Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health

Editor-in-Chief: Merrick, Joav

Editorial Board Member: Birch, Diana ML / Blum, Robert W. / Greydanus, MD, Dr. HC (Athens), Donald E. / Hardoff, Daniel / Kerr, Mike / Levy, Howard B / Morad, Mohammed / Omar, Hatim A. / de Paul, Joaquin / Rydelius, Per-Anders / Shek, Daniel T.L. / Sher, Leo / Silber, Tomas J. / Towns, Susan / Urkin, Jacob / Verhofstadt-Deneve, Leni / Zeltzer, Lonnie / Tenenbaum, Ariel

6 Issues per year

CiteScore 2016: 0.71

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.381
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.383

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 25, Issue 4 (Dec 2013)


Factors influencing the quality of implementation of a positive youth development program in Hong Kong

Daniel T.L. Shek
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, P.R. China
  • Centre for Innovative Programmes for Adolescents and Families, Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, P.R. China
  • Kiang Wu Nursing College of Macau, Macau, P.R. China
  • Department of Social Work, East China Normal University, Shanghai, P.R. China
  • Division of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Kentucky Children’s Hospital, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Moon Y.M. Law
  • Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, P.R. China
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2013-03-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijamh-2013-0034


This study examines how social workers collaborate with school teachers in implementing a school-based positive youth development program in Hong Kong. Individual and focus group interviews are conducted with social workers cooperating with school teachers in implementing the Project P.A.T.H.S. in a school context. Through the interviews, strategies for establishing inter-disciplinary collaboration and factors that hinder or facilitate program implementation are identified. This case study highlights factors that facilitate the collaboration between social workers and school teachers, including the following: 1) sufficient training for instructors, 2) sharing of the practice wisdom and teaching experiences, 3) building up mutual support among different parties, 4) use of proactive communication, and 5) demonstration of self-disclosure.

Keywords: adolescents; case study; Hong Kong; positive youth development; program implementation; Project P.A.T.H.S


  • 1.

    Nation M, Crusto C, Wandersman A, Kumpfer KL, Seybolt D, et al. What works in prevention: principles of effective prevention programs. Prev Sci 2003;4:55–63.Google Scholar

  • 2.

    Kumpfer KL, Alvarado R. Family-strengthening approaches for the prevention of youth problem behaviors. Am Psychol 2003;58:457–65.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 3.

    Shek DTL, Sun RCF. Implementation quality of a positive youth development program: cross-case analyses based on seven cases in Hong Kong. ScientificWorldJ 2008;8:1075–87.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 4.

    Mihalic SF, Fagan AA, Argamaso S. Implementing the lifeskills training drug prevention program: factors related to implementation fidelity. Implement Sci 2008;3:5.CrossrefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 5.

    Ringwalt CL, Ennett S, Johnson R, Rohrbach LA, Simon-Rudolph A, et al. Factors associated with fidelity to substance use prevention curriculum guides in the nation’s middle schools. Health Educ Behav 2003;30:375–91.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 6.

    Lewis C, Battistich V, Schaps E. School-based primary prevention: what is an effective program? New Direct Child Dev 1990;50: 35–59.Google Scholar

  • 7.

    Liddle HA, Rowe TJ, Quille TJ, Dakof, GA, Mills DS, et al. Transporting a research-based adolescent drug treatment into practice. J Subst Abuse Treat 2002;22:231–43.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 8.

    Hudson JD. A model of professional knowledge for social work practice. Aust Soc Work 1997;50:35–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 9.

    Deiro J. Teacher strategies for nurturing healthy connections with students. J Just Caring Educ 1997;3:192–202.Google Scholar

  • 10.

    Goldstein H. The knowledge base of social work practice: theory, wisdom, analogue, or art? Fam Soc J Contemp H 1990;71:32–43.Google Scholar

  • 11.

    Chu WCK, Tsui MS. The nature of practice wisdom in social work revisited. Int Soc Work 2008;51:47–54.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 12.

    Carroll JM, Neale DC, Isenhour PL, Rossen MB, McCrickard DS. Notification and awareness: synchronizing task-oriented collaborative activity. Int J Hum Comput Stud 2003;58:605–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 13.

    Weisband S. Maintaining awareness in distributed team collaboration: implications for leadership and performance. In: Hinds P, Kiesler S, editors. Distributed work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002:311–33.Google Scholar

  • 14.

    Jourard SM. Self-disclosure: an experimental analysis of the transparent. New York: Wiley, 1971.Google Scholar

  • 15.

    Cozby PC. Self-disclosure: a literature review. Psychol Bull 1973;79:73–91.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 16.

    Nussbaum JF, Scott MD. Instructor communication behaviors and their relationship to classroom learning. In: Nimmo D, editor. Communication yearbook 3. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1979:561–83.Google Scholar

  • 17.

