Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering

Ed. by de Lasa, Hugo / Xu, Charles Chunbao

12 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.623
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.761

CiteScore 2017: 0.86

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.306
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.503

Online
ISSN
1542-6580
See all formats and pricing
Online
Institutional Subscription
€ [D] 337.00 / US$ 456.00 / GBP 276.00*
Individual Subscription
€ [D] 99.00 / US$ 149.00 / GBP 80.00*
*Prices in US$ apply to orders placed in the Americas only. Prices in GBP apply to orders placed in Great Britain only. Prices in € represent the retail prices valid in Germany (unless otherwise indicated). Prices are subject to change without notice. Prices do not include postage and handling if applicable. RRP: Recommended Retail Price.
More options …

CFD Modeling with Experimental Validation of the Internal Hydrodynamics in a Pilot-Scale Slurry Bubble Column Reactor

Omar M. BashaORCID iD: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5406-3328 / Li Weng
  • National Institute of Clean-and-Low-Carbon Energy, Beijing 102209, People’s Republic of China
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
 / Zhuowu Men
  • National Institute of Clean-and-Low-Carbon Energy, Beijing 102209, People’s Republic of China
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
 / Badie I. Morsi
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2016-02-09 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijcre-2015-0165

30,00 € / $42.00 / £23.00

Get Access to Full Text

Abstract

A multiphase-Eulerian, three-dimensional (3-D), computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model was built to investigate the local hydrodynamics of a pilot-scale (0.29 m ID, 3 m height) Slurry Bubble Column Reactor (SBCR). The model was first validated against the gas holdup radial profiles in an air-water-glass beads system obtained in a 0.254 m ID and 2.5 m height column under ambient conditions at various superficial gas velocities by Yu and Kim (Bubble characteristics in the radial direction of three-phase fluidized beds. AIChE Journal 34, 2069–2072, 1988). The model was next validated against the gas holdup radial profile data for N2-Drakeol-glass beads system obtained in a 0.44 m ID and 2.44 m height reactor, including internals, operating under ambient conditions at various superficial gas velocities by Chen et al. (Fluid dynamic parameters in bubble columns with internals. Chemical Engineering Science 54, 2187–2197, 1999). The model was also validated against experimental data obtained in our lab for N2-Fischer Tropsch (F-T) reactor wax-Fe catalyst system obtained in a pilot-scale, Slurry Bubble column Reactor, SBCR (0.29 m ID, 3 m height) under pressures and temperatures up to 25.9 bar and 490 K, respectively. These three validations led to the selection of the turbulence and interphase drag coefficient models, and the optimization of the solution method, mesh size and structure and the step size. Moreover, the inclusion of RNG k-ε turbulence model coupled with the Wen-Yu (Mechanics of Fluidization. Chemical Engineering Progress Symposium Series 62, 100–111, 1966) / Schiller-Naumann (A drag coefficient correlation. Zeitung Ver. Deutsch. Ing 77, 318–320, 1935) drag correlations, and the mass transfer coefficients were found to provide the most accurate predictions of the experimental data. The CFD model was then used to investigate local gas holdup, liquid recirculation, local turbulence intensities, bubble diameters, and solids distribution throughout our pilot-scale SBCR, operating under typical F-T process conditions. The model predictions showed strong liquid recirculation and backmixing near the walls of the reactor, and the solid-phase velocity vectors closely followed those of the liquid-phase. A relatively high liquid turbulence intensities were observed in the vicinity of the sparger upon startup, however, after reaching a steady state, the liquid turbulence intensities became more evenly distributed throughout the reactor. The liquid turbulence intensities were slightly higher near the center of the reactor, and closely resembled the velocity vectors. Also, the Sauter mean bubble diameters increased, whereas the solids distribution decreased with reactor height above the gas distributor.

Keywords: reactors; SBCR; computational fluid dynamics; modeling; Fischer-Tropsch

References

  • 1. Ansys, A.F., 2011. 14.0 Theory Guide, ANSYS Inc., 218–221.

