Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Intercultural Pragmatics

Editor-in-Chief: Kecskes, Istvan


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.125
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.154

CiteScore 2017: 1.25

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.719
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.417

Online
ISSN
1613-365X
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 12, Issue 2

Issues

“Swear words” and “curse words” in Australian (and American) English. At the crossroads of pragmatics, semantics and sociolinguistics

Cliff Goddard
Published Online: 2015-05-22 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2015-0010

Abstract

This study seeks to show that Natural Semantic Metalanguage (NSM) analytical techniques allow an integrated semantic-pragmatic approach to the use of “swear words” and “curse (cuss) words”. The paper begins with a semantic exegesis of the lexical items swear word and curse word. This is helpful to delimit and conceptualize the phenomena being studied, and it also hints at some interesting differences between the speech cultures of Australian English and American English. Subsequent sections propose semantic explications for a string of swear/curse words and expressions as used in Australian English, including: exclamations (Shit! Fuck! Damn! Christ! Jesus!), abuse formulas (Fuck you!, Damn you!), interrogative and imperative formulas (e.g. Who the fuck do you think you are?; Get the hell out of here!), and the free use of expressive adjectives, such as fucking and goddamn, in angry swearing. A novel aspect, with interesting implications for the relationship between semantics and pragmatics, is that the explications incorporate a metalexical awareness section, modelling speaker awareness of the ethnometapragmatic status of the word in the community of discourse. The study goes on to address so-called “social/conversational” swearing. I propose cultural scripts to capture some Anglo ethnopragmatic assumptions about how the use of swear/curse words can be affected by perceptions of familiarity, solidarity, and mutuality. Differences between Australian English and American English are discussed at various points.

References

  • Allan, Keith & Kate Burridge. 1991. Euphemism and dysphemism. Language used as shield and weapon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Allan, Keith & Kate Burridge. 2006. Forbidden words. Taboo and the censoring of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Allan, Keith & Kate Burridge. 2009. Swearing. In Pam Peters, Peter Collins, & Adam Smith (eds.), Comparative grammatical studies on Australian and New Zealand English, 361–386. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Ameka, Felix K. 1992. Interjections: The universal yet neglected part of speech. Journal of Pragmatics 18(2/3). 101–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baker, Sidney J. 1960. The Australian language, 2nd edn. Melbourne: Sun Books.Google Scholar

  • Beers Fägersten, Kristy. 2012. Who’s swearing now? The social aspects of conversational swearing. Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar

  • Blakemore, Diane. 2014. Slurs and expletives: A case against a general account of expressive meaning. Language Sciences. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.06.018

  • Bromhead, Helen. 2009. The reign of truth and faith: Epistemic expressions in 16th and 17th century English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Cameron, Deborah. 2003. Gender language ideologies. In Janet Holmes & Miriam Meyerhoff (eds.), Handbook of language and gender. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Coates, Jennifer. 2003. Men talk: Stories in the making of masculinities. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Croom, Adam M. 2011. Slurs. Language Sciences 33. 343–358.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Croom, Adam M. 2013. How to do things with slurs: Studies in the way of derogatory words. Language and Communication 33. 177–204.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Croom, Adam M. 2014a. The semantics of slurs: A refutation of pure expressivism. Language Sciences 41. 227–242.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Croom, Adam M. 2014b. Slurs, stereotypes, and in-equality: A critical review of “How Epithets and Stereotypes are Racially Unequal”. Language Sciences. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.03.001

  • Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Cunningham, Valentine. 2007. Poubellication: In the lexical dunny with the furphy king from down under. In Mina Gorji (ed.), Rude Britannia, 35–55. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Goddard, Cliff (ed.). 2006. Ethnopragmatics: Understanding discourse in cultural context. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Goddard, Cliff. 2009. Not taking yourself too seriously in Australian English: Semantic explications, cultural scripts, corpus evidence. Intercultural Pragmatics 6(1). 29–53.Google Scholar

  • Goddard, Cliff. 2010. Semantic molecules and semantic complexity (with special reference to “environmental” molecules). Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 8(1). 123–155.Google Scholar

