Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health

Editor-in-Chief: Merrick, Joav

Editorial Board: Birch, Diana ML / Blum, Robert W. / Greydanus, MD, Dr. HC (Athens), Donald E. / Hardoff, Daniel / Kerr, Mike / Levy, Howard B / Morad, Mohammed / Omar, Hatim A. / de Paul, Joaquin / Rydelius, Per-Anders / Shek, Daniel T.L. / Sher, Leo / Silber, Tomas J. / Towns, Susan / Urkin, Jacob / Verhofstadt-Deneve, Leni / Zeltzer, Lonnie / Tenenbaum, Ariel


CiteScore 2018: 0.79

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.350
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.476

Online
ISSN
2191-0278
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Ahead of print

Issues

Integrated training (practicing, peer clinical training and OSCE assessment): a ladder to promote learning and training

Mahlegha Dehghan
  • Nursing Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
  • Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Fatemeh Ghaedi Heidari / Zahra Karzari / Parvin Mangolian Shahrbabaki
  • Corresponding author
  • Nursing Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
  • Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2018-05-25 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijamh-2017-0222

Abstract

Introduction

The teaching-learning process plays an effective role in training nursing students. Devising novel methods can lead to achievement of educational objectives as well as promotion of the clinical and practical training. The present study is aimed to determine the effect of integrated training, including practicing, peer clinical training and objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) assessment.

Methods

The interventional study was conducted on 58 freshman students. Two groups underwent a five-stage educational process; so that, all the students were trained and practiced in the skills lab, and their practical skills were investigated via the OSCE test. Afterwards, for clinical training in hospital, they were randomly divided into two groups of routine training (n = 26) and the peer-learning method (n = 32). Subsequently, in order to investigate the outcomes of the process, the OSCE test scores of the two training groups were compared both before and after the apprenticeship course.

Results

Scores of all the students were increased significantly at the end of the semester, but in terms of the total score of the clinical skills (14.79 ± 1.52 vs. 18.52 ± 0.84), the difference was insignificant (p = 0.29).

Conclusion

Training clinical skills along with OSCE practice and assessment can improve the nursing students’ learning as well as their practical and clinical performance. Improvement of the students’ performance can lead to high-quality care nursing.

Keywords: integrated training; learning; OSCE assessment; peer clinical training; practicing; training

References

  • [1]

    Shahrbabaki PM, Nouhi E, Kazemi M, Ahmadi F. Defective support network: a major obstacle to coping for patients with heart failure: a qualitative study. Global health action. 2016;9(1):30767 (persian).Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [2]

    Elcigil A, Sarı HY. Determining problems experienced by student nurses in their work with clinical educators in Turkey. Nurse Educ Today. 2007;27(5):491–8.PubMedCrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [3]

    Iwasiw CL, Goldenberg D, Andrusyszyn M-A. Curriculum development in nursing education. UK: Jones & Bartlett Publishers; 2014.Google Scholar

  • [4]

    Mangolian Shahrbabaki P, Nouhi E, Kazemi M. The sliding context of health: the challenges faced by patients with heart failure from the perspective of patients, healthcare providers and family members. J Clini Nurs. 2017;26(21-22):3597–609.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [5]

    Barbaz A, Zareiyan A. Comparison of three instructional methods for drug calculation skill in nursing critical care courses: lecturing, problem solving, and computer-assisted self-learning. Iran J Med Educ. 2012;12(6):420–9 (Persian).Google Scholar

  • [6]

    Seyed Roghani P, Akbarsharifi T, Ruzbeh F, Shekarabi R, Haghani H. A study of senior nursing student’s opinions about clinical skills level acquired during nursing training. Iran J Nurs. 2006;18(44):67–76 (Persian).Google Scholar

  • [7]

    Oshvandi K, Bikmoradi A. The effects of inquiry-based clinical instruction of nursing students on applying nursing process skill. Sci J Hamadan Nurs Midwifery Fac. 2013;21(1):5–15 (Persian).Google Scholar

  • [8]

    Banning M. Approaches to teaching: current opinions and related research. Nurse Educ Today. 2005;25(7):502–8.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [9]

    Parkin V. Peer education: the nursing experience. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2006;37(6):257–64.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [10]

    Yuan H, Williams BA, Fan L. A systematic review of selected evidence on developing nursing students’ critical thinking through problem-based learning. Nurse Educ Today. 2008;28(6):657–63.CrossrefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [11]

    Brannagan KB, Dellinger A, Thomas J, Mitchell D, Lewis-Trabeaux S, Dupre S. Impact of peer teaching on nursing students: perceptions of learning environment, self-efficacy, and knowledge. Nurse Educ Today. 2013;33(11):1440–7.PubMedCrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [12]

