Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

International Journal on Disability and Human Development

Official journal of the the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development in Israel

Editor-in-Chief: Merrick, Joav

Editorial Board Member: Brooks, Tony / Carmeli, BPT, Eliezer / Caron, MPH, Rosemary M. / Davidson, Philip W / Galil, Ahron / Heller, Tamar / Huff, Marlene B. / Janicki, Matthew P. / Kerr, Mike / Levy, Howard B / Lindström, Bengt / Morad, Mohammed / Omar, Hatim A. / Postolache, Teodor T. / Prasher, Vee / Shek, Daniel T.L. / Sher, Leo / Stratakis, Constantine A

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.25

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.179
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.234

Online
ISSN
2191-0367
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 13, Issue 2 (May 2014)

Issues

The Chinese Adolescent Materialism Scale: psychometric properties and normative profiles

Daniel T.L. Shek
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, P.R. China
  • Centre for Innovative Programmes for Adolescents and Families, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, P.R. China
  • Kiang Wu Nursing College of Macau, Macau, P.R. China
  • Department of Social Work, East China Normal University, P.R. China
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Cecilia M.S. Ma
  • Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, P.R. China
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Li Lin
  • Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, P.R. China
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2014-04-12 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijdhd-2014-0314

Abstract

Although a preoccupation with material possessions is a growing concern in Chinese adolescents, there is a lack of validated measures of adolescent materialism in different Chinese contexts. Based on a thorough literature review, the Chinese Adolescent Materialism Scale (CAMS) was developed and administered in 1658 Chinese secondary school students. Results showed that the CAMS was internally consistent. Factor analyses showed that three factors were intrinsic to the scale. Consistent with expectations, the CAMS scores were significantly related to measures of morality, egocentrism, spirituality, and empathy. Analyses of responses to the CAMS items revealed that a significant proportion of respondents displayed materialistic beliefs.

Keywords: Chinese adolescents; factor structure; materialism; psychometric properties; reliability; validity

References

  • 1.

    Belk RW. Three scales to measure constructs related to materialism: reliability, validity, and relationships to measures of happiness. Adv Consum Res 1984;11:291–7.Google Scholar

  • 2.

    Richins ML, Dawson S. Materialism as a consumer value: measure development and validation. J Consum Res 1992;19:303–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 3.

    Richins ML. The Material Values Scales: measurement properties and development of a short form. J Consum Res 2004;31:209–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 4.

    Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol 2000;55:68–78.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 5.

    Kasser T, Ryan RM. A dark side of the American dream: correlates of financial success as a central life aspiration. J Pers Soc Psychol 1993;65:410–22.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 6.

    Kasser T, Ryan RM. Further examining the American dream: differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 1996;22:280–7.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 7.

    Kasser T. The high price of materialism. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2002.Google Scholar

  • 8.

    Goldberg ME, Gorn GJ, Peracchio LA, Bamossy G. Understanding materialism among youth. J Consum Res 2003;13:278–88.Google Scholar

  • 9.

    Ku L, Dittmar H, Banerjee R. Are materialistic teenagers less motivated to learn? Cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence from the United Kingdom and Hong Kong. J Educ Psychol 2012;104:74–86.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 10.

    Williams GC, Hedberg VA, Cox EM, Deci EL. Extrinsic life goals and health – risk behaviors in adolescents. J Appl Soc Psychol 2000;30:1756–71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 11.

    John DR. Consumer socialization of children: a retrospective look at twenty-five years of research. J Consum Res 1999;26:183–213.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 12.

    Kasser T, Ryan RM, Couchman CE, Sheldon KM. Materialistic values: their causes and consequences. In: Kasser T, Kanner AD, editors. Psychology and consumer culture: the struggle for a good life in a materialistic world. Washington, DC: American Psychology Association, 2004:11–28.Google Scholar

  • 13.

    Schaefer AD, Hermans CM, Parker RS. A cross-cultural exploration of materialism in adolescents. Int J Consum Stud 2004;28:399–411.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 14.

    Lee TY, Shek DT, Kwong WM. Chinese approaches to understanding and building resilience in at-risk children and adolescents. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin North Am 2007;16:377–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 15.

    Commission on Youth. Youth in Hong Kong: a statistical profile 2010. Hong Kong: Hong Kong SAR, 2010. Available at: http://www.coy.gov.hk/filemanager/template/common/images/research/youth_report_20110520_c.pdf.

  • 16.

    Yip Y. Reasons for excessive consumption of young people. Sharp Daily. Available at: http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/news/art/20121101/18054379.

  • 17.

    Banerjee R, Dittmar H. Individual differences in children’s materialism: the role of peer relations. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2008;34:17–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 18.

    Kim H, Markus HR. Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. J Pers Soc Psychol 1999; 77:785–800.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 19.

    Chan K, Prendergast G. Materialism and social comparison among adolescents. Soc Behav Personal 2007;35:213–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 20.

    Chan K. Materialism among Chinese children in Hong Kong. Young Consum 2003;4:47–61.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 21.

    Shek DT. Adolescent developmental issues in Hong Kong: relevance to positive youth development programs in Hong Kong. J Adolesc Med Health 2006;18:341–54.Google Scholar

  • 22.

    Shek DT, Ma HK, Sun RC. A brief overview of adolescent developmental problems in Hong Kong. ScientificWorldJournal 2011;11:2243–56.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 23.