  • Goddard, Cliff. 2011a. Semantic analysis: A practical introduction (Revised 2nd edn.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Goddard, Cliff. 2011b. The lexical semantics of ‘language’ (with special reference to ‘words’). Language Sciences 33(1). 40–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goddard, Cliff. 2012. ‘Early interactions’ in Australian English, American English, and English English: Cultural differences and cultural scripts. Journal of Pragmatics 44. 1038–1050.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goddard, Cliff. 2013. The semantic roots and cultural grounding of “social cognition”. Australian Journal of Linguistics 33(3). 245–256.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goddard, Cliff. 2014a. Interjections and emotions (with special reference to “surprise” and “disgust”). Emotion Review 6(1). 53–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goddard, Cliff. 2014b. Jesus! vs. Christ! in Australian English: Semantics, secondary interjections and corpus analysis. In Jesús Romero-Trillo (ed.), Yearbook of corpus linguistics and pragmatics 2014. New empirical and theoretical paradigms, 55–77. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Goddard, Cliff (with Zhengdao Ye). 2014c. Ethnopragmatics. In Farzad Sharifian (ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and culture, 66–83. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Goddard, Cliff & Anna Wierzbicka (eds.). 2002. Meaning and universal grammar – Theory and empirical findings, 2 vols. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Goddard, Cliff & Anna Wierzbicka (eds.). 2004. Cultural scripts. [Special Issue] Intercultural Pragmatics 1(2).Google Scholar

  • Goddard, Cliff & Anna Wierzbicka. 2014. Words and meanings. Lexical semantics across domains, languages, and cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Gustafson, Sandra M. 2011. Imagining deliberative democracy in the early American Republic. Chicago: University Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Habib, Sandy. 2011. Contrastive lexical-conceptual analysis of folk religious concepts in Arabic, Hebrew, and English: NSM approach. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of New England, Armidale.Google Scholar

  • Hill, Deborah. 1992. Imprecatory interjectional expressions: Examples from Australian English. Journal of Pragmatics 18. 209–223.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Holmes, Janet & Stubbe, M. 2003. Power and politeness in the workplace: A sociolinguistic analysis of talk at work. London: Pearson.Google Scholar

  • Hughes, Geoffrey. 1998. Swearing: A social history of foul language, oaths, and profanities in English. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Jay, Timothy. 1992. Cursing in America. A psycholinguistic study of dirty language in the courts, in the movies, in the schoolyards and on the streets. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Jay, Timothy. 2000. Why we curse. A neuro-psycho-social theory of speech. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Jay, Timothy & Kristan Janschewitz. 2008. The pragmatics of swearing. Journal of Politeness Research 4. 267–288Google Scholar

  • Kidman, Angus. 1993. How to do things with four-letter words: A study of the semantics of swearing in Australia. BA Honours Thesis. University of New England. [http://www.gusworld.com.au/nrc/thesis/intro.htm]PubMed

  • Levisen, Carsten. 2012. Cultural semantics and social cognition: A case study on the Danish universe of meaning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Ljung, Magnus. 2011. Swearing: A cross-cultural linguistic study. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Malouf, David. 2004. Made in England: Australia’s British inheritance. Quarterly Essay 12. 1–66.Google Scholar

  • McEnery, Tony. 2006. Swearing in English: Bad language, purity and power from 1586 to the present. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • McEnery, Anthony & Zhonghua Xiao. 2004. Swearing in Modern British English: The Case of Fuck in the BNC. Language and Literature 13(3). 235–268.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mohr, Melissa. 2013. Holy Sh*t: A brief history of swearing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Moore, Bruce. 2010. What’s their story?: A history of australian words. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Musgrave, Simon and Kate Burridge. 2014. Bastards and buggers – Historical snapshots of Australian English swearing patterns. In Kate Burridge & Réka Benczes (eds.), Wrestling with words and meanings: Essays in Honour of Keith Allan, 3–32. Melbourne: Monash University Press.Google Scholar

  • Niedzielski, N. A. & D. R. Preston. 2007. Folk pragmatics. In J. Verschueren & J.-O. Östman in collaboration with E. Versluys (eds.), Handbook of pragmatics, 146–155. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Norrick, Neal R. 2009. Interjections as pragmatic markers. Journal of Pragmatics 41. 866–891.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Peeters, Bert (ed.). 2006. Semantic primes and universal grammar: Evidence from the Romance languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Rowen, Roslyn. 2012. “Shit bloke! You’re always geeing me up like that”. A lexical semantic analysis of negative personal descriptors and “jocular” speech-act verbs in informal Australian English. BA Hons Thesis. Griffith University.Google Scholar