  • 2. Antal, S.P., Lahey Jr, R.T., Flaherty, J.E., 1991. Analysis of phase distribution in fully developed laminar bubbly two-phase flow. International Journal of Multiphase Flow 17, 635–652.Google Scholar

  • 3. Auton, T.R., Hunt, J.C.R., Prud’homme, M., 1988. Force exerted on a body in inviscid unsteady non-uniform rotational flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 197, 241–257.Google Scholar

  • 4. Basha, O.M., Sehabiague, L., Abdel-Wahab, A., Morsi, B.I., 2015. Fischer–Tropsch synthesis in slurry bubble column reactors: experimental investigations and modeling–a review. International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering 13, 201–288.Google Scholar

  • 5. Behkish, A., Lemoine, R., Oukaci, R., Morsi, B.I., 2006. Novel correlations for gas holdup in large-scale slurry bubble column reactors operating under elevated pressures and temperatures. Chemical Engineering Journal 115, 157–171.Google Scholar

  • 6. Behkish, A., Lemoine, R., Sehabiague, L., Oukaci, R., Morsi, B.I., 2007. Gas holdup and bubble size behavior in a large-scale slurry bubble column reactor operating with an organic liquid under elevated pressures and temperatures. Chemical Engineering Journal 128, 69–84.Google Scholar

  • 7. Behkish, A., Men, Z., Inga, J.R., Morsi, B.I., 2002. Mass transfer characteristics in a large-scale slurry bubble column reactor with organic liquid mixtures. Chemical Engineering Science 57, 3307–3324.Google Scholar

  • 8. Burns, A.D., Frank, T., Hamill, I., Shi, J.-M., 2004. The Favre averaged drag model for turbulent dispersion in Eulerian multi-phase flows, in 5th international conference on multiphase flow, ICMF.

  • 9. Cao, C., Liu, M., Wen, J., Guo, Q., 2009. Experimental measurement and numerical simulation for liquid flow velocity and local phase hold-ups in the riser of a GLSCFB. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification 48, 288–295.Google Scholar

  • 10. Cartland Glover, G.M., Generalis, S.C., 2004. Gas–liquid–solid flow modelling in a bubble column. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification 43, 117–126.Google Scholar

  • 11. Chen, C., Fan, L.-S., 2004. Discrete simulation of gas-liquid bubble columns and gas-liquid-solid fluidized beds. AIChE Journal 50, 288–301.Google Scholar

  • 12. Chen, J., Li, F., Degaleesan, S., Gupta, P., Al-Dahhan, M.H., Dudukovic, M.P., et al., 1999. Fluid dynamic parameters in bubble columns with internals. Chemical Engineering Science 54, 2187–2197.Google Scholar

  • 13. Clift, R., Grace, J.R., Weber, M.E., 1978. Bubbles, Drops, and Particles, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • 14. De, S., Ghosh, S., Parichha, R., De, P., 1999. Gas hold-up in two-phase system with internals. Indian Chemical Engineer 41, 112–116.Google Scholar

  • 15. Ding, J., Gidaspow, D., 1990. A bubbling fluidization model using kinetic theory of granular flow. AIChE Journal 36, 523–538.Google Scholar

  • 16. Drew, D.A., 1983. Mathematical modeling of two-phase flow. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 15, 261–291.Google Scholar

  • 17. Drew, D., Cheng, L., Lahey Jr, R.T., 1979. The analysis of virtual mass effects in two-phase flow. International Journal of Multiphase Flow 5, 233–242.Google Scholar

  • 18. Drew, D.A., Passman, S.L., 1998. Theory of Multicomponent Fluids, New York: Springer.Google Scholar

  • 19. Ekambara, K., Joshi, J.B., 2003. CFD simulation of mixing and dispersion in bubble columns. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 81, 987–1002.Google Scholar

  • 20. Elghobashi, S.E., Abou‐Arab, T.W., 1983. A two‐equation turbulence model for two‐phase flows. Physics of Fluids (1958–1988) 26, 931–938.Google Scholar

  • 21. Ervin, E.A., Tryggvason, G., 1997. The rise of bubbles in a vertical shear flow. Journal of Fluids Engineering, Transactions of the ASME 119, 443–449.Google Scholar

  • 22. Feng, W., Wen, J., Fan, J., Yuan, Q., Jia, X., Sun, Y., 2005. Local hydrodynamics of gas–liquid-nanoparticles three-phase fluidization. Chemical Engineering Science 60, 6887–6898.Google Scholar

