Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

The International Journal of Biostatistics

Ed. by Chambaz, Antoine / Hubbard, Alan E. / van der Laan, Mark J.

2 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.840
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.000

CiteScore 2017: 0.97

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 1.150
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.022

Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) 2016: 0.09

See all formats and pricing
More options …

Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Natural Direct Effects

Wenjing Zheng / Mark J. van der Laan
Published Online: 2012-01-06 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1557-4679.1361

In many causal inference problems, one is interested in the direct causal effect of an exposure on an outcome of interest that is not mediated by certain intermediate variables. Robins and Greenland (1992) and Pearl (2001) formalized the definition of two types of direct effects (natural and controlled) under the counterfactual framework. The efficient scores (under a nonparametric model) for the various natural effect parameters and their general robustness conditions, as well as an estimating equation based estimator using the efficient score, are provided in Tchetgen Tchetgen and Shpitser (2011b). In this article, we apply the targeted maximum likelihood framework of van der Laan and Rubin (2006) and van der Laan and Rose (2011) to construct a semiparametric efficient, multiply robust, substitution estimator for the natural direct effect which satisfies the efficient score equation derived in Tchetgen Tchetgen and Shpitser (2011b). We note that the robustness conditions in Tchetgen Tchetgen and Shpitser (2011b) may be weakened, thereby placing less reliance on the estimation of the mediator density. More precisely, the proposed estimator is asymptotically unbiased if either one of the following holds: i) the conditional mean outcome given exposure, mediator, and confounders, and the mediated mean outcome difference are consistently estimated; (ii) the exposure mechanism given confounders, and the conditional mean outcome are consistently estimated; or (iii) the exposure mechanism and the mediator density, or the exposure mechanism and the conditional distribution of the exposure given confounders and mediator, are consistently estimated. If all three conditions hold, then the effect estimate is asymptotically efficient. Extensions to the natural indirect effect are also discussed.

Keywords: natural direct effects; natural indirect effects; mediation analysis; mediation formula; mediator; direct effects; asymptotic efficiency; robust; double robust; asymptotic linearity; canonical gradient; efficient influence curve; efficient score; loss-based learning; targeted maximum likelihood estimator; targeted learning; parametric working submodels

About the article

Published Online: 2012-01-06

Citation Information: The International Journal of Biostatistics, Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 1–40, ISSN (Online) 1557-4679, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1557-4679.1361.

Export Citation

©2012 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Noémi Kreif, Linh Tran, Richard Grieve, Bianca De Stavola, Robert C Tasker, and Maya Petersen
American Journal of Epidemiology, 2017, Page 1
Wenjing Zheng and Mark van der Laan
Journal of Causal Inference, 2017, Volume 0, Number 0
Bianca L. De Stavola, Rhian M. Daniel, George B. Ploubidis, and Nadia Micali
American Journal of Epidemiology, 2015, Volume 181, Number 1, Page 64
Quynh C. Nguyen, Theresa L. Osypuk, Nicole M. Schmidt, M. Maria Glymour, and Eric J. Tchetgen Tchetgen
American Journal of Epidemiology, 2015, Volume 181, Number 5, Page 349
Mostafa Abdelrahman, Magdi El-Sayed, Sudisha Jogaiah, David J. Burritt, and Lam-Son Phan Tran
Plant Cell Reports, 2017, Volume 36, Number 7, Page 1009
Tyler J. VanderWeele
Annual Review of Public Health, 2016, Volume 37, Number 1, Page 17
Samuel D. Lendle, Meenakshi S. Subbaraman, and Mark J. van der Laan
Biometrics, 2013, Volume 69, Number 2, Page 310
Samuel D. Lendle, Bruce Fireman, and Mark J. van der Laan
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2013, Volume 66, Number 8, Page S91
Eric J. Tchetgen Tchetgen
Statistics in Medicine, 2013, Volume 32, Number 26, Page 4567
R. M. Daniel, B. L. De Stavola, S. N. Cousens, and S. Vansteelandt
Biometrics, 2015, Volume 71, Number 1, Page 1
Martin Huber
Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2014, Volume 29, Number 6, Page 920

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in