Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

The International Journal of Biostatistics

Ed. by Chambaz, Antoine / Hubbard, Alan E. / van der Laan, Mark J.

2 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.500
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.862

CiteScore 2017: 0.97

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 1.150
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.022

Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) 2016: 0.09

See all formats and pricing
More options …

Comparing Approaches to Causal Inference for Longitudinal Data: Inverse Probability Weighting versus Propensity Scores

Ashkan Ertefaie / David A Stephens
Published Online: 2010-03-08 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1557-4679.1198

In observational studies for causal effects, treatments are assigned to experimental units without the benefits of randomization. As a result, there is the potential for bias in the estimation of the treatment effect. Two methods for estimating the causal effect consistently are Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW) and the Propensity Score (PS). We demonstrate that in many simple cases, the PS method routinely produces estimators with lower Mean-Square Error (MSE). In the longitudinal setting, estimation of the causal effect of a time-dependent exposure in the presence of time-dependent covariates that are themselves affected by previous treatment also requires adjustment approaches. We describe an alternative approach to the classical binary treatment propensity score termed the Generalized Propensity Score (GPS). Previously, the GPS has mainly been applied in a single interval setting; we use an extension of the GPS approach to the longitudinal setting. We compare the strengths and weaknesses of IPTW and GPS for causal inference in three simulation studies and two real data sets. Again, in simulation, the GPS appears to produce estimators with lower MSE.

Keywords: inverse probability weighting; propensity scores; longitudinal data

About the article

Published Online: 2010-03-08

Citation Information: The International Journal of Biostatistics, Volume 6, Issue 2, ISSN (Online) 1557-4679, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1557-4679.1198.

Export Citation

©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Jonathan M. Snowden, Sherri Rose, and Kathleen M. Mortimer
American Journal of Epidemiology, 2011, Volume 173, Number 7, Page 731
Daniel P. Mears and Joshua C. Cochran
Criminal Justice and Behavior, 2013, Volume 40, Number 11, Page 1280
Askal Ayalew Ali, Hong Xiao, Rima Tawk, Ellen Campbell, Anastasia Semykina, Alberto J. Montero, and Vakaramoko Diaby
Current Medical Research and Opinion, 2017, Volume 33, Number 2, Page 391
Menglan Pang, Tibor Schuster, Kristian B. Filion, Maria Eberg, and Robert W. Platt
Epidemiology, 2016, Volume 27, Number 4, Page 570
Wayne Martin
Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 2014, Volume 113, Number 3, Page 281
Jeremy M. G. Taylor, Jincheng Shen, Edward H. Kennedy, Lu Wang, and Douglas E. Schaubel
Statistics in Medicine, 2014, Volume 33, Number 2, Page 257
Richard J. Cook, Ker-Ai Lee, Meaghan Cuerden, and Cecilia A. Cotton
Statistics in Medicine, 2013, Volume 32, Number 25, Page 4380

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in