Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

The International Journal of Biostatistics

Ed. by Chambaz, Antoine / Hubbard, Alan E. / van der Laan, Mark J.

2 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.500
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.862

CiteScore 2016: 0.42

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.488
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.467

Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) 2016: 0.09

Online
ISSN
1557-4679
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Evaluating a New Marker for Risk Prediction Using the Test Tradeoff: An Update

Stuart G. Baker / Ben Van Calster / Ewout W. Steyerberg
Published Online: 2012-03-22 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/1557-4679.1395

Most of the methodological literature on evaluating an additional marker for risk prediction involves purely statistical measures of classification performance. A disadvantage of a purely statistical measure is the difficulty in deciding the improvement in the measure that would make inclusion of the additional marker worthwhile. In contrast, a medical decision making approach can weigh the cost or harm of ascertaining an additional marker against the benefit of a higher true positive rate for a given false positive rate that may be associated with risk prediction involving the additional marker. An appealing form of the medical decision making approach involves the risk threshold, which is the risk at which the expected utility of treatment and no treatment is the same. In this framework, a readily interpretable evaluation of the net benefit of an additional marker is the test tradeoff corresponding to the risk threshold. The test tradeoff is the minimum number of tests for a new marker that need to be traded for a true positive to yield an increase in the net benefit of risk prediction with the additional marker. For a sensitivity analysis the test tradeoff is computed over multiple risk thresholds. This article updates the theory and estimation of the test tradeoff. An example is provided.

Keywords: decision curves; relative utility curves; receiver-operating characteristic curve; risk threshold; test tradeoff

About the article

Published Online: 2012-03-22


Citation Information: The International Journal of Biostatistics, ISSN (Online) 1557-4679, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/1557-4679.1395.

Export Citation

©2012 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Stuart G. Baker
Statistics in Medicine, 2017, Volume 36, Number 28, Page 4491
[3]
Dean Billheimer, Eugene W. Gerner, Christine E. McLaren, and Bonnie LaFleur
Cancer Informatics, 2014, Volume 13s2, Page CIN.S13780
[4]
Ben Van Calster, Andrew J. Vickers, Michael J. Pencina, Stuart G. Baker, Dirk Timmerman, and Ewout W. Steyerberg
Medical Decision Making, 2013, Volume 33, Number 4, Page 490
[5]
Marlies S. Reimers, Peter J. K. Kuppen, Mark Lee, Margarita Lopatin, Haluk Tezcan, Hein Putter, Kim Clark-Langone, Gerrit Jan Liefers, Steve Shak, and Cornelis J. H. van de Velde
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2014, Volume 106, Number 11
[6]
Ben Van Calster and Andrew J. Vickers
Medical Decision Making, 2015, Volume 35, Number 2, Page 162
[7]
Gene Pennello, Norberto Pantoja-Galicia, and Scott Evans
Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 2016, Volume 26, Number 6, Page 1083
[8]
Davood Khalili, Samaneh Asgari, Farzad Hadaegh, Ewout W. Steyerberg, Kazem Rahimi, Noushin Fahimfar, and Fereidoun Azizi
International Journal of Cardiology, 2015, Volume 184, Page 587
[9]
John K. Field, Ying Chen, Michael W. Marcus, Fiona E. Mcronald, Olaide Y. Raji, and Stephen W. Duffy
Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2013, Volume 108, Number 5, Page 304
[10]
Stuart G. Baker, Ewoud Schuit, Ewout W. Steyerberg, Michael J. Pencina, Andew Vickers, Karel G.M. Moons, Ben W.J. Mol, and Karen S. Lindeman
Statistics in Medicine, 2014, Volume 33, Number 22, Page 3946
[11]
Margaret S. Pepe, Jing Fan, Ziding Feng, Thomas Gerds, and Jorgen Hilden
Statistics in Biosciences, 2015, Volume 7, Number 2, Page 282
[12]
Ewout W. Steyerberg, Moniek M. Vedder, Maarten J. G. Leening, Douwe Postmus, Ralph B. D'Agostino, Ben Van Calster, and Michael J. Pencina
Biometrical Journal, 2015, Volume 57, Number 4, Page 556

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in