    Goldstein GS, Benassi VA. The relation between teacher self-disclosure and student classroom participation. Teach Psychol 1994;21:212–7.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 18.

    McCarthy PR, Schmeck RR. Effects of teacher self-disclosure on student learning and perceptions of teacher. Coll Stud J 1982;16:45–9.Google Scholar

  • 19.

    Sorensen G. The relationships among teachers’ self-disclosure statements, students’ perceptions, and affective learning. Commun Educ 1989;38:259–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 20.

    Mark MM. Evaluation’s future: furor, futile, or fertile? Am J Eval 2001;22:457–79.Google Scholar

  • 21.

    Rogers PJ. The whole world is evaluating half-full glasses. Am J Eval 2001;22:431–6.Google Scholar

  • 22.

    Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994.Google Scholar

  • 23.

    Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990.Google Scholar

  • 24.

    Shek DTL, Tang V, Han XY. Quality of qualitative evaluation studies in the social work literature: evidence that constitutes a wakeup call. Res Soc Work Pract 2005;15:180–94.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 25.

    Weinstein CS. Secondary classroom management: lessons from research and practice. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996.Google Scholar

  • 26.

    Martin NK, Baldwin B. Perspective regarding classroom management style: differences between elementary and secondary level teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Southwest Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA, 1996.Google Scholar

  • 27.

    Soodak LC, Podell DM. Teacher’s thinking about difficult-to-teach students. J Educ Res 1994;88:44–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 28.

    McCormack AC. Investigating the impact of an internship on the classroom management beliefs of preservice teachers. Professional Educ 2001;23:11–22.Google Scholar

  • 29.

    Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: WH Freeman, 1997.Google Scholar

  • 30.

    Ginns IS, Tulip DF, Watters JJ, Lucas KB. Changes in pre-service elementary teachers’ sense of efficacy in teaching science. School Sci Math 1995;95:394–400.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 31.

    McCroskey JC, Richmond VP. Power in the classroom I: teacher and student perceptions. Commun Educ 1983;32:175–84.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 32.

    Stout R, Salas E, Fowlkes J. Enhancing teamwork in complex environments through team training. Group Dyn 1997;1: 169–82.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 33.

    Lingard L, Reznick R, Espin S, Regehr G, DeVito L. Team communication in the operating room: talk patterns, sites of tension, and implication for novices. Acad Med 2002;77:232–7.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 34.

    Reagans R, McEvily B. Network structure and knowledge transfer: the effects of cohesion and range. Admin Sci Quart 2003;48:240–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 35.

    Collins NL, Miller LC. Self-disclosure and liking: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull 1994;116:457–75.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 36.

    Rogers C. Freedom to learn. Columbus, OH: Merrill, 1969.Google Scholar

  • 37.

    Tsang NM. Beyond theory and practice integration in social work: lessons from the West. Int Soc Work 1998;41:169–80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 38.

    Wuchty S, Jones BF, Uzzi B. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 2007;316:1036–9.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 39.

    Miller JM, Koons-Witt B, Ventura HE. Barriers to evaluating the effectiveness of drug treatment behind bars. J Crim Just 2004;32:75–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 40.

    Lee TY. A case study on the implementation of a positive youth development program (Project P.A.T.H.S.) in Hong Kong: learning from the experiential implementation phase. ScientificWorldJ 2008;8:1047–62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 41.

    Shek DTL, Ma CM, Tang CY. Predictors of subjective outcome evaluation findings in a positive youth development program in Hong Kong. Int J Disabil Hum Dev 2011;10:249–55.Google Scholar

  • 42.

    Shek DTL, Sun RCF, Merrick J. Training programs and implementation process of positive youth development programs. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2011;23:303–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 43.

    Shek DTL, Ma HK, Sun RCF. A brief overview of adolescent developmental problems in Hong Kong. ScientificWorldJ 2011;11:2243–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 44.

    Shek DTL, Ma HK, Sun RCF. Development of a new curriculum in a positive youth development program: the Project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong. ScientificWorldJ 2011;11:2207–18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 45.

    Shek DTL. Quality of life research: responses to emerging issues in a changing world. Soc Indi Res 2011;100:371–4.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Corresponding author: Professor Daniel T.L. Shek, PhD, FHKPS, BBS, JP, Chair Professor of Applied Social Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Room HJ407, Core H, Hunghom, Hong Kong, P.R. China, E-mail:

Received: 2012-03-01

Accepted: 2012-04-21

Published Online: 2013-03-01

Published in Print: 2013-12-01

Citation Information: International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, ISSN (Online) 2191-0278, ISSN (Print) 0334-0139, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijamh-2013-0034.

Export Citation

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in