    Eastman JK, Fredenberger B, Campbell D, Calvert S. The relationship between status consumption and materialism: a cross-cultural comparison of Chinese, Mexican, and American students. J Market Theor Pract 1997;5:52–66.Google Scholar

  • 24.

    Moschis GP, Churchill GA Jr. Consumer socialization: a theoretical and empirical analysis. J Marketing Res 1978;15:599–609.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 25.

    Chowdhury RM, Fernando M. The role of spiritual well-being and materialism in determining consumers’ ethical beliefs: an empirical study with Australian consumers. J Bus Ethics 2013;113:61–79.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 26.

    Muncy JA, Eastman JK. Materialism and consumer ethics: an exploratory study. J Bus Ethics 1998;17:137–45.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 27.

    Giacalone RA, Jurkiewicz CL, Deckop JR. On ethics and social responsibility: the impact of materialism, postmaterialism, and hope. Hum Relat 2008;61:483–514.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 28.

    Roberts BW, Robins RW. Broad dispositions, broad aspirations: the intersection of personality traits and major life goals. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2000;26:1284–96.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 29.

    Konrath SH, O’Brien EH, Hsing C. Changes in dispositional empathy in American college students over time: a meta-analysis. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 2011;15:180–98.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 30.

    Sheldon KM, Kasser T. Coherence and congruence: two aspects of personality integration. J Pers Soc Psychol 1995;68:531–43.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 31.

    Humphries ML, Jagers RJ. Culture: a possible predictor of morality for African American adolescents. J Res Adolescence 2009;19:205–15.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 32.

    Schwartz SH. Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? J Soc Issues 1994;50:19–45.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 33.

    Schwartz SH. Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 1992;25:1–65.Google Scholar

  • 34.

    Burroughs JE, Rindfleisch A. Materialism and well-being: a conflicting values perspective. J Consum Res 2002;29:348–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 35.

    Shek DT. The spirituality of the Chinese people: a critical review. In: Bond MH, editor. Oxford Handbook of Chinese psychology. New York, NY: The Oxford University Press, 2010:343–66.Google Scholar

  • 36.

    Kilbourne W, Grünhagen M, Foley J. A cross-cultural examination of the relationship between materialism and individual values. J Econ Psychol 2005;26:624–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 37.

    Grouzet FM, Kasser T, Ahuvia A, Dols JM, Kim Y, Lau S, et al. The structure of goal contents across 15 cultures. J Pers Soc Psychol 2005;89:800–16.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 38.

    Kashdan TB, Breen WE. Materialism and diminished well-being: experiential avoidance as a mediating mechanism. J Soc Clin Psychol 2007;26:521–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 39.

    Stillman TF, Fincham FD, Vohs KD, Lambert NM, Phillips CA. The material and immaterial in conflict: spirituality reduces conspicuous consumption. J Econ Psychol 2012;33:1–7.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 40.

    Shek DT, Siu AM, Lee TY. The Chinese positive youth development scale: a validation study. Res Social Work Prac 2007;17:380–91.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 41.

    Fabrigar LR, Wegener DT, MacCallum RC, Strahan EJ. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychol Methods 1999;4:272–99.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 42.

    Curran PJ, West SG, Finch JF. The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychol Methods 1996;1:16–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 43.

    Finney SJ, DiStefano C. Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In: Hancock GR, Mueller RO, editors. Structural equation modeling: a second course. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, 2006:269–314.Google Scholar

  • 44.

    Schumacker RE, Lomax RG. A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling, 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004.Google Scholar

  • 45.

    Tanaka JS. Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation models. In: Bollen KA, Long JS, editors. Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993:10–39.Google Scholar

  • 46.

    Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling 1999;6:1–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 47.

    Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D. LISREL 8.80: structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International, 2006.Google Scholar

  • 48.

    Kaiser HF. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 1974;39:31–6.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 49.

    Pett MA, Lackey NR, Sullivan JJ. Making sense of factor analysis. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage, 2003.Google Scholar

  • 50.

    Widaman KF. Common factor analysis versus principal component analysis: differential bias in representing model parameters? Multivar Behav Res 1993;28:263–311.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 51.

    Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford, 1998.Google Scholar

  • 52.

    Hewitt PL, Blasberg JS, Flett GL, Besser A, Sherry SB, Caelian C, et al. Perfectionistic self-presentation in children and adolescents: development and validation of the Perfectionistic Self-Presentation Scale – Junior Form. Psychol Assess 2011;23:125–42.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 53.

    Mick DG. Are studies of dark side variables confounded by socially desirable responding? The case of materialism. J Consum Res 1996;23:106–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Corresponding author: Professor Daniel T.L. Shek, PhD, FHKPS, SBS, JP, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Room HJ407, Core H, Hunghom, Hong Kong, P.R. China, E-mail: ; and Centre for Innovative Programmes for Adolescents and Families, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, P.R. China; Kiang Wu Nursing College of Macau, Macau, P.R. China; Department of Social Work, East China Normal University, P.R. China


Received: 2013-01-24

Accepted: 2013-03-07

Published Online: 2014-04-12

Published in Print: 2014-05-01


Citation Information: International Journal on Disability and Human Development, ISSN (Online) 2191-0367, ISSN (Print) 2191-1231, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijdhd-2014-0314.

Export Citation

©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in