieten. Bonn, Germany: Deutsches Komitee für Katastrophenvorsorge e. V. (DKKV), 2000 — ISBN 3933181194.Google Scholar

  • [36]

    ST. PIERRE, M.; HOFINGER, G.; BUERSCHAPER, C.: Crisis management in acute care settings. Human factors and team psychology in a high stakes environment. Berlin: Springer, 2008.Google Scholar

  • [37]

    QUARANTELLI, E. L.: Emergent Citizen Groups in Disaster Preparedness and Recovery Activities, University of Delaware, 1984.Google Scholar

  • [38]

    RASMUSSEN, J.: Strategies for State Identification and Diagnosis in Supervisory Control Tasks, and Design of Computer-Based Support Systems. In: ROUSE, W. B. (Hrsg.): Advances in Man-Machine Systems Research. Bd. 1, 1984, S. 139–193.Google Scholar

  • [39]

    REDMILL, F.; RAJAN, J.: Human factors in safety-critical systems. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1997.Google Scholar

  • [40]

    REUTER, C.: Emergent Collaboration Infrastructures: Technology Design for Inter-Organizational Crisis Management (Ph. D. Thesis). Siegen, Germany: Springer Gabler, 2014 — ISBN 978-3-658-08585-8.Google Scholar

  • [41]

    REUTER, CHRISTIAN; HEGER, OLIVER; PIPEK, VOLKMAR: Combining Real and Virtual Volunteers through Social Media. In: COMES, T.; FIEDRICH, F.; FORTIER, S.; GELDERMANN, J.; MÜLLER, T. (Hrsg.): Proceedings of the Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM). Baden-Baden, Germany, 2013, S. 780–790.Google Scholar

  • [42]

    REUTER, CHRISTIAN; LUDWIG, THOMAS; KOTTHAUS, CHRISTOPH; KAUFHOLD, MARC-ANDRÉ; RADZIEWSKI, ELMAR VON; PIPEK, VOLKMAR: Big Data in a Crisis? Creating Social Media Datasets for Emergency Management Research. In: i-com: Journal of Interactive Media Bd. 15 (2016), Nr. 3.Google Scholar

  • [43]

    REUTER, CHRISTIAN; LUDWIG, THOMAS; PIPEK, VOLKMAR: Ad Hoc Participation in Situation Assessment: Supporting Mobile Collaboration in Emergencies. In: ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (ToCHI) Bd. 21, ACM (2014), Nr. 5.Google Scholar

  • [44]

    REUTER, CHRISTIAN; MENTLER, TILO; GEISLER, STEFAN: Guest Editorial Preface: Special Issue on Human Computer Interaction in Critical Systems I: Citizen and Volunteers. In: International Journal of Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (IJISCRAM) Bd. 7 (2015), Nr. 2.Google Scholar

  • [45]

    REUTER, CHRISTIAN; PIPEK, VOLKMAR: Krisenkommunikation trainieren: Ein webgestützter Ansatz. In: WANDKE, H.; KAIN, S.; STRUVE, D. (Hrsg.): Mensch & Computer 2009: Grenzenlos frei?. Berlin, Germany: Oldenbourg-Verlag, 2009, S. 93–102.Google Scholar

  • [46]

    REUTER, CHRISTIAN; SPIELHOFER, THOMAS: Towards Social Resilience: A Quantitative and Qualitative Survey on Citizens’ Perception of Social Media in Emergencies in Europe. In: Journal Technological Forecasting and Social Change (TFSC) Bd. onlinefirs (2016).Google Scholar

  • [47]

    RITZ, F.; BRÜNGGER, J.; KLEINDIENST, C.: Teamtraining zur erfolgreichen Bewältigung unerwarteter und unbekannter sicherheitskritischer Situationen in Leitwarten. In: GRANDT, M.; SCHMERWITZ, S. (Hrsg.): 55. Fachausschusssitzung Anthropotechnik der DGLR: Ausbildung und Training in der Fahrzeug- und Prozessführung. Bonn: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Luft- und Raumfahrt – Lilienthal-Obert e. V., 2013, S. 1–12.Google Scholar

