Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation

Editor-in-Chief: Birnir, Björn

Editorial Board: Armbruster, Dieter / Bessaih, Hakima / Chou, Tom / Grauer, Rainer / Marzocchella, Antonio / Rangarajan, Govindan / Trivisa, Konstantina / Weikard, Rudi

8 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.162

CiteScore 2017: 1.41

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.382
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.636

Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) 2017: 0.12

Online
ISSN
2191-0294
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 18, Issue 7-8

Issues

Self-Aeration Modelling Using a Sub-Grid Volume-Of-Fluid Model

Pedro Lopes
  • Corresponding author
  • MARE – Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
  • Department of Civil Engineering, University of Coimbra, Rua Luís Reis Santos, 3030-788 Coimbra, Portugal
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Jorge Leandro
  • MARE – Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, University of Coimbra, CoimbraPortugal
  • Chair of Hydrology and River Basin Management, Technical University of Munich, Arcisstraße 21, 80333 München, Germany
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Rita F. Carvalho
  • MARE – Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
  • Department of Civil Engineering, University of Coimbra, Rua Luís Reis Santos, 3030-788 Coimbra, Portugal
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2017-10-27 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnsns-2017-0015

Abstract

The accurate prediction of self-aerated flow is not always easy to obtain, particularly if the computational performance is the main concern. Two-fluid formulation is suitable to simulate the dispersed air in a continuous water phase (e.g. bubbly flows) in a fine mesh, whereas the interface tracking methods are used for sharp interfaces with two continuous and contiguous phases (e.g. free-surface flows). Several approaches have emerged to combine both methods; however all found a gap in the transition between resolved and unresolved scales of air at the interface. Including a source term that predicts the self-aeration process is viewed as a promising step to overcome such difficulty. In this work, we added to the volume-of-fluid formulation an extra advection-diffusion equation connected to a source of air at the free surface to simulate the dispersed bubble phase. One-way coupling and two-way coupling versions of this model are tested along with sensitivity tests to show the accuracy of the new source term that does not require calibration. The location of the aeration is analysed and investigated. Results are obtained in terms of free-surface flow depths, air–concentration profiles and velocity fields and compared to experimental data acquired in a scaled stepped spillway model with good agreement. The free-surface given by the air-entrainment model is in good agreement in both non-aerated and aerated zone of the spillway.

Keywords: air–water flow; air-entrainment; OpenFOAM®; self-aeration; stepped spillway; volume-of-fluid

References

  • [1]

    Deshpande S. S., Trujillo M. F., Wu X. and Chahine G., Computational and experimental characterization of a liquid jet plunging into a quiescent pool at shallow inclination, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow. 34 (2012), 1–14. .CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [2]

    Qu X., Khezzar L., Danciu D., Labois M. and Lakehal D., Characterization of plunging liquid jets: A combined experimental and numerical investigation, Int. J. Multiphase Flow. 37 (7) (2011), 722–731. .CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [3]

    Cerne G., S. Petelin and Tiselj I., Coupling of the Interface Tracking and the Two-Fluid Models for the Simulation of Incompressible Two-Phase Flow, J. Comput. Phy. 171 (2) (2001), 776–804. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [4]

    Yan K. and Che D., A coupled model for simulation of the gas - liquid two-phase flow with complex flow patterns, Int. J. Multiphase Flow. 36 (4) (2010), 333–348. .CrossrefWeb of Science

  • [5]

    Hänsch S., D. Lucas, E. Krepper and Höhne T., A multi-field two-fluid concept for transitions between different scales of interfacial structures, Int. J. Multiphase Flow. 47 (2012), 171–182. .CrossrefWeb of Science

  • [6]

    Hänsch S., Lucas D., Höhne T. and Krepper E., Application of a new concept for multi-scale interfacial structures to the dam-break case with an obstacle, Nucl. Eng. Des. 279 (2014), 171–181. .CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [7]

    Wardle K. E. and Weller H. G., Hybrid Multiphase CFD Solver for Coupled Dispersed / Segregated Flows in Liquid-Liquid Extraction, Int. J. Chem. Eng. (2013) (Article ID 128936). .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [8]

    Shonibare O. Y. and Wardle K. E., Numerical Investigation of Vertical Plunging Jet Using a Hybrid Multifluid – VOF Multiphase CFD Solver, Int. J. Chem. Eng. 2015 (Article ID 925639) (2015) 14. .CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [9]

    Hirt C. W., Modeling Turbulent Entrainment of Air at a Free Surface, Tech. rep. (2003).Google Scholar

  • [10]

    Moraga F. J., P. Carrica M., D. Drew A. and Lahey R. T., A sub-grid air entrainment model for breaking bow waves and naval surface ships, Comput. Fluids. 37 (3) (2008), 281–298. .CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [11]

    Ma J., A. Oberai, D. Drew, R. Lahey and Moraga F., A quantitative sub-grid air entrainment model for bubbly flows – plunging jets, Comput. Fluids 39 (1) (2010), 77–86. .CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [12]

    Sene K. J., Air entrainment by plunging jets, Chem. Eng. Sci. 43 (10) (1988), 2615–2623. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [13]