    Christiansen A, Bell A. Peer learning partnerships: exploring the experience of pre-registration nursing students. J Clin Nurs. 2010;19(5–6):803–10.PubMedCrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [13]

    Rasooli P, Khankeh H, Khoshknab MF, Rahgozar M. Effect of time management training on work-family conflict among hospital nurses. HAYAT. 2009;15(3):5–11 (Persian).Google Scholar

  • [14]

    Walsh CM, Rose DN, Dubrowski A, Ling SC, Grierson LE, Backstein D, et al. Learning in the simulated setting: a comparison of expert-, peer-, and computer-assisted learning. Acad Med. 2011;86(10):S12–6.CrossrefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [15]

    Nicholson B, Forrest K. What influences performance in the OSCE exam? The medical student perspective. Med Teach. 2009;31(11):1040.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [16]

    Young I, Montgomery K, Kearns P, Hayward S, Mellanby E. The benefits of a peer-assisted mock OSCE. Clin Teach. 2014;11(3):214–8.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [17]

    Selim AA, Ramadan FH, El-Gueneidy MM, Gaafer MM. Using objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in undergraduate psychiatric nursing education: is it reliable and valid? Nurse Educ Today. 2012;32(3):283–8.PubMedWeb of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [18]

    Panjehpour M, Ataee N. Comparison the effectiveness of problem solving method with lecture-based method in the teaching of metabolic biochemistry. Iran J Med Educ. 2012;11(9):1318–25 (Persian).Google Scholar

  • [19]

    Secomb J. A systematic review of peer teaching and learning in clinical education. J Clin Nurs. 2008;17(6):703–16.CrossrefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [20]

    Boud D, Cohen R, Sampson J. Peer learning in higher education: learning from and with each other. US: Routledge; 2014.Google Scholar

  • [21]

    Zarifnejad G, Mirhaghi A, Rajabpoor M. Learning experience through peer education: a qualitative study. Iran J Med Educ. 2015;15:27–40 (Persian).Google Scholar

  • [22]

    Shahrbabaki PM, Farokhzadian J, Hasanabadi Z. Effect of Self-care Education on Patient’s Knowledge and Performance with Heart Failure. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012;31:918–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [23]

    Motevasseliyan M, Nasiriaian K. Impact of near-peer teaching on learning dressing skill among nursing students. Iran J Med Educ. 2014;14(8):678–84 (persian).Google Scholar

  • [24]

    Kimyai S, Jafari Navimipour E, Mohammadi N. The effect of peer education on practical skills training of dentistry students in restorative preclinic. Iran J Med Educ. 2011;11(4):418–24 (Persian).Google Scholar

  • [25]

    Buckley S, Zamora J. Effects of participation in a cross year peer tutoring programme in clinical examination skills on volunteer tutors’ skills and attitudes towards teachers and teaching. BMC Med Educ. 2007;7(1):20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [26]

    Eslami Akbar R, Hojat M, Badiyepeymaie Jahromi Z. Comparison of teaching through peer learning with the lecture method on the learning level of anesthesiology students at Jahrom University of Medical Sciences in 2013. J Nurs Educ. 2015;4(3):56–65.Google Scholar

  • [27]

    Fotheringham D. Triangulation for the assessment of clinical nursing skills: a review of theory, use and methodology. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010;47(3):386–91.CrossrefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [28]

    Rush S, Firth T, Burke L, Marks-Maran D. Implementation and evaluation of peer assessment of clinical skills for first year student nurses. Nurse Educ Pract. 2012;12(4):219–26.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [29]

    Goldsmith M, Stewart L, Ferguson L. Peer learning partnership: an innovative strategy to enhance skill acquisition in nursing students. Nurse Educ Today. 2006;26(2):123–30.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [30]

    McKenna L, French J. A step ahead: teaching undergraduate students to be peer teachers. Nurse Educ Pract. 2011;11(2):141–5.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [31]

    Loke AJ, Chow FL. Learning partnership – the experience of peer tutoring among nursing students: a qualitative study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2007;44(2):237–44.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [32]

    Stone R, Cooper S, Cant R. The value of peer learning in undergraduate nursing education: a systematic review. ISRN Nurs. 2013;3:930901.Google Scholar

  • [33]

    Horne M, Woodhead K, Morgan L, Smithies L, Megson D, Lyte G. Using enquiry in learning: from vision to reality in higher education. Nurse Educ Today. 2007;27(2):103–12.CrossrefWeb of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2017-12-21

Accepted: 2018-02-19

Published Online: 2018-05-25


Funding: This study received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interest: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


Citation Information: International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 20170222, ISSN (Online) 2191-0278, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijamh-2017-0222.

Export Citation

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in