  • [48]

    SAE International: Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to on-road motor vehicle automated driving systems. Surface vehicle information report. Warrendale, Pa., 2014.Google Scholar

  • [49]

    SAVAGE-KNEPSHIELD, P. THOMAS, J.; PAULILLO, C.; DAVIS, J.; QUARLES, D.; MITCHELL, D.: Designing the User Experience for C4ISR Systems in the U. S. Army. In: MARCUS, A. (Hrsg.): Design, User Experience, and Usability. User Experience Design for Everyday Life Applications and Services. 8519. Aufl. Cham: Springer Internat, 2014, S. 338–346.Google Scholar

  • [50]

    SCHUBERT, E.; HASLBECK, A.: Gestaltungskriterien für Szenarien in Flugsimulatoren zur Untersuchung von Verhalten und Leistung von Verkehrspiloten. In: GRANDT, M.; SCHMERWITZ, S. (Hrsg.): 56. Fachausschusssitzung Anthropotechnik der DGLR: Der Mensch zwischen Automatisierung, Kompetenz und Verantwortung. Bonn: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Luft- und Raumfahrt – Lilienthal-Obert e. V., 2014, S. 125–137.Google Scholar

  • [51]

    SCHWARZ, T.; KEHR, F.; OORTMANN, H.; REITERER, H.: Die Leitwarte von heute verstehen – die Leitwarte von morgen gestalten! In: ZIEGLER, J.; SCHMIDT, A. (Hrsg.): Mensch & Computer 2010: Interaktive Kulturen. München: Oldenbourg Verlag, 2010, S. 93–102.Google Scholar

  • [52]

    STALLINGS, ROBERT A.; QUARANTELLI, ENRICO L. EL: Emergent Citizen Groups and Emergency Management. In: Public Administration Review Bd. 45 (1985), Nr. Special Issue, S. 93–100 — ISBN 00333352.Google Scholar

About the article

Tilo Mentler

Tilo Mentler, Christian Reuter and Stefan Geisler are founding members and members of the executive board of the special interest group “Human-Computer-Interaction in Safety-Critical Systems” within the technical committee “Human-Computer Interaction” of the German Informatics Society (GI).

Tilo Mentler is junior professor of safety-critical human-computer systems in technology and medicine at the Institute for Multimedia and Interactive Systems (IMIS) of the University of Luebeck. His main areas of interest are human-computer interaction in safety-critical contexts, usability engineering and interaction design of mobile and wearable devices. He is a founding member and vice-chairman of the section “HCI in Safety-Critical Systems” of the GI. Prof. Mentler is delegate of the GI to the IFIP Domain Committee on IT in Disaster Risk Reduction.

Christian Reuter

Christian Reuter is divisional director of crisis information systems at the Institute for Information Systems of the University of Siegen. He received a PhD for his work on (inter-)organizational collaboration technology design for crisis management. Before his scientific engagement he was full time consultant for a telecommunication corporation. He has acquired, conducted and managed national and international consultancy and research projects and has published about 85 scientific articles in information systems, human-computer interaction, crisis management and social media. He is voluntary founding chairman of the section “HCI in Safety-Critical Systems” of the GI.

Stefan Geisler

Stefan Geisler is Professor for Applied Computer Science and Human-Machine Interaction at Hochschule Ruhr West, University of Applied Sciences in Bottrop, Germany. After he received his Ph. D. from the Technical University Clausthal he worked for several years in the industry, at Ford Werke GmbH in Cologne. There he worked in different automotive HMI projects from research to serial development. 2010 he was offered a professorship. In his research he continues working on automotive HMI, but also on usability of different kinds of technology in times of demographic change (User Interfaces for Ambient Assisted Living systems) and for safety-critical systems. He is a founding member of the section “HCI in Safety-Critical Systems” of the GI.


Published Online: 2016-12-09

Published in Print: 2016-12-01


Citation Information: i-com, Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages 219–226, ISSN (Online) 2196-6826, ISSN (Print) 1618-162X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2016-0037.

Export Citation

© 2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in