Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

The International Journal of Biostatistics

Ed. by Chambaz, Antoine / Hubbard, Alan E. / van der Laan, Mark J.


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 1.309

CiteScore 2018: 1.11

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 1.325
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.715

Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) 2018: 0.03

Online
ISSN
1557-4679
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Pattern Mixture Models and Latent Class Models for the Analysis of Multivariate Longitudinal Data with Informative Dropouts

Etienne Dantan / Cécile Proust-Lima / Luc Letenneur / Helene Jacqmin-Gadda
Published Online: 2008-07-26 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1557-4679.1088

Missing data and especially dropouts frequently arise in longitudinal data. Maximum likelihood estimates are consistent when data are missing at random (MAR) but, as this assumption is not checkable, pattern mixture models (PMM) have been developed to deal with informative dropout. More recently, latent class models (LCM) have been proposed as a way to relax PMM assumptions. The aim of this paper is to compare PMM and LCM in order to tackle informative dropout in a longitudinal study of cognitive ageing measured by several psychometric tests. Using a multivariate longitudinal model with a latent process, a sensitivity analysis was performed to compare estimates under the MAR assumption, from a PMM and from two LCM. In the PMM, dropout patterns are included as covariates in the multivariate longitudinal model. In the simple LCM, they are predictors of the class membership probabilities while, in the joint LCM, the dropout time is jointly modeled using a proportional hazard model depending on latent classes. We show that parameter interpretation is different in the two kinds of models and thus can lead to different estimated values. PMM parameters are adjusted on the dropout patterns while LCM parameters are adjusted on the latent classes. This difference is highlighted in our data set because the latent classes exhibit much more heterogeneity than dropout patterns. We suggest several complementary analyses to investigate the characteristics of latent classes in order to understand the meaning of the parameters when using LCM to deal with informative dropout.

Keywords: dropout; joint model; latent class model; missing data; mixed model; pattern mixture model

About the article

Published Online: 2008-07-26


Citation Information: The International Journal of Biostatistics, Volume 4, Issue 1, ISSN (Online) 1557-4679, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1557-4679.1088.

Export Citation

©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Guozhi Jiang, Andrea On Yan Luk, Claudia Ha Ting Tam, Fangying Xie, Bendix Carstensen, Eric Siu Him Lau, Cadmon King Poo Lim, Heung Man Lee, Alex Chi Wai Ng, Maggie Chor Yin Ng, Risa Ozaki, Alice Pik Shan Kong, Chun Chung Chow, Xilin Yang, Hui-yao Lan, Stephen Kwok Wing Tsui, Xiaodan Fan, Cheuk Chun Szeto, Wing Yee So, Juliana Chung Ngor Chan, Ronald Ching Wan Ma, Ronald C.W. Ma, Juliana C.N. Chan, Yu Huang, Hui-yao Lan, Si Lok, Brian Tomlinson, Stephen K.W. Tsui, Weichuan Yu, Kevin Y.L. Yip, Ting Fung Chan, Xiaodan Fan, Wing Yee So, Cheuk Chun Szeto, Nelson L.S. Tang, Andrea O. Luk, Xiaoyu Tian, Guozhi Jiang, Claudia H.T. Tam, Heung Man Lee, Cadmon K.P. Lim, Katie K.H. Chan, Fangying Xie, Alex C.W. Ng, Grace P.Y. Cheung, Ming-wai Yeung, Shi Mai, Fei Xie, Sen Zhang, Pu Yu, and Meng Weng
Kidney International, 2018
[2]
Maria Francesca Marino, Nikos Tzavidis, and Marco Alfò
Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 2016, Page 096228021667843
[3]
Angshuman Sarkar, Kalyan Das, and Sanjoy K Sinha
Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 2016, Volume 25, Number 5, Page 1836
[4]
Cécile Proust-Lima, Mbéry Séne, Jeremy MG Taylor, and Hélène Jacqmin-Gadda
Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 2014, Volume 23, Number 1, Page 74
[5]
Graeme L. Hickey, Pete Philipson, Andrea Jorgensen, and Ruwanthi Kolamunnage-Dona
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2016, Volume 16, Number 1
[6]
A. Lawrence Gould, Mark Ernest Boye, Michael J. Crowther, Joseph G. Ibrahim, George Quartey, Sandrine Micallef, and Frederic Y. Bois
Statistics in Medicine, 2015, Volume 34, Number 14, Page 2202
[7]
Christophe Genolini, René Écochard, and Hélène Jacqmin-Gadda
Open Journal of Statistics, 2013, Volume 03, Number 04, Page 26
[8]
Shigang Liu, Honghua Dai, and Min Gan
International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 2015
[9]
Mai Sherif Hafez, Irini Moustaki, and Jouni Kuha
Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2015, Volume 22, Number 2, Page 193
[10]
Hélène Jacqmin-Gadda, Cécile Proust-Lima, Jeremy M.G. Taylor, and Daniel Commenges
Biometrics, 2010, Volume 66, Number 1, Page 11
[11]
Sonya K. Sterba and Nisha C. Gottfredson
Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2015, Volume 22, Number 2, Page 294
[12]
Sanjoy K. Sinha and Abdus Sattar
Canadian Journal of Statistics, 2014, Volume 42, Number 4, Page 670
[13]
Nisha C. Gottfredson, Daniel J. Bauer, and Scott A. Baldwin
Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2014, Volume 21, Number 2, Page 196
[14]
Haiqun Lin, Ling Han, Peter N. Peduzzi, Terrence E. Murphy, Thomas M. Gill, and Heather G. Allore
Statistics in Medicine, 2014, Volume 33, Number 15, Page 2645
[16]
[17]
Yutaka Kano and Keiji Takai
Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 2011, Volume 102, Number 9, Page 1241

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in