International Journal of Food Engineering
Editor-in-Chief: Chen, Xiao Dong
12 Issues per year
IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.685
CiteScore 2016: 0.73
SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.293
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.391
Hydration Kinetics of Rice Kernels under Vacuum and Pressure
Hydration of rough rice under vacuum (0.01, 0.03, 0.06, 0.08 MPa) and pressure (0.25, 0.4, 0.55 and 0.7 MPa) was conducted at 15°, 35° and 55°C. As a reference, hydration tests at each temperature and atmospheric pressure were also conducted. For vacuum and pressure tests the Peleg equation was found suitable to predict hydration kinetics of rice. Peleg constants, k1 and k2, inversely related to the absorption rate (q) and the saturation moisture content (me), respectively, were estimated. The response surface method (RSM) was used to optimize the effect of temperature and pressure on q, me and saturation time (tsat) for vacuum and pressure hydration. The predicted optimum conditions required to maximize absorption rate and saturation moisture content together with the minimization of saturation time, were: a) hydration at 55°C and 0.01 MPa for vacuum tests; and b) hydration at 55°C and 0.59 MPa for pressure tests. For vacuum hydration the optimum responses were: q = 6.01 (g water/g dry basis) min-1, me = 0.3488 (dry basis) and tsat = 58 minutes. For pressure hydration the optimum responses were: q = 6.98 (g water/g dry basis) min-1, me = 0.3839 (dry basis) and tsat = 42 minutes. Both procedures, vacuum and pressure hydration, resulted as more convenient than hydration at atmospheric pressure. However, pressure hydration conducted to a higher hydration rate and saturation moisture content needed less soaking time.
Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.