Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering

Ed. by de Lasa, Hugo / Xu, Charles Chunbao

12 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.623
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.761

CiteScore 2016: 0.58

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.224
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.297

Online
ISSN
1542-6580
See all formats and pricing
More options …

CCS, A Needed Technology for the Mexican Electrical Sector: Sustainability and Local Industry Participation

José Miguel González Santaló
Published Online: 2016-06-10 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijcre-2016-0022

Abstract

The plans for developing the electrical sector in México are reviewed and compared with the targets set up for emissions and for participation of clean energies in the electrical generation considering a time horizon up to year 2050. The options required to meet the targets are discussed, with particular emphasis on the necessity for CCS. The electrical sector in México is one of fast growth, with the installed capacity essentially doubling over the next 15 years. This growth has to be compatible with the commitments that the country has made to reduce Green House Gas (GHG) emissions. Sector’s development strategy includes new technologies such as renewables, nuclear energy and Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS), in amounts larger than the minimum values established in the legislation. It is also concluded that CCS will be a necessity for Mexico. It is proposed that the energy policies to be established should be accompanied by industrial development policies, in order to maximize the participation of the Mexican Industry in the supply chain of the energy systems.

Keywords: carbon capture and storage; Mexican electrical sector; energy planning

References

  • 1. SaskPower CCS. Boundary Dam Carbon Capture Project. http://saskpowerccs.com/ccs-projects/boundary-dam-carbon-capture-project/.

  • 2. BP, 2014. Statistical Review of World Energy – 2014.

  • 3. Executive Office of the President of the United States, 2014. The cost of delaying action to stem climate change.

  • 4. Global CCS Institute, 2010. Defining CCS Ready: An Approach to an International Definition. http://www.globalccsinstitute.com/publications/defining-ccs-ready-approach-international-definition.

  • 5. Global CCS Institute, 2014. The Global Status of CCS-2014. http://www.globalccsinstitute.com/publications/global-status-ccs-2014.

  • 6. IEA, 2012. Energy Technology Perspectives 2012: Pathways to a Clean Energy System, OECD Publishing, Paris. doi: .Crossref

  • 7. IEA, 2014. World Energy Outlook 2014, IEA, Paris. doi: .Crossref

  • 8. IEA, 2007. Clean Coal Center: Post Combustion Carbon Capture from Coal Fired Power Plants – Solvent Scrubbing (Technical Study. Report).

  • 9. IEAghg, 2012. CO2 Capture at Gas Fired Power Plants, 2012/8.

  • 10. IEAghg, 2013. Post Combustion CO2 Capture Scale Study, 2013/05.

  • 11. Lacy, R., 2014. Life Cycle Analysis of Capture, Use and Storage of Carbon Dioxide in a Natural Gas Power Station for EOR. PhD Thesis. UAM.

  • 12. LAERFTE, 2008. Published in Diario Oficial de la Federación in November, 2008. Article 2, transitory.

  • 13. Ley de la Industria Eléctrica, 2014. Published in Diario Oficial de la Federación in August, 2014. Article 3.

  • 14. PECC, 2009. Programa Especial de Cambio Climático, DOF 28/08/2009.

  • 15. PRODESEN, 2015. SENER. Program for the Development of the National Electric Sector, 2015–2029.

  • 16. The World Bank. CO2 emissions. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.CO2E.PC.

About the article

Published Online: 2016-06-10

Published in Print: 2016-12-01


Citation Information: International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering, Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages 1277–1287, ISSN (Online) 1542-6580, ISSN (Print) 2194-5748, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijcre-2016-0022.

Export Citation

©2016 by De Gruyter. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in