Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

International Journal of the Sociology of Language

Founded by Fishman, Joshua A.

Ed. by Garcia Otheguy, Ofelia / Duchêne, Alexandre / Coulmas, Florian

6 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.53

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.505
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.716

Online
ISSN
1613-3668
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 2018, Issue 252

Issues

Tracing the “extinctness” of Tai Ahom: issues of language loss and death

Dipima BuragohainORCID iD: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1666-8390
Published Online: 2018-06-22 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2018-0020

Abstract

The extinction of Tai Ahom, a language from the Tai-Kadai family that was once spoken in Assam, India, can be contributed to a number of socio-historical, linguistic and cultural factors including the development and strong influence of Assamese, a language from the Indo-Aryan family spoken in that region. In an effort to examine the dynamics that contributed to the loss of Tai Ahom, the current article focuses on a descriptive overview of issues including language shift, variation, and extinction in the case of Tai Ahom. It will also highlight the factors which contributed to its shift and gradual extinction and discuss current efforts to revive the language.

Keywords: Tai Ahom; extinct language; language loss; language death; language revival

References

  • Buragohain, Dilip. 1999. Sanchipat Aru Ahom Jugar Puthi. Samannai. Sivasagar: Paper Hive.Google Scholar

  • Buragohain, Dipima. 2011. A Descriptive Grammar of Tai Ahom. Unpublished PhD Thesis. New Delhi: Jawaharlal Nehru University.Google Scholar

  • Buragohain, Dipima. 2013. Ancient Manuscript Literature in Tai Ahom. In Awadesh K Mishra, Melissa G Wallang & CH. Sarajubala Devi (eds.), Studies in Linguistics of the North-eastern Languages, 170–188. New Delhi: Lakshi Publishers.Google Scholar

  • Case, Anthea. 2015. The Endangered Archives Programme after ten years. In Maja Kominko (ed.), From Dust to Digital: Ten Years of the Endangered Archives Programme. Cambridge. Open Book Publishers.Google Scholar

  • Cerny, Miroslav. 2010. Language Death versus Language Survival: A Global Perspective. In Conference proceedings of Beyond Globalization: Exploring the Limits of Globalization in the Regional Context, 51–56. Ostrava: University of Ostrava.Google Scholar

  • Crystal, David. 2000. Language Death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Diller, Anthony. 1992. Tai languages in Assam: Daughters or ghosts. In C. J. Compton & J. F. Hartmann (eds.), Papers on Tai Languages, Linguistics and Literatures, 5–43. Northern Illinois University: Center for Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar

  • Dorian, Nancy C. 1978. The Fate of Morphological Complexity in Language Death: Evidence from East Sutherland Gaelic. Language 54(3). 590–609.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Duangthip, Rungkarn. 2013. Tai Ahom and standard Thai: A Descriptive-comparative study. Pune: Deccan College Post Graduate and Research Institute PhD thesis.Google Scholar

  • Edwards, John. 2010. Minority Languages and Group Identity: Cases and Categories. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Gawne, Lauren. 2015. Language documentation and division: Bridging the digital divide. Digital Studies 38(2). 292–318.Google Scholar

  • Gogoi, Nabami. 2013. Gender in Turung and Aiton language: A contrastive study. Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities 3(2). 308–318.Google Scholar

  • Gohain, Aimyakhang. 1997. Elementary Tai Primer with Grammar, Second. Dibrugarh: The Department of Assamese, Dibrugarh University.Google Scholar

  • Grenoble, Lenore A & Lindsay J Whaley. 2006. Saving Languages: An introduction to language revitalization. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Grierson, George A (ed.). 1903. Linguistic Survey of India. Vol.2. Mon-Khmer and Siamese-Chinese Families. Delhi: Low Price Publications.Google Scholar

  • Hazarika, Chow Nagen. 2004. Ahom Language: Its Typology, Language Contact and Historical Implications in Southeast Asian Languages. In S. Burusphat (ed.), Papers from the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, Tempe, Arizona. Arizona State University, Program for Southeast Asian Studies. 315–326.Google Scholar

  • Hornsby, Michael. 2015. The “new” and “traditional” speaker dichotomy: Bridging the gap. IJDL 231. 107–125.Google Scholar

  • Jaffe, Alexandra. 2015. Defining the new speaker: Theoretical perspectives and learner trajectories. IJDL 231. 21–44.Google Scholar

  • Kakati, Banikanta. 1941. Assamese: Its Formation and Development. Gauhati: Government of Assam.Google Scholar

  • Karna, Mahendra N. 1998. Social Movements in North-East India. New Delhi: Indus Publishing Company.Google Scholar

  • Khubchandani, Lachman. 1997. Revitalizing Boundaries: A Plurilingual Ethos. New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

  • King, Kendall A. 2001. Language Revitalization Processes and Prospects: Quichua in the Ecuadorian Andes. Clevedon: Cromwell Press.Google Scholar

  • Morey, Stephen. 2005a. The Tai Languages of Assam – A Grammar and Texts. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

  • Morey, Stephen. 2005b. Tonal change in the Tai languages of Northeast India. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 28. 2.Google Scholar

  • Morey, Stephen. 2011. Documentation of traditional songs and ritual texts: Issues for archiving. In N. Thieberger, L. Barwick & J. Vaughan (eds.), Sustainable data form digital research: Humanities perspectives on digital scholarship. A PARDISEC Conference, University of Melbourne, Australia: Custom Book Centre.Google Scholar

  • Morey, Stephen. 2013. Tai languages of Assam, a progress report – Does anything remain of the Tai Ahom language?. In D. Bradley & M. Bradley (eds.), Language Endangerment and Language Maintenance: An Active Approach. New York. Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Nartsupha, Chatthip & Ranoo Wichasin. 1995. The state of knowledge of Ahom history. Tai Culture 3(1). 3–36. Guwahati: Eastern Tai Literary Association.Google Scholar

  • Ó Hlfearnáin, Tadhg. 2015. Sociolinguistic vitality of Manx after extreme language shift: Authenticity without traditional native speakers. IJSL 231. 45–62.Google Scholar

  • O’Rourke, Bernadette & John Walsh. 2015. New speakers of Irish: Shifting boundaries across time and space. IJSL 231. 63–83.Google Scholar

  • Romaine, Suzzane. 2002. The impact of language policy on endangered languages. International Journal on Multicultural Societies 4(2). 1–28.Google Scholar

  • Saikia, Yasmin. 2004. Fragmented Memories: Struggling to be Tai Ahom in India. Durban: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

  • Sasse, Hans-Jurgen. 1992. Language decay and contact-induced change: Similarities and differences. In M. Brenzinger (ed.), Language Death: Factual and Theoretical Explorations with Special Reference to East Africa. Berlin. Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Sengupta, Madhumita. 2016. Becoming Assamese: Colonialism and new subjectivities in Northeast India. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • SIL International, 14th. 2002. Ethnologue: Languages of the World. <http://www.ethnologue.com/>

  • Terwiel, Barend Jan. 1983. Ahom and the Study of Early Tai Society. Journal of the Siam Society 42–62. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

  • Terwiel, Barend Jan & Ranoo Wichasin (eds.). 1992. Tai Ahoms and the Stars. Three Ritual Texts to Ward Off Danger. Cornell Southeast Asia Program.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-06-22

Published in Print: 2018-06-26


Citation Information: International Journal of the Sociology of Language, Volume 2018, Issue 252, Pages 163–177, ISSN (Online) 1613-3668, ISSN (Print) 0165-2516, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2018-0020.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in