Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

i-com

Journal of Interactive Media

Editor-in-Chief: Ziegler, Jürgen

Online
ISSN
2196-6826
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 17, Issue 2

Issues

The Crucial Role of Cultural Probes in Participatory Design for and with Older Adults

Susanne Maaß
  • Corresponding author
  • Universität Bremen, Fachbereich 3 Mathematik/Informatik, Bibliothekstr. 5, 28359, Bremen, Germany
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Sandra Buchmüller
  • Universität Bremen, Fachbereich 3 Mathematik/Informatik, Bibliothekstr. 5, 28359, Bremen, Germany
  • Technische Universität Braunschweig, Institut für Flugführung, Hermann-Blenk-Str. 27, 38108 Braunschweig, Germany
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2018-08-07 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2018-0015

Abstract

Software systems meant to support older adults often are not well accepted as they do not meet the expectations and requirements of the target group. An involvement of older adults in system design seems imperative. The project ParTec investigated and evaluated techniques for participatory software development with regard to their suitability for communication and equal cooperation with older adults. With a group of 15 retirees we developed concepts for an online neighbourhood platform. Using various participatory techniques researchers and participants developed a deep common understanding of everyday life in early retirement, determined requirements and co-created design ideas and concepts. We will show that the use of cultural probes with subsequent qualitative interviews forms an ideal starting point and a strong fundament for a participatory design process with older adults.

Keywords: software development; design for the elderly; participatory design; third space; cultural probes; interviews; personas; scenarios; prototyping; neighbourhood platform; online networks

References

  • [1]

    Boehner, K., Vertesi, J., Sengers, P. & Dourish, P. (2007). How HCI Interprets the Probes. In: Proc. CHI 2007, 1077–1086.Google Scholar

  • [2]

    Brandt, E., Binder, T., Malmborg, L. & Sokoler, T. (2010). Communities of everyday practice and situated elderliness as an approach to co-design for senior interaction. In: Proc. Oz CHI 2010, 400–403.Google Scholar

  • [3]

    Brandt, E., Binder, T. & Sanders, E. (2012). Tools and techniques: ways to engage telling, making and enacting. In: Simonsen, J. & Robertson, T. (Eds.). Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. London & New York: Routledge, 145–181.Google Scholar

  • [4]

    Cooper, A., Reimann, R., Cronin, D. & LeMoine, D. (2014). About Face. The Essentials of Interaction Design. Indianapolis: Wiley.Google Scholar

  • [5]

    Cooper, A. (1999). The inmates are running the Asylum. Why High-Tech Products Drive Us Crazy and How to Restore the Sanity. Indianapolis: Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • [6]

    Davidson, J. L. & Jensen, C. (2013). Participatory design with older adults: an analysis of creativity in the design of mobile healthcare applications. In: Proc. Creativity & Cognition 2013, 114–123.Google Scholar

  • [7]

    Denninger, T., van Dyk, S., Lessenich, S. & Richter, A. (2014). Leben im Ruhestand. Zur Neuverhandlung des Alters in der Aktivgesellschaft. Bielefeld: transcript.Google Scholar

  • [8]

    Dickinson, A., Arnott, J. & Prior, S. (2007). Methods for human – computer interaction research with older people. Behaviour & Information Technology, 26(4), 343–352.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [9]

    Fisk, A. D., Rogers, W. A., Charness, N., Czaja, S. J. & Sharit, J. (2009). Designing for older adults: Principles and creative human factors approaches. Boca Raton: CRC press.Google Scholar

  • [10]

    Gaver, W., Dunne, T. & Pacenti, T. (1999). Cultural Probes. Interactions, 6(1), 21–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [11]

    Generali (2013). Generali Altersstudie. Wie ältere Menschen leben, denken und sich engagieren. Frankfurt: Fischer.Google Scholar

  • [12]

    Graham, C., Rouncefield, C., Gibbs, M., Vetere, F. & Cheverst, K. (2007). How Probes Work. In: Proc. OzCHI 2007, 29–37.Google Scholar

  • [13]

    Grudin, J. & Pruitt, J. (2002). Personas, Participatory Design and Product Development: An Infrastructure for Engagement. In: Proc. PDC 2002, 144–152.Google Scholar

  • [14]

    Holtzblatt, K. & Beyer, H. (2016). Contextual design (Second edition). Cambridge: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar

  • [15]

