Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health

Editor-in-Chief: Merrick, Joav

Editorial Board: Birch, Diana ML / Blum, Robert W. / Greydanus, MD, Dr. HC (Athens), Donald E. / Hardoff, Daniel / Kerr, Mike / Levy, Howard B / Morad, Mohammed / Omar, Hatim A. / de Paul, Joaquin / Rydelius, Per-Anders / Shek, Daniel T.L. / Sher, Leo / Silber, Tomas J. / Towns, Susan / Urkin, Jacob / Verhofstadt-Deneve, Leni / Zeltzer, Lonnie / Tenenbaum, Ariel

CiteScore 2018: 0.79

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.350
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.476

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Ahead of print


Attitudes and behaviors related to distracted driving in college students: a need for interventions in adolescence

Corey H. Basch
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Public Health, William Paterson University, University Hall 366, Wayne, NJ 07470, USA, Phone: +(973)-720-2603
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Sarah A. MacLean
  • Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Philip Garcia
Published Online: 2017-08-05 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijamh-2017-0069



One of the biggest contributors to distracted driving among young people in the United States is technology. The objective of this study was to describe distracted driving behaviors among college students, with a specific focus on attitudes towards and use of social media.


With written permission, a survey was adapted from the Distracted Driving Public Opinion Poll distributed by the National Safety Council. The survey comprised 43 questions assessing attitudes and behaviors. A total of 411 students enrolled in a personal health course were invited to complete the survey. In total 324 surveys were completed, resulting in a response rate of 79%.


Among students with a driver’s license, 95.2% reported engaging in distracted driving behaviors. The use of social media while driving was common, with 30.7% reporting that they glance at, read, or post to social media while driving, most commonly on Snapchat or Instagram. It was common for students to make or answer phone calls (72.0%), review or send text messages (54.6%), or glance at or read automatic notifications (43.3%). Almost all students (91.5%) reported that they believed a hands-free solution is safer than holding the phone while driving, but only 67.9% reported that they usually used a hands-free device. Students in a health major and students who drive in urban areas were more likely to engage in distracted driving behaviors.


These findings suggest a need for interventions, particularly those which target adolescents in an attempt to deter these behaviors as they transition into adulthood.

Keywords: college students; distracted driving; social media use; technology


  • [1]

    Rupp MA, Gentzler MD, Smither JA. Driving under the influence of distraction: Examining dissociations between risk perception and engagement in distracted driving. Accid Anal Prev. 2016;97:220–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [2]

    Federal Highway Administration. Highway Statistics 2010 2011.

  • [3]

    McKenzie B. Who Drives to Work? Commuting by Automobile in the United States: 2013 American Community Survey Reports. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, 2015. (Vol. ACS-32).Google Scholar

  • [4]

    McKenzie B, Rapino M. Commuting in the United States: 2009 American Community Survey Reports. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, 2011. (Vol. ACS-15).Google Scholar

  • [5]

    National Center for Statistics and Analysis. Early estimate of motor vehicle traffic fatalities for the first half (Jan-Jun) of 2016 Crash-Stats Brief Statistical Summary. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2016. (Vol. Report No. DOT HS 812 332).Google Scholar

  • [6]

    National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States, 2015: With Special Feature on Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities. Hyattsville, MD 2016.Google Scholar

  • [7]

    National Center for Statistics and Analysis. Driver Electronic Device Use in 2015. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2016. (Vol. 2017).Google Scholar

  • [8]

    Pearson MR, Murphy EM, Doane AN. Impulsivity-like traits and risky driving behaviors among college students. Accid Anal Prev. 2013;53:142–8.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [9]

    Romer D, Lee YC, McDonald CC, Winston FK. Adolescence, attention allocation, and driving safety. J Adolesc Health. 2014;54:S6–15.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [10]

    Sanbonmatsu DM, Strayer DL, Biondi F, Behrends AA, Moore SM. Cell-phone use diminishes self-awareness of impaired driving. Psychon Bull Rev. 2016;23:617–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [11]

    Terry CP, Terry DL. Cell phone-related near accidents among young drivers: associations with mindfulness. J Psychol. 2015;149:665–83.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [12]

    O’Connor SS, Whitehill JM, King KM, Kernic MA, Boyle LN, Bresnahan BW, et al. Compulsive cell phone use and history of motor vehicle crash. J Adolesc Health. 2013;53:512–9.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [13]

    Smith A. Record shares of Americans now own smartphones, have home broadband. Pew Research Center 2017. Available on: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/01/12/evolution-of-technology/.

  • [14]

    Lenhart A. Teens, Social Media & Technology Overview 2015. Pew Research Center 2015. Available on: http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/09/teens-social-media-technology-2015/.

  • [15]

    National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Teen Drivers: Get the Facts. 2016 From http://www.cdc.gov/motorvehiclesafety/teen_drivers/teendrivers_factsheet.html. Retrieved 2017, 26 April.

  • [16]

    Duggan M. Mobile Messaging and Social Media 2015: Pew Research Center 2015.

  • [17]

    State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. Distracted Driving. 2016, 30 March 2017 From https://newsroom.statefarm.com/download/347376/2016generaldistracteddrivers.pdf. Retrieved 26 April, 2017.

  • [18]

    Hill L, Rybar J, Styer T, Fram E, Merchant G, Eastman A. Prevalence of and attitudes about distracted driving in college students. Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16:362–7.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [19]

    Harrison MA. College students’ prevalence and perceptions of text messaging while driving. Accid Anal Prev. 2011;43:1516–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [20]

    Olsen EO, Shults RA, Eaton DK. Texting while driving and other risky motor vehicle behaviors among US high school students. Pediatrics. 2013;131:e1708–15.Google Scholar

  • [21]

    Liberty Mutual Insurance. Teen driving study reveals “App and Drive” is new danger among teens, new worry for parents From https://libertymutualgroup.com/about-lm/news/news-release-archive/articles/app-and-drive. Retrieved 2017, 26 April.

  • [22]

    Bachman SL, Arbogast H, Ruiz P, Farag M, Demeter NE, Upperman JS, et al. A school-hospital partnership increases knowledge of pedestrian and motor vehicle safety. J Community Health. 2015;40:1057–64.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [23]

    Unni P, Morrow SE, Shultz BL, Tian TT. A pilot hospital-school educational program to address teen motor vehicle safety. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;75:S285–9.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [24]

    Rohl A, Eriksson S, Metcalf D. Evaluating the effectiveness of a front windshield sticker reminder in reducing texting while driving in young adults. Cureus. 2016;8:e691.Google Scholar

  • [25]

    Wandtner B, Schumacher M, Schmidt EA. The role of self-regulation in the context of driver distraction: a simulator study. Traffic Inj Prev. 2016;17:472–9.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [26]

    Wilson FA, Stimpson JP. Trends in fatalities from distracted driving in the United States, 1999 to 2008. Am J Public Health. 2010;100:2213–9.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [27]

    Huth V, Sanchez Y, Brusque C. Drivers’ phone use at red traffic lights: a roadside observation study comparing calls and visual-manual interactions. Accid Anal Prev. 2015;74:42–8.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2017-04-27

Accepted: 2017-06-08

Published Online: 2017-08-05

Citation Information: International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 20170069, ISSN (Online) 2191-0278, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijamh-2017-0069.

Export Citation

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Anne M. Foreman, Yusuke Hayashi, Jonathan E. Friedel, and Oliver Wirth
Traffic Injury Prevention, 2019, Page 1

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in