Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship

Editor-in-Chief: Andrusyszyn, Mary-Anne

Ed. by Maltby, Hendrika J. / Babenko-Mould, Yolanda / Booth, Richard Garnet


CiteScore 2018: 1.31

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.574
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.847

Online
ISSN
1548-923X
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Co-supervision of Doctoral Students: Enhancing the Learning Experience

Pauline Paul
  • Corresponding author
  • Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy 11405, 87 Ave Edmonton, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 1C9
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Joanne K. Olson / Raisa B. Gul
Published Online: 2014-03-11 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnes-2012-0004

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine the advantages and challenges of co-supervision of doctoral students, as found in the literature and from our experiences. We define co-supervision and then discuss the process in detail. Examples are based on experiences of co-supervision from faculty perspectives as well as from the point of view of a former doctoral student. We propose that the advantages of co-supervision far outweigh the challenges and should be regularly considered by seasoned academics to enhance student learning. In addition, we suggest that co-supervision is intellectually stimulating for academics.

Keywords: co-supervision; doctoral education; graduate education; joint supervision; doctoral nursing education; supervision

References

  • Bourner, T., & Houghes, M. (1991). Joint supervision of research degrees: Second thoughts. Higher Education Review, 24(1), 21–34.Google Scholar

  • Brown, G., & Atkins, M. (1988). Effective teaching in higher education. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

  • Clark, C. (2008). The dance of incivility in nursing education as described by nursing faculty and students. Advances in Nursing Science, 31(4), E37–E54. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Delamont, S., Atkinson, P., & Parry, O. (2004). Supervising the doctorate – A guide to success. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar

  • Higgins, R., Hartley, P., & Skelton, A. (2001). Getting the message across: The problem of communicating assessment feedback. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(2), 269–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Holloway, I. (1995). Supervising nursing research projects:The case for qualitative research. Nurse Education Today,15(4), 257–262.Google Scholar

  • Ives, G., & Rowley, G. (2005). Supervisor selection or allocation and continuity of supervision: Ph.D. students’ progress and outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 30(5), 535–555. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nelson, M. L. & Friedlander, M. L. (2001). A close look atconflictual supervisory relationships: The trainee’s perspective. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48(4), 384–395. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Phillips, E. M., & Pugh, D. S. (1987). How to get a PhD: A handbook for students and their supervisors. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.Google Scholar

  • Phillips, E. M., & Pugh, D. S. (2000). How to get a PhD: A handbook for students and their supervisors. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar

  • Rugg, G., & Petre, M. (2004). The unwritten rules of PhD research. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar

  • Watts, J. H. (2010). Team supervision of the doctorate: Managing roles, relationships and contradictions. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(3), 335–339. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2014-03-11

Published in Print: 2014-01-01


Citation Information: International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 31–38, ISSN (Online) 1548-923X, ISSN (Print) 2194-5772, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnes-2012-0004.

Export Citation

©2014 by De Gruyter.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in