    Jarke, J. & Gerhardt, U. (2018) Probes as Tool for Sharing (Tacit) Knowing: Perspective Making and Perspective Taking in Participatory Design. i-com. Journal of Interactive Media, 2018(2)—this issue.Google Scholar

  • [16]

    Johannson, M. & Messeter, J. (2005). Presenting the user, constructing the persona. Digital Creativity, 16(4), 231–243.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [17]

    Koch, D. (2017). Digitale Probes als Konzept in der Anforderungserhebung. Master Thesis, Department of Mathematics and Informatics, University of Bremen. Accessible under http://partec.informatik.uni-bremen.de/projekt/konzept-fuer-digitale-probes-entwickelt/.Google Scholar

  • [18]

    Lindsay, S., Jackson, D., Schofield, G. & Olivier, P. (2012). Engaging older people using participatory design. In: Proc. CHI 2012, 1199–1208.Google Scholar

  • [19]

    Maaß, S., Schirmer, C., Bötcher, A., Buchmüller, S., Koch, D. & Schumacher, R. (2016). Partizipative Entwicklung von Techno-logien für und mit ältere/n Menschen. Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Bremen. Accessible under https://elib.suub.uni-bremen.de/edocs/00105568-1.pdf.Google Scholar

  • [20]

    Mattelmäki, T. (2008). Design probes. Helsinki: University of Art and Design Helsinki.Google Scholar

  • [21]

    Muller, M. J., & Druin, A. (2012). Participatory Design: The Third Space. In: J. Jacko (Ed.). Human Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies and Emerging Applications. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis, 1125–1153.Google Scholar

  • [22]

    Quesenbery, W. & Brooks, K. (2010). Storytelling for User Experience. Brooklyn, N.Y.: Rosenfeld Media.Google Scholar

  • [23]

    Rogers, Y., Paay, J., Brereton, M., Vaisutis, K. L., Marsden, G. & Vetere, F. (2014). Never Too Old: Engaging Retired People Inventing the Future with MaKey MaKey. In: Proc. CHI 2014, 3913–3922.Google Scholar

  • [24]

    Rosson, M. B. & Carroll, J. M. (2012). Scenario Based Design. In: J. Jacko (Ed.). The human-computer interaction handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies and Emerging Applications. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis, 1105–1124.Google Scholar

  • [25]

    Sanders, E. B.-N. (2002). From User-Centered to Participatory Design Approaches. In: J. Frascara (Ed.), Design and the Social Sciences. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis, 1–7.Google Scholar

  • [26]

    Simonsen, J. & Robertson, T. (Eds.). (2012). Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • [27]

    Snyder, C. (2003). Paper Prototyping. The Fast and Easy Way to Design and Refine User Interfaces. San Francisco: Elsevier.Google Scholar

  • [28]

    Star, S. L. & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [29]

    Triantafyllakos, G., Palaigeorgiou, G. & Tsoukalas, I. A. (2010). Fictional characters in participatory design sessions: Introducing the “design alter egos” technique. Interacting with Computers, 22, 165–175.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [30]

    Wildman, D. M., White, E. L. & Muller, M. J. (1993). Participatory Design Through Games and Other Techniques. Tutorial Notes, InterCHI 1993.

About the article

Susanne Maaß

Susanne Maaß is a professor for Applied Informatics and leader of the work group Sociotechnical Systems Design and Gender (SoteG) at the Department for Mathematics and Informatics of the University of Bremen, Germany. She works in the area of requirements elicitation, participatory design, user-oriented software development and computer-supported cooperative work, integrating gender and diversity aspects in her teaching and research.

Sandra Buchmüller

Sandra Buchmüller is research associate at the Maria-Goeppert-Mayer-Professorship “Gender, Technology, Mobility” at the Institute of Flight Guidance at the Technical University of Braunschweig, Germany. Before that she worked for the research project Participatory Design of Technologies for Demographic Change (ParTec) at the Department of Mathematics and Informatics at the University of Bremen, Germany. She studied at the Cologne International School of Design and holds a doctorate from the Berlin University of the Arts. Her main concern is to translate, adapt and integrate theories and approaches from gender & queer studies, feminist science and technology studies, participatory and critical design approaches into research and practices of engineering sciences.


Published Online: 2018-08-07

Published in Print: 2018-08-28


Citation Information: i-com, Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages 119–135, ISSN (Online) 2196-6826, ISSN (Print) 1618-162X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2018-0015.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in