  • 23. Gamwo, I.K., Halow, J.S., Gidaspow, D., Mostofi, R., 2003. CFD models for methanol synthesis three-phase reactors: reactor optimization. Chemical Engineering Journal 93, 103–112.Google Scholar

  • 24. Gidaspow, D., 1994. Multiphase Flow and Fluidization: Continuum and Kinetic Theory Descriptions, San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • 25. Grevskott, S., Sannæs, B.H., Duduković, M.P., Hjarbo, K.W., Svendsen, H.F., 1996. Liquid circulation, bubble size distributions, and solids movement in two- and three-phase bubble columns. Chemical Engineering Science 51, 1703–1713.Google Scholar

  • 26. Groen, J.S., Oldeman, R.G.C., Mudde, R.F., van den Akker, H.E.A., 1996. Coherent structures and axial dispersion in bubble column reactors. Chemical Engineering Science 51, 2511–2520.Google Scholar

  • 27. Gupta, H., Sorooshian, S., Yapo, P., 1999. Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: comparison with multilevel expert calibration. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 4, 135–143.Google Scholar

  • 28. Haider, A., Levenspiel, O., 1989. Drag coefficient and terminal velocity of spherical and nonspherical particles. Powder Technology 58, 63–70.Google Scholar

  • 29. Hamidipour, M., Chen, J., Larachi, F., 2012. CFD study on hydrodynamics in three-phase fluidized beds – application of turbulence models and experimental validation. Chemical Engineering Science 78, 167–180.Google Scholar

  • 30. Ishii, M., Mishima, K., 1984. Two-fluid model and hydrodynamic constitutive relations. Nuclear Engineering and Design 82, 107–126.Google Scholar

  • 31. Issa, R., Oliveira, P., 1993. Modelling of turbulent dispersion in two phase flow jets. Engineering Turbulence Modelling and Experiments 2, 947–957.Google Scholar

  • 32. Jianping, W., Shonglin, X., 1998. Local hydrodynamics in a gas-liquid-solid three-phase bubble column reactor. Chemical Engineering Journal 70, 81–84.Google Scholar

  • 33. Joshi, J., Sharma, M., 1979. A circulation cell model for bubble columns. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 57, 244–251.Google Scholar

  • 34. Krepper, E., Lucas, D., Prasser, H.-M., 2005. On the modelling of bubbly flow in vertical pipes. Nuclear Engineering and Design 235, 597–611.Google Scholar

  • 35. Kumar, A., Degaleesan, T.E., Laddha, G.S., Hoelscher, H.E., 1976. Bubble swarm characteristics in bubble columns. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 54, 503–508.Google Scholar

  • 36. Kumar, S., Ramkrishna, D., 1996. On the solution of population balance equations by discretization – I. A fixed pivot technique. Chemical Engineering Science 51, 1311–1332.Google Scholar

  • 37. Lahey Jr, R.T., Drew, D.A., The three-dimensional time and volume averaged conservation equations of two-phase flow, in: J.. Lewins and M.. Becker (Eds.), Advances in Nuclear Science and Technology, vol. 20: Springer US, 1988, 1–69.Google Scholar

  • 38. Lemoine, R., Behkish, A., Morsi, B.I., 2004. Hydrodynamic and mass-transfer characteristics in organic liquid mixtures in a large-scale bubble column reactor for the toluene oxidation process. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 43, 6195–6212.Google Scholar

  • 39. Li, G., Yang, X., Dai, G., 2009. CFD simulation of effects of the configuration of gas distributors on gas–liquid flow and mixing in a bubble column. Chemical Engineering Science 64, 5104–5116.Google Scholar

  • 40. Li, Y., Zhang, J., Fan, L.-S., 1999. Numerical simulation of gas–liquid–solid fluidization systems using a combined CFD-VOF-DPM method: bubble wake behavior. Chemical Engineering Science 54, 5101–5107.Google Scholar

  • 41. Liao, Y., Lucas, D., 2009. A literature review of theoretical models for drop and bubble breakup in turbulent dispersions. Chemical Engineering Science 64, 3389–3406.Google Scholar

  • 42. Lopez de Bertodano, M., Lahey Jr., R., Jones, O., 1994. Phase distribution in bubbly two-phase flow in vertical ducts. International Journal of Multiphase Flow 20, 805–818.Google Scholar

