Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering

Ed. by de Lasa, Hugo / Xu, Charles Chunbao

12 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.881
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.908

CiteScore 2017: 0.86

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.306
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.503

Online
ISSN
1542-6580
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Ahead of print

Issues

Volume 9 (2011)

Volume 8 (2010)

Volume 7 (2009)

Volume 6 (2008)

Volume 5 (2007)

Volume 4 (2006)

Volume 3 (2005)

Volume 2 (2004)

Volume 1 (2002)

Signal Synthesis Model Reference Adaptive Controller with Artificial Intelligent Technique for a Control of Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor

Harsh Goud / Pankaj Swarnkar
Published Online: 2018-11-03 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijcre-2018-0145

Abstract

Modelling and controlling of Continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) is one of the major problems in the process industry. The nonlinear characteristic of CSTR may change the variation of temperature in either direction from the given set value. Chemical reactions within the CSTR depends on the given reference temperature. Such variation from reference values may result in degrading the variety of biomass. Design and implementation of the precise control device in such system are difficult for researchers. This paper proposes the MIT based control scheme as a solution to control problem of CSTR. An improvement of signal synthesis MIT system has been proposed in this study to enhance the steady-state and transient performance of CSTR. Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) based controller parameter tuning technique is applied to get the optimal performance of the controller. This paper shows the design and implementation of conventional PID tuned with the Z-N method, adaptive PID tune with ABC, MIT and ABC-MIT for CSTR. Detailed comparison based on simulation studies is presented which shows that ABC-MIT based control scheme improves the transient and steady state response.

Keywords: continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR); PID controller; model reference adaptive control; artificial bee colony (ABC)

References

  • Akay, Bahriye, and Dervis Karaboga. 2012. “A Modified Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm for Real-Parameter Optimization.” Information Sciences 192: 120–42.Google Scholar

  • Alleyne, Andrew, J, and Karl Hedrick. 1995. “Nonlinear Adaptive Control of Active Suspensions.” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 3: 94–101.Google Scholar

  • Bahita, M., and K. Belarbi. 2016. “Model Reference Neural-Fuzzy Adaptive Control of the Concentration in a Chemical Reactor (CSTR).” IFAC-PapersOnLine 49: 158–62.Google Scholar

  • Boroomand, Arefeh, and Mohammad Bagher Menhaj. 2009. “On-Line Nonlinear Systems Identification of Coupled Tanks via Fractional Differential Neural Networks.” Control and Decision Conference, 2009. Chinese: IEEE, CCDC'09.Google Scholar

  • Brown, M, and C. J. Harris. 1994. “Adaptive Neurofuzzy Systems for Difficult Modelling and Control Problems.” Advances in Neural Networks for Control and Systems, IEE Colloquium on. IET, 15–1.Google Scholar

  • Chang, Wei-Der. 2007. “Nonlinear System Identification and Control Using a Real-Coded Genetic Algorithm.” Applied Mathematical Modelling 31: 541–50.Google Scholar

  • Chang, Wei-Der, and Shun-Peng Shih. 2010. “PID Controller Design of Nonlinear Systems Using an Improved Particle Swarm Optimization Approach.” Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 15: 3632–39.Google Scholar

  • Chen, Chyi-Tsong, and Chyi-Shen Dai. 2001. “Robust Controller Design for a Class of Nonlinear Uncertain Chemical Processes.” Journal of Process Control 11: 469–82.Google Scholar

  • Daaou, Bachir, Abdellah Mansouri, Mohamed Bouhamida, and Mohammed Chenafa. 2012. “Development of Linearizing Feedback Control with a Variable Structure Observer for Continuous Stirred Tank Reactors.” Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering 20: 567–71.Google Scholar

  • El-Samahy, Adel A., and Mohamed A. Shamseldin. 2018. “Brushless DC Motor Tracking Control Using Self-Tuning Fuzzy PID Control and Model Reference Adaptive Control.” Ain Shams Engineering Journal 9: 341–52.Google Scholar

  • Goldberg, David E. 2006. Genetic Algorithms. New Delhi, India: Pearson Education India.Google Scholar

  • Jiang, Bo, and B. W. Wang. 2000. “Parameter Estimation of Nonlinear System Based on Genetic Algorithm.” International Journal of Control Theory and Applications 17: 150–52.Google Scholar

  • Kamalasadan, Sukumar, and Adel A Ghandakly. 2011. “A Neural Network Parallel Adaptive Controller for Fighter Aircraft Pitch-Rate Tracking.” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 60: 258–67.Google Scholar

  • Karaboga, Dervis, and Bahriye Akay. 2009. “A Comparative Study of Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm.” Applied Mathematics and Computation 214: 108–32.Google Scholar

  • Karaboga, Dervis, and Bahriye Basturk. 2007. “A Powerful and Efficient Algorithm for Numerical Function Optimization: Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) Algorithm.” Journal of Global Optimization 39: 459–71.Google Scholar