  • Silverstein, Michael. 2003. Talking politics: The substance of style from Abe to “W”. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.Google Scholar

  • Stapleton, Karyn. 2003. Gender and swearing: A community practice. Women and Language 26. 22–33.Google Scholar

  • Stapleton, Karyn. 2010. Swearing. In Miriam Locher & S. L. Graham (eds.), The handbook of pragmatics, Vol. 9 (Interpersonal Pragmatics), 289–306. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Stollznow, Karenina. 2002. Terms of Abuse in Australian English: A study of semantics and usage. BA Hons thesis: University of New England.Google Scholar

  • Taylor, B. A. 1975. Towards a structural and lexical analysis of “swearing” and the language of abuse in Australian English. Linguistics 16(4). 17–43.Google Scholar

  • Van Lancker, D. & J. L. Cummings. 1999. Expletives: neurolinguistic and neurobehavioral perspectives on swearing. Brain Research Review 31(1). 83–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wajnryb, Ruth. 2005. Expletive deleted. A good look at bad language. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

  • Wierzbicka, Anna. 1987. English speech act verbs: A semantic dictionary. Sydney: Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • Wierzbicka, Anna. 1991. Cross-cultural pragmatics: The semantics of human interaction (expanded 2nd edn., 2003) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Wierzbicka, Anna. 1992. Australian b-words (bloody, bastard, bugger, bullshit): An expression of Australian culture and national character. In André Clas (ed.), Le mot, les mots, les bons mots/Word, words, witty words. A Festschrift for Igor A. Mel’cuk, 21–38. Montreal: Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal.Google Scholar

  • Wierzbicka, Anna. 1996. Semantics: Primes and universals. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Wierzbicka, Anna. 1997. Understanding cultures through their key words. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Wierzbicka, Anna. 2002. Australian cultural scripts – bloody revisited. Journal of Pragmatics 34. 1167–1209.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wierzbicka, Anna. 2011. Common language of all people: the innate language of thought. Problems of Information Transmission 47. 378–397. [English translation of a Russian text in Problemy Peredachi Informatsii 47(4). 84–103.]CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wierzbicka, Anna. 2014a. Imprisoned in English: The hazards of English as a default language. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Wierzbicka, Anna. 2014b. Language and cultural scripts. In Farzad Sharifian (ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and culture. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Wong, Jock O. 2014. The culture of Singapore English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Ye, Zhengdao. 2004. Chinese categorization of interpersonal relationships and the cultural logic of Chinese social interaction: An indigenous perspective. Intercultural Pragmatics 1(2). 211–230.Google Scholar

  • Ye, Zhengdao. 2007. ‘Memorisation’, learning and cultural cognition: The notion of bèi (‘auditory memorisation’) in the written Chinese tradition. In Mengistu Amberber (ed.), The language of memory in a crosslinguistic perspective, 127–169. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Ye, Zhengdao (ed.). In press. The semantics of nouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

About the article

Cliff Goddard

Cliff Goddard is Professor of Linguistics at Griffith University. He is a leading proponent of the Natural Semantic Metalanguage approach to semantics and its sister theory, the cultural scripts approach to pragmatics. His major publications include the edited volumes Ethnopragmatics (2006 Mouton de Gruyter), Cross-Linguistic Semantics (2008, John Benjamins) and Semantics and/in Social Cognition (2013, special issue of Australian Journal of Linguistics), the textbook Semantic Analysis (2nd ed., 2011 OUP), and Words and Meanings: Lexical Semantics Across Domains, Languages and Cultures (co-authored with Anna Wierzbicka; OUP 2014).


Published Online: 2015-05-22

Published in Print: 2015-06-01


Citation Information: Intercultural Pragmatics, Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages 189–218, ISSN (Online) 1613-365X, ISSN (Print) 1612-295X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2015-0010.

Export Citation

©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[2]
Patricia Rosenberg, Sverker Sikström, and Danilo Garcia
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 2017, Volume 36, Number 3, Page 306
[3]
International Journal of Language and Culture, 2015, Volume 2, Number 2, Page 142

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in