  • 43. Lun, C.K.K., Savage, S.B., 1986. The effects of an impact velocity dependent coefficient of restitution on stresses developed by sheared granular materials. Acta Mechanica 63, 15–44.Google Scholar

  • 44. Luo, H., Svendsen, H.F., 1991. Turbulent circulation in bubble columns from eddy viscosity distributions of single-phase pipe flow. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 69, 1389–1394.Google Scholar

  • 45. Luo, H., Svendsen, H.F., 1996. Theoretical model for drop and bubble breakup in turbulent dispersions. AIChE Journal 42, 1225–1233.Google Scholar

  • 46. L’Homme, G.A., 1978. Chemical Engineering of Gas-Liquid-Solid Catalyst Reactions: Proceedings of an International Symposium, Liege: CEBEDOC.Google Scholar

  • 47. Matonis, D., Gidaspow, D., Bahary, M., 2002. CFD simulation of flow and turbulence in a slurry bubble column. AIChE Journal 48, 1413–1429.Google Scholar

  • 48. Matos, E.M., Guirardello, R., Mori, M., Nunhez, J.R., 2009. Modeling and simulation of a pseudo-three-phase slurry bubble column reactor applied to the process of petroleum hydrodesulfurization. Computers & Chemical Engineering 33, 1115–1122.Google Scholar

  • 49. Millikan, C.B., Klein, A.L., 1933. The Effect of Turbulence. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 5, 169–174.Google Scholar

  • 50. Mitra-Majumdar, D., Farouk, B., Shah, Y.T., 1997. Hydrodynamic modeling of three-phase flows through a vertical column. Chemical Engineering Science 52, 4485–4497.Google Scholar

  • 51. Motaghi, M., Ulrich, B., Subramanian, A., 2011. Slurry-phase hydrocracking – possible solution to refining margins, Hydrocarbon Processing.

  • 52. Muthiah, P., Ponnusamy, K., Radhakrishnan, T.K., 2009. CFD modeling of flow pattern and phase holdup of three phase fluidized bed contactor. Chemical Product and Process Modeling 4, p. Art. 36.Google Scholar

  • 53. Nguyen, K.-T., Huang, S.-C., 2007. Simulation of hydrodynamic characteristics of glass beads in gas-liquid-solid three phase fluidized beds by computational fluid dynamics. Journal of Engineering Technology and Education 8, 248–261.Google Scholar

  • 54. Oey, R.S., Mudde, R.F., van den Akker, H.E.A., 2003. Sensitivity study on interfacial closure laws in two-fluid bubbly flow simulations. AIChE Journal 49, 1621–1636.Google Scholar

  • 55. O’Rourke, P.J., Zhao, P., Snider, D., 2009. A model for collisional exchange in gas/liquid/solid fluidized beds. Chemical Engineering Science 64, 1784–1797.Google Scholar

  • 56. Pan, Y., Banerjee, S., 1996. Numerical simulation of particle interactions with wall turbulence. Physics of Fluids (1994-Present) 8, 2733–2755.Google Scholar

  • 57. Panneerselvam, R., Savithri, S., Surender, G.D., 2009. CFD simulation of hydrodynamics of gas–liquid–solid fluidised bed reactor. Chemical Engineering Science 64, 1119–1135.Google Scholar

  • 58. Patankar, S., 1980. Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar

  • 59. Prince, M.J., Blanch, H.W., 1990. Bubble coalescence and break-up in air-sparged bubble columns. AIChE Journal 36, 1485–1499.Google Scholar

  • 60. Ranade, V.V., 2002. Computational Flow Modeling for Chemical Reactor Engineering, San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • 61. Rotta, J.C., 2010. Turbulente Strömungen: eine Einführung in die Theorie und ihre Anwendung vol. 8, Universitätsverlag Göttingen.