  • Karaboga, Nurhan. 2009. “A New Design Method Based on Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm for Digital IIR Filters.” Journal of the Franklin Institute 346: 328–48.Google Scholar

  • Kashan, Mina Husseinzadeh, Nasim Nahavandi, and Ali Husseinzadeh Kashan. 2012. “DisABC: A New Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm for Binary Optimization.” Applied Soft Computing 12: 342–52.Google Scholar

  • Lin, Feng, Robert D Brandt, and George Saikalis. 2000. “Self-Tuning of PID Controllers by Adaptive Interaction.” American Control Conference.5.Google Scholar

  • Liu, T-H., and H-H. Hsu. 2007. “Adaptive Controller Design for a Synchronous Reluctance Motor Drive System with Direct Torque Control.” IET Electric Power Applications 1: 815–24.Google Scholar

  • Miller, Daniel E., and Naghmeh Mansouri. 2010. “Model Reference Adaptive Control Using Simultaneous Probing, Estimation, and Control.” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 55: 2014–29.Google Scholar

  • Mohideen, K. Asan, G. Saravanakumar, K. Valarmathi, D. Devaraj, and T. K. Radhakrishnan. 2013. “Real-Coded Genetic Algorithm for System Identification and Tuning of a Modified Model Reference Adaptive Controller for a Hybrid Tank System.” Applied Mathematical Modelling 37: 3829–47.Google Scholar

  • Mungale, Niraj Rajendra, B. Akshay Upadhyay, and Jaganatha Pandian. 2017. “Self-Tuning Regulator for an Interacting CSTR Process.” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. IOP Publishing, 263.Google Scholar

  • Petchinathan, G., K. Valarmathi, D. Devaraj, and T. K. Radhakrishnan. 2014. “Local Linear Model Tree and Neuro-Fuzzy System for Modelling and Control of an Experimental pH Neutralization Process.” Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering 31: 483–95.Google Scholar

  • Pottman, Martin, and Dale E Seborg. 1992. “Identification of Non-Linear Processes Using Reciprocal Multiquadric Functions.” Journal of Process Control 2: 189–203.Google Scholar

  • Rajinikanth, V., and K. Latha. 2010. “Identification and Control of Unstable Biochemical Reactor.” International Journal of Chemical Engineering and Applications 1: 106.Google Scholar

  • Sahed, Oussama Ait, Kamel Kara, and Abousoufyane Benyoucef. 2015. “Artificial Bee Colony-Based Predictive Control for Non-Linear Systems.” Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control 37: 780–92.Google Scholar

  • Sánchez, Helem Sabina, Antonio Visioli, and Ramon Vilanova. 2017. “Optimal Nash Tuning Rules for Robust PID Controllers.” Journal of the Franklin Institute 354: 3945–70.Google Scholar

  • Soukkou, A., A. Khellaf, S. Leulmi, and K. Boudeghdegh. 2008. “Optimal Control of a CSTR Process.” Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering 25: 799–812.Google Scholar

  • Swarnkar, Pankaj, Shailendra Jain, and R. K. Nema. 2010. “Effect of Adaptation Gain on System Performance for Model Reference Adaptive Control Scheme Using MIT Rule.” World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 70: 621–26.Google Scholar

  • Swarnkar, Pankaj, Shailendra Jain, and R. K. Nema. 2014. “Adaptive Control Schemes for Improving the Control System Dynamics: A Review.” IETE Technical Review 31: 17–33.Google Scholar

  • Tasgetiren, M. Fatih, Quan KePan, P. N. Suganthan, and Adalet Oner. 2013. “A Discrete Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm for the No-Idle Permutation Flowshop Scheduling Problem with the Total Tardiness Criterion.” Applied Mathematical Modelling 37: 6758–79.Google Scholar

  • Tsai, Ching-Chih, and Chih-Hung Huang. 2004. “Model Reference Adaptive Predictive Control for a Variable-Frequency Oil-Cooling Machine.” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 51: 330–39.Google Scholar

  • Tsamatsoulis, D. C. 2014. “Optimizing the Control System of Cement Milling: Process Modeling and Controller Tuning Based on Loop Shaping Procedures and Process Simulations.” Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering 3: 155–70.Google Scholar

  • Wallam, Fahad, and Attaullah Y. Memon. 2017. “A Robust Control Scheme for Nonlinear Non-Isothermal Uncertain Jacketed Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor.” Journal of Process Control 51: 55–67.Google Scholar

  • Yuan, Zhihong, Bingzhen Chen, and Jinsong Zhao. 2011. “An Overview on Controllability Analysis of Chemical Processes.” AIChE Journal 57: 1185–201.Google Scholar

  • Zhu, Guopu, and Sam Kwong. 2010. “Gbest-Guided Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm for Numerical Function Optimization.” Applied Mathematics and Computation 217: 3166–73.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2018-06-09

Accepted: 2018-09-22

Revised: 2018-07-20

Published Online: 2018-11-03


Citation Information: International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering, 20180145, ISSN (Online) 1542-6580, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijcre-2018-0145.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in