    Ervine D. A. and Falvey H. T., Behaviour of turbulent water jets in the atmosphere and in plunge pools., Ice Proc. 83 (1) (1987), 295–314. .Crossref

  • [14]

    Ma J., Oberai A. A., Drew D. A., Lahey R. T. and Hyman M. C., A comprehensive sub-grid air entrainment model for RaNS modeling of free-surface bubbly flows, J. Comput. Multiphase Flow. 3 (1) (2011), 41–56. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [15]

    Ma J., A. Oberai A., M. Hyman C., D. Drew A. and Lahey R. T., Two-Fluid Modeling of Bubbly Flows around Surface Ships Using a Phenomenological Subgrid Air Entrainment Model, Comput. Fluids 52 (1) (2011), 50–57. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [16]

    Ma J., A. Oberai A., R. Lahey T. and Drew D. A., Modeling Entrainment Air and Transport in a Hydraulic Jump using Two-Fluid RANS and DES Turbulence Models, Heat Mass Transfer. 47 (8) (2011), 911–919. .CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [17]

    Shi F., Kirby J. T. and Ma G., Modeling quiescent phase transport of air bubbles induced by breaking waves, Ocean Model. 35 (1–2) (2010), 105–117. .CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [18]

    airinterfoam, https://openfoamwiki.net/index.php/Contrib/airInterFoam.Google Scholar

  • [19]

    Hirt C. W. and Nichols B. D., Volume of Fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries, J. Comput. Phy. 39 (1981), 201–225. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [20]

    Weller H., A new approach to VOF-based interface capturing methods for incompressible and compressible flows, Report TR/HGW/04, OpenCFD Ltd.Google Scholar

  • [21]

    Brackbill J. U., Kothe D. B. and Zemach C., A continuum method for modeling surface tension, Journal of Computational Physics 100 (1991), 335–354. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [22]

    Menter F. R., Zonal two-equation k-ω turbulence model for aerodynamic flows, in: AIAA 24th Fluid Dynamics Conference, Orlando, Florida, 1993. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [23]

    Clift R., Grace J. R. and Weber M. E., Bubbles, Drops and Particles, New York, USA, 1978.Google Scholar

  • [24]

    Ervine D. A., McKeogh E. and Elsawy E. M., Effect of turbulence intensity on the rate of air entrainment by plunging water jets, Proc. Inst. Civil Eng. Part2 69 (1980), 425–445.Google Scholar

  • [25]

    Bombardelli F. A., I. Meireles and Matos J., Laboratory measurements and multi-block numerical simulations of the mean flow and turbulence in the non-aerated skimming flow region of steep stepped spillways, Environ. Fluid Mech. 11 (3) (2010), 263–288. .CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [26]

    Hirt C. W., Modeling Turbulent Entrainment of Air at a Free Surface, Tech. rep. (2012).Google Scholar

  • [27]

    Lopes P., Tabor G., Carvalho R. F. and Leandro J., Explicit calculation of natural aeration using a volume-of-fluid model, Appl. Math. Modell. 40 (17–18) (2016), 7504–7515. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [28]

    Chanson H., Air Bubble Entrainment In Free-Surface Turbulent Shear Flows, Academic Press, London, UK, 1997.Google Scholar

  • [29]

    Lopes P., J. Leandro, R. Carvalho F. and Bung D. B., Alternating skimming flow over a stepped spillway, Environ. Fluid Mech. .CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [30]

    Ryu Y., Chang K. and Lim H., Use of bubble image velocimetry for measurement of plunging wave impinging on structure and associated greenwater, Meas. Sci. Technol. 16 (10) (2005), 1945–1953. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [31]

    Versteeg H. K. and Malalasekera W., An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics – The Finite Volume Method, 2nd Edition, Pearson Education, 2007.Google Scholar

  • [32]

    Celik I. B., Ghia U., Roache P. J. and Freitas C. J., Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications, J. Fluids Eng. 130 (7). .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [33]

    Bung D. B., Developing flow in skimming flow regime on embankment stepped spillways, J. Hydraulic Res. 49 (5) (2011), 639–648. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [34]

    Nash J. E. and Sutcliffe J. V., River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I – A discussion of principles, J. Hydrol. 10 (3) (1970), 282–290. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [35]

    Pearson K., Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. III. Regression, Heredity and Panmixia, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 187 (1986), 253–318. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2017-01-18

Accepted: 2017-10-16

Published Online: 2017-10-27

Published in Print: 2017-12-20


This study had the support of FCT (Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology) through the Projects UID/MAR/04292/2013 and Grant SFRH/BD/85783/2012, financed by MEC (Portuguese Ministry of Education and Science) and FSE (European Social Fund), under the programs POPH/QREN (Human Potential Operational Programme from National Strategic Reference Framework) and POCH (Human Capital Operational Programme) from Portugal2020.


Citation Information: International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation, Volume 18, Issue 7-8, Pages 559–574, ISSN (Online) 2191-0294, ISSN (Print) 1565-1339, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnsns-2017-0015.

Export Citation

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in