Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering

Ed. by de Lasa, Hugo / Xu, Charles Chunbao


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.881
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.908

CiteScore 2017: 0.86

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.306
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.503

Online
ISSN
1542-6580
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 16, Issue 1

Issues

Volume 9 (2011)

Volume 8 (2010)

Volume 7 (2009)

Volume 6 (2008)

Volume 5 (2007)

Volume 4 (2006)

Volume 3 (2005)

Volume 2 (2004)

Volume 1 (2002)

Experimental Study of Batch Reactor Performance for Ethyl Acetate Saponification

Mohammed K. Al Mesfer
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, King Khalid University, Abha 61411, KSA
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2017-01-28 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijcre-2016-0174

Abstract

The objective of the current research work is to investigate the performance of batch reactor for saponification of ethyl acetate with sodium hydroxide. Temperature, volume of reaction mixture, rate of agitation, and initial concentration of reactants are the operating conditions considered for analysis. The NaOH concentration decreases from 1.13 × 10−2 mol/L to 0.57 × 10−2 mol/L when reaction temperature increases from 293 K to 313 K after the completion of the reaction. The conversion of NaOH increases with increased reaction temperature under the studied range of reaction temperatures until the stable condition is achieved. Reactant concentration declines with increased volume of reaction mixture from 1.2 L to 1.8 L. Sodium acetate concentration and reaction conversion decrease with increased volume of reaction mixture within the studied range. Concentration of sodium acetate decreases with increased rate of agitation. The conversion of sodium hydroxide declines with increased agitation rate from 70 rpm to 150 rpm. Higher initial reactant concentration leads to decreased reaction conversion. The results obtained may be used to optimize the production of ethanol and sodium acetate using saponification reaction.

Keywords: batch reactor; saponification; conversion; performance

References

  • Ahmad, A., M.I. Ahmad, M. Younas, H. Khan, and M.H. Shah. 2013. “A Comparative Study of Alkaline Hydrolysis of Ethyl Acetate Using Design of Experiments.” Iran. J. Chem. Chem. Eng. 32 (4): 33–44.Google Scholar

  • Bursali, N., S. Ertunc, and B. Akay. 2006. “Process Improvement Approach to Saponification Reaction Using Statistical Experimental Design.” Chem. Eng. Process 45 : 980–989.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Daniels, F., J. Mattews, and J. Williams. 1941. Experimental Physical Chemistry. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

  • Danish, M., M.K. Al Mesfer, and M.M. Rashid. 2015. “Effect of Operating Conditions on CSTR Performance: An Experimental Study.” Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl. 5 (2): 74–78.Google Scholar

  • Fogler, H.S.. 2006. Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering, Fourth edition. India: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

  • Garu, M.G., J.M. Nougues, and L. Puigjaner. 2002. “Comparative Study of Two Chemical Reactions with Different Behavior in Batch and Semibatch Reactors.” Chem. Eng. J 88 : 225–232.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kapoor, K.L.. 2004. A Textbook of Physical Chemistry. New Delhi: McMillan.Google Scholar

  • Kuheli, D., P. Sahoo, M. Saibaba, N. Murali, and P. Swaminthan. 2011. “Kinetic Studies on Saponification of Ethyl Acetate Using an Innovative Conductivity - Monitoring Instrument with a Pulsating Sensor.” Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 43 : 648–656.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Levenspiel, O.. 1999. Chemical Reaction Engineering, Third edition. NewYork: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

  • Li, H., Y. Meng, X. Li, and X. Gao. 2016. “A Fixed Point Methodology for the Design of Reactive Distillation Column.” Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 111 : 479–491.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mata-Segreda, J.F.. 2002. “Hydroxide as General Base in the Saponification of Ethyl Acetate.” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124 (10): 2259–2262.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mukhtar, A., U. Shafiq, A.F. Khan, H.A. Qadir, and M. Qizilbash. 2015. “Estimation of Parameters of Arrhenius Equation for Ethyl Acetate Saponification Reaction.” Res. J. Chem. Sci. 5 (11): 46–50.Google Scholar

  • Ortiz, M.I., A. Romero, and A. Irabien. 1989. “Integral Kinetic Analysis from Temperature Programmed Reaction Data: Alkaline Hydrolysis of Ethyl Acetate as Test Reaction.” Thermochim. Acta 141 : 169–180.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schneider, M.A., and F. Stoessel. 2005. “Determination of Kinetic Parameters Fast Chemical Reactions.” Chem. Eng. J. 115 : 73–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Theodorou, V., K. Skobridis, A.G. Tzakos, and V. Ragoussis. 2007. “A Simple Method for the Alkaline Hydrolusis of Esters.” Tetrahedron Lett 48 : 8230–8233.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tsujikawa, H., and H. Inoue. 1966. “The Reaction Rate of the Alkaline Hydrolysis of Ethyl Acetate.” Bull.Chem. Soc. Jpn. 39 : 1837–1842.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ullah, I., M.I. Ahmad, and M. Younas. 2015. “Optimization of Saponification Reaction in a Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor Using Design of Experiments.” Pak. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 16 : 84–92.Google Scholar

  • Walker, J.. 1906. “A Method of Determining Velocities of Saponification.” Proc. R. Soc. A78 : 157–160.Google Scholar

  • Wijayarathne, U.P.L., and K.C. Wasalathilake. 2014. “Aspen Plus Simulation of Saponification of Ethyl Actate in the Presence of Sodium Hydroxide in a Plug Flow Reactor.” J. Chem. Eng. Process Technol. 5 (6): 1–8.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-01-28


Citation Information: International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering, Volume 16, Issue 1, 20160174, ISSN (Online) 1542-6580, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijcre-2016-0174.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in