Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

International Journal of Legal Discourse

Editor-in-Chief: Cheng, Le

Managing Editor: Sun, Yuxiu

Online
ISSN
2364-883X
See all formats and pricing
More options …

The legal discourse in respect of the status of deserted Jewish wives-Agunot in light of Halachic-Jewish Law Responsa of Rabbi Yaakov Moshe Toledano

Moshe Ovadia
  • Corresponding author
  • Max Stern Yezreel Valley College, Upper Afula, Hazafon, Israel
  • Wingate Institute, Netanya, Israel
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2017-12-15 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2017-0008

Abstract

This article addresses The legal discourse in respect of the status of deserted Jewish Wives-Agunot in light of Halachic-Jewish Law Responsa of Rabbi Yaakov Moshe Toledano [Jewish legal] work Hayam Hagadol (Cairo, 1931) and Bat Ami (Tel Aviv 1947), which belongs to the category of Rabbinic Responsa. From these sources we learn of the legal discourse and his halachic approach in matters related to legal status of deserted Jewish wives (“Agunot”). From his responsa we learn of his use of the legal discourse, how he combined fully spelled out words and acronyms in Hebrew, the main language of his writings. He also used Aramaic, and foreign words written in Hebrew letters, as well as technical terms. We learn of his approach after he had meticulously studied halachic problems and issues, and combined halacha with historical events that impacted on the Jews over the centuries. Using these he issued halachic rulings. He used common sense, and did not rule out modern inputs, but rather addressed them and reached a halachic decision in order to provide his petitioners an adequate response. This article examines whether he was a strict rabbinic adjudicator or tended towards leniency.

Keywords: Toledano; Halachic-Jewish Law; Responsa; Agunot; Women; Jewish holocaust Rabbinical Court

References

  • Cronin, Vincent, Napoleon. 1991 Israel: Carni. (Hebrew).Google Scholar

  • Elon, Menachem, 1971. Jewish Law: History, Sources, Principles: Jerusalem: Magnes Press.Google Scholar

  • Elon, Menachem, 1981. Digest of the response literature of Spain and North Africa, Vol. 1–2, Jerusalem: Institute for research in Jewish Law and the Magnes press. (Hebrew).Google Scholar

  • Ettinger, Shmuel, (ed.), 1986. History of the Jews in the Islamic Countries, Jerusalem: Zalman Shazar, pp. 465–363. (Hebrew).Google Scholar

  • HaCohen, Aviad, The Tears of the Oppressed: An Examination of the Agunah Problem: Background and Halachic Sources, New York: Ktav, 2004.Google Scholar

  • Hasson, Jacques, 1988. “The Penetration of modernization into Jewish life in Egypt, 1870–1918”, in Yaakov Ben Michael Landau (ed.), The Jews in Ottoman Egypt, Jerusalem: Misgav, pp. 559–576. (Hebrew).Google Scholar

  • Lifshitz, Berachyahu, 1998. “The legal status of the responsa literature, Authority, Process and Method”, Studies in Jewish Law: Harwood Academic Publishers, pp. 59–100.Google Scholar

  • Ovadia, Moshe, 2003. Rabbi Yakov Moshe Toledano’s biography and his contribution to Jewish historiography, Thesis under the supervision of Professor Moshe Orfali, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan. (Hebrew).Google Scholar

  • Ovadia, Moshe, “The 1937 partition plan of Eretz Israel as viewed by Rabbi Yaakov Moshe Toledano”, Pe’amim 123–122 (2010), pp. 177–191. (Hebrew).Google Scholar

  • Ovadia, Moshe. 2013. “R. Yaakov Moshe Toledano-community service and literary creation in Tangier”, in Bar Asher Moshe, Amar Moshe & Shimon Sharvit (eds.), Fez and other Moroccan cities, A thousand years of creativity, Tel-Aviv: Bar Ilan University Press. pp. 349–357. (Hebrew).Google Scholar

  • Rabbinical Court in Istanbul, 1924. Machbehret Kiddushin Al tenai, Istanbul: Alchchir.Google Scholar

  • Tachorsh, Katriel, Fishel, “New Book on Problems of Agunot” “HaTzofeh”, edition 2797, Friday March 14, 1947, p.6 (Hebrew).Google Scholar

  • Tedghi, Joseph, 2015. “An unpublished responsum b R. Yoseph Messas about Jewish marriage contracts”, in Bar Asher Moshe & Steven D. Fraade (eds.), Studies in the culture of North African Jewry, Jerusalem: Magnes Press. pp. 141–192.Google Scholar

  • Toledano, Yaakov Moshe, 1931. Yam Hagadol, Cairo: Reuven M, Moscoates.Google Scholar

  • Toledano, Yaakov Moshe 1947. Bat-Ami, Tel-Aviv: Chief rabbinate. (Hebrew).Google Scholar

  • Vatikiotis, P.G., 1992. The history of modern Egypt, Britain: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

  • Zohar, Zvi, 1993. Tradition and change, Jerusalem: Ben-Zvi Institute. (Hebrew).Google Scholar

  • Zohar, Zvi, 2001a. “Halakhic and rabbinic literature in Egypt in the Last 250 Years”, Pe’amim 86–87, pp. 175–213. (Hebrew).Google Scholar

  • Zohar, Zvi, 2001b. The luminous face of the East. Israel: Hakibbutz Hameuchad. (Hebrew).Google Scholar

  • Zohar, Zvi, 2013. Rabbinic creativity in the modern Middle East: New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2016-05-26

Accepted: 2016-10-03

Published Online: 2017-12-15

Published in Print: 2018-08-28


Citation Information: International Journal of Legal Discourse, Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 159–171, ISSN (Online) 2364-883X, ISSN (Print) 2364-8821, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2017-0008.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in