Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

International Agrophysics

The Journal of Institute of Agrophysics of Polish Academy of Sciences

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.967
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.197

CiteScore 2016: 1.36

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.447
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.925

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-8725
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Biases in methane chamber measurements in peatlands

R. Juszczak
  • Corresponding author
  • Meteorology Department, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Piątkowska 94, 60-649 Poznań, Poland
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2013-04-20 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10247-012-0081-z

Abstract

The paper presents results of CH4 emission measurements at peatland with the application of the dynamic chamber technique. The measurements were conducted in two types of chambers differing in shape, height, volume and technology used to assure their tightness. The study tested how the following factors: 1) forced chamber headspace mixing or its absence, 2) mistakes of the person conducting measurements, 3) improper application of linear technique for calculating CH4 fluxes, and 4) simulated air sampling typical for static chambers, influence the significance of errors and the underestimation rate of CH4 fluxes measured in situ. It was indicated that chamber headspace mixing allows estimating methane fluxes with a smaller error than in the case of measurements conducted without mixing, and CH4 fluxes in such conditions can be 47 to 58% higher (depending on the chamber type) than in a chamber without fans. Using dynamic chambers and a fast analyzer to measure methane fluxes allows shortening the methane measurement process to a few minutes. On the other hand, using static chambers for methane flux measurements may lead to 70% underestimation of the calculated flux.

Keywords: chamber measurements; methane; flux calculation method; biases in chamber measurements

  • Beckmann M., Sheppard S.K., and Lloyd D., 2004. Mass spectrometric monitoring of gas dynamics in peat monoliths: effects of temperature and diurnal cycles on emissions. Atmospheric Environ., 38, 6907-6913.Google Scholar

  • Chojnicki B.H., 2013. The spectral estimation of wetland carbon dioxide exchange. Int. Agrophys., 27, 1-8.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Chojnicki B.H.,MichalakM.,AcostaM., JuszczakR., AugustinJ., Droesler M., and Olejnik J., 2010. Measurements of carbon dioxide fluxes by chamber method at Rzecin wetland ecosystem in Poland. Polish J. Environ. Stud., 19(2), 283-291.Google Scholar

  • Chojnicki B.H., Urbaniak M., Józefczyk D., Augustin J., andOlejnik J., 2007. Measurement of gas and heat fluxes a Rzecin wetland. In: Wetlands: Monitoring, Modelling and Management (Ed. T. Okruszko), Taylor and Francis Group Press, London, UK.Google Scholar

  • Christiansen J.R., Korhonen J., Juszczak R., Giebels M., andPihlatie M., 2011. Assessing the effects of chamber placement, manual sampling and headspace mixing onCH4 fluxes in a laboratory experiment. Plant Soil, 343, 171-185.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Conen F. and Smith K.A., 2000. An explanation of linear increases in gas concentration under closed chambers used to measure gas exchange between soil and the atmosphere. Eur. J. Soil Sci., 51, 111-117.Google Scholar

  • Davidson E.A., Savage K., Verchot L.V., and Navarro R., 2002. Minimizing artefacts and biases in chamber-based measurements of soil respiration. Agric. For. Met., 113, 21-37.Google Scholar

  • Eulenstein F., Leoeny J.,Chojnicki B.H.,KêdzioraA., and OlejnikJ., 2005. Analysis of the interrelation between the heat balance structure, type of plant cover and weather conditions. Int. Agrophysics, 19, 125-130.Google Scholar

  • Forbrich I.,Kutzbach L., HormannA., andWilmking M., 2010. A comparison of linear and exponential regression for estimating diffusive CH4 fluxes by closed-chambers in peatlands. Soil Biol. Biochem., 42, 507-515.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Goodrich J.P., Varner R.K., Frolking S., Duncan B.N., andCrill P.M., 2011. High-frequency measurements of methane ebullition over a growing season at a temperate peatland site. Geophys. Res. Letters, 38(7), 1-5.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Haapanala S., Rinne J., Pystynen K.H., Hellen H., Hakola H.,and Riutta T., 2006. Measurements of hydrocarbon emissions from boreal fen using the REA technique. Biogeosci., 3, 103-112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hutchinson G.L. and Livingston G.P., 2001. Vents and seals in non-steady-state chambers used for measuring gas exchange between soil and the atmosphere. Eur. J. Soil Sci., 52, 675-682.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Juszczak R., Acosta M., and Olejnik J., 2012a. Comparison of daytime and nighttime ecosystem respiration measured by the closed chamber technique on temperate mire in Poland. Polish J. Environ. Stud., 21(3), 643-658.Google Scholar

