Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Intercultural Pragmatics

Editor-in-Chief: Kecskes, Istvan

5 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.769
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.120

CiteScore 2016: 0.72

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.286
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.827

Online
ISSN
1613-365X
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 9, Issue 2

Issues

On normative cognition, and why it matters for cognitive pragmatics

PhD Antonella Carassa, / Professor of Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Engineering Marco Colombetti,
Published Online: 2012-05-29 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2012-0015

Abstract

In Cognitive pragmatics: The mental processes of communication (2011), Bruno Bara presents a detailed summary of a theory of human communication, called “cognitive pragmatics,” which he has been developing since the 1980s together with a number of colleagues, and has been presented in several scientific articles and in a recent book (Bara 2010). The basic tenets of this theory are that communication is a cooperative activity, in which human agents engage intentionally, and that for communication to take place successfully all the participants must share certain mental states. Coherently with these assumptions, cognitive pragmatics aims at clarifying what mental states are constitutive of communication, and what cognitive structures underlie the cooperative activities involved in communication.

To this position we are strongly sympathetic. However, we think that the theoretical framework currently offered by cognitive pragmatics is inadequate to account for the cooperative nature of human communication. In particular, we believe that to deal with human cooperation, the types of mental states considered by cognitive pragmatics should be extended; that the concepts of conversation and behavior game do not adequately explain the dynamics of human communication; and that the role of communicative intentions is not sufficiently clarified.

In this commentary we first discuss the issue of collective activities (Section 1). Next we consider some problems related to conversation and behavior games (Section 2), and bring in the issue of normativity, that we consider as a crucial component of human interaction (Section 3). We then discuss the relationship between communicative intentions and normativity (Section 4), and finally draw some conclusions (Section 5).

About the article

PhD Antonella Carassa,

Antonella Carassa has a MSc in Communication Technology and a PhD in Cognitive Psychology. Formerly Professor of Artificial Intelligence at University of Padua, she is currently Professor of Psychology at the Faculty of Communication Sciences, University of Lugano. She is mainly interested in the pragmatics of interpersonal communication, in the analysis of talking work and of mother-child interaction, and in theories of human intersubjectivity.

Professor of Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Engineering Marco Colombetti,

Marco Colombetti got his MSc in Electronics from Politecnico di Milano. He is Professor of Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Engineering at Politecnico di Milano, and of Information Technology at the Faculty of Communication Sciences, University of Lugano. His is currently interested in modeling communication processes, between both human and artificial agents.


Published Online: 2012-05-29

Published in Print: 2012-05-25


Citation Information: , Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages 271–280, ISSN (Online) 1613-365X, ISSN (Print) 1612-295X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2012-0015.

Export Citation

©[2012] by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in