  • 62. Salmi, T.O., Mikkola, J.P., Warna, J.P., 2011. Chemical Reaction Engineering and Reactor Technology, Florida: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

  • 63. Schallenberg, J., Enß, J.H., Hempel, D.C., 2005. The important role of local dispersed phase hold-ups for the calculation of three-phase bubble columns. Chemical Engineering Science 60, 6027–6033.Google Scholar

  • 64. Schiller, L., Naumann, Z., 1935. A drag coefficient correlation. Zeitung Ver. Deutsch. Ing 77, 318–320.Google Scholar

  • 65. Sehabiague, L., Basha, O.M., Hong, Y., Morsi, B., Shi, Z., Jia, H., et al., 2015. Assessing the performance of an industrial SBCR for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis: Experimental and modeling. AIChE Journal 61, 3838–3857.Google Scholar

  • 66. Sehabiague, L., Lemoine, R., Behkish, A., Heintz, Y.J., Sanoja, M., Oukaci, R., et al., 2008. Modeling and optimization of a large-scale slurry bubble column reactor for producing 10,000bbl/day of Fischer–Tropsch liquid hydrocarbons. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Chemical Engineers 39, 169–179.Google Scholar

  • 67. Sehabiague, L., Morsi, B.I., 2013. Hydrodynamic and mass transfer characteristics in a large-scale slurry bubble column reactor for gas mixtures in actual Fischer–Tropsch cuts. International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering 11, 83–102.Google Scholar

  • 68. Silva Jr, J.L., Mori, E.D., Soccol Jr, R., d’Ávila, M.A., Mori, M., 2013. Interphase momentum study in a slurry bubble column. Chemical Engineering Transactions 32, 1507–1512.Google Scholar

  • 69. Sivaguru, K., Begum, K.M.M.S., Anantharaman, N., 2009. Hydrodynamic studies on three-phase fluidized bed using CFD analysis. Chemical Engineering Journal 155, 207–214.Google Scholar

  • 70. Smith, J.M., 1981. Chemical Engineering Kinetics, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

  • 71. Tomiyama, A., Tamai, H., Zun, I., Hosokawa, S., 2002. Transverse migration of single bubbles in simple shear flows. Chemical Engineering Science 57, 1849–1858.Google Scholar

  • 72. Troshko, A.A., Zdravistch, F., 2009. CFD modeling of slurry bubble column reactors for Fisher–Tropsch synthesis. Chemical Engineering Science 64, 892–903.Google Scholar

  • 73. van Sint Annaland, M., Deen, N.G., Kuipers, J.A.M., 2005. Numerical simulation of gas–liquid–solid flows using a combined front tracking and discrete particle method. Chemical Engineering Science 60, 6188–6198.Google Scholar

  • 74. Weissermel, K., Arpe, H.J., 2008. Industrial Organic Chemistry, Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.Google Scholar

  • 75. Wells, M.R., Stock, D.E., 1983. The effects of crossing trajectories on the dispersion of particles in a turbulent flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 136, 31–62.Google Scholar

  • 76. Wen, C.Y., Yu, Y.H., 1966. Mechanics of Fluidization. Chemical Engineering Progress Symposium Series 62, 100–111.Google Scholar

  • 77. Wiemann, D., Mewes, D., 2005. Calculation of flow fields in two and three-phase bubble columns considering mass transfer. Chemical Engineering Science 60, 6085–6093.Google Scholar

  • 78. Yu, Y.H., Kim, S.D., 1988. Bubble characteristics in the radial direction of three-phase fluidized beds. AIChE Journal 34, 2069–2072.Google Scholar

  • 79. Zehner, P., 1986a. Momentum, mass and heat transfer in bubble columns. Part 2. Axial blending and heat transfer. International Chemical Engineering 26, 29–35.Google Scholar

  • 80. Zehner, P., 1986b. Momentum, mass and heat transfer in bubble columns. Part 1. Flow model of the bubble column and liquid velocities. International Chemical Engineering 26, 22.Google Scholar

  • 81. Zhang, X., Ahmadi, G., 2005. Eulerian–Lagrangian simulations of liquid–gas–solid flows in three-phase slurry reactors. Chemical Engineering Science 60, 5089–5104.Google Scholar

  • 82. Zhang, S., Liu, D., Deng, W., Que, G., 2007. A review of slurry-phase hydrocracking heavy oil technology. Energy & Fuels 21, 3057–3062.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2016-02-09

Published in Print: 2016-04-01

Citation Information: International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering, Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 599–619, ISSN (Online) 1542-6580, ISSN (Print) 2194-5748, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijcre-2015-0165.

Export Citation

©2016 by De Gruyter.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Omar M. Basha and Badie I. Morsi
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2018

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in