  • Juszczak R., Humphreys E., Acosta M., Michalak-GalczewskaM., Kayzer D., and Olejnik J., 2012b. Ecosystem respiration in a heterogeneous temperate peatland and its sensitivity to peat temperature and water table depth. Plant Soil, DOI 10.1007/s11104-012-1441-yCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kroon P.S.,HensenA.,Van denBulkW.C.M., Jongejan P.A.C.,and Vermeulen A.T., 2008. The importance of reducing the systematic error duet o non-linearity in N2O flux measurements by static chambers. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys., 82, 175-186.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Kutzbach L., Schneider J., Sachs T., Giebels M., Nykänen H.,Shurpali N.J.,Martikainen P.J.,Alm J., and WilmkingM.,2007. CO2 flux determination by closed-chamber methods can be seriously biased by inappropriate application of linear regression. Biogeosci., 4, 1005-1025.Google Scholar

  • Livingston G.P., Hutchinson G.L., and Spartalian K., 2005. Diffusion theory improves chamber-based measurements of trace gas emissions. Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L24817.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Olejnik J., Eulenstien F., Kêdziora A., and Werner A., 2001. Comparison of daily evapotranspiration rates obtained from water balance model and modified Bowen's ratio method. Int. Agrophysics, 15, 37-49.Google Scholar

  • Pihlatie M., Christiansen J. R., Aaltonen H., Korhonen J.,Nordbo A., Rasilo T., Benanti G., Giebels M., Helmy M.,Hirvensalo J., Jones S., Juszczak R., Klefoth R., Lobo doR. Vale, Rosa A. P., Schreiber P., Serça D., Vicca S., WolfB., and Pumpanen J., 2013. Comparison of static chambers to measure CH4 emissions from soils. Agric. Forest Meteorol., 171-172, 124-136.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Pumpanen J.,Kolari P., Ilvesniemi H.,MinkkinenK., VesalaT.,Niinisto S., Lohila A., Larmola T., Morero M., PihlatieM., Janssens I., Yuste J.C.,Grunzweig J.M., Reth S., SubkeJ.A., Savage K., Kutsch W., Ostreng G., Ziegler W.,Anthoni P., Lindroth A., and Hari P., 2004. Comparison of different chamber techniques for measuring soil CO2 efflux. Agric. For. Met., 123, 159-176.Google Scholar

  • Rinne J., Riutta T., Pihlatie M., Aurela M., Haapanala S.,Tuovinen J-P., Tuittila E-S., and Vesala T., 2007. Annual cycle of methane emission from a boreal fen measured by the eddy covariance technique. Tellus, 59(3), 449-457.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Strack M., Waller MF., and Waddington J., 2005. Dynamics of biogenic gas bubbles in peat and their effects on peatland biogeochemistry. Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 19, 1-9.Google Scholar

  • Tokida T.,MizoguchiM., Miyazaki T.,Kagemoto A., NagataO.,and Hatano R., 2007. Episodic release of methane bubbles frompeatland during spring thaw.Chemosphere, 70, 165-171.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2013-04-20

Published in Print: 2013-03-01


Citation Information: International Agrophysics, ISSN (Print) 0236-8722, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10247-012-0081-z.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Krystyna Milecka, Grzegorz Kowalewski, Barbara Fiałkiewicz-Kozieł, Mariusz Gałka, Mariusz Lamentowicz, Bogdan H Chojnicki, Tomasz Goslar, and Jan Barabach
The Holocene, 2017, Volume 27, Number 5, Page 651
[2]
Xueyang Yu, Changchun Song, Li Sun, Xianwei Wang, Fuxi Shi, Qian Cui, and Wenwen Tan
Atmospheric Environment, 2017, Volume 153, Page 135
[3]

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in