Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Intercultural Pragmatics

Editor-in-Chief: Kecskes, Istvan

5 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.125
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.154

CiteScore 2017: 1.25

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.719
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.417

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 13, Issue 2


A cross-cultural analysis of disagreements in classroom discourse: Comparative case studies from England, the United States, and Israel

Hadar Netz / Adam Lefstein
Published Online: 2016-06-07 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2016-0009


How do cultural and institutional factors interact in shaping preference structures? This paper presents a cross-cultural analysis of disagreements in three different classroom settings: (1) a year 6 (ages 11–12) mainstream class in England, (2) a fifth-grade class of gifted students in the United States, and (3) a fourth-grade mainstream class in Israel. The aim of the study is to investigate how disagreements are enacted in these settings, exploring the influence of cultural communicative norms on the one hand and pedagogical goals and norms on the other. The study highlights culture-specific discursive patterns that emerge as the teacher and students manage a delicate balance between often clashing cultural and educational motives.

Keywords: disagreement; classroom discourse; cultural norms; pedagogic goals; cross-cultural analysis


  • Alexander, Robin J. 2001. Culture and pedagogy: International comparisons in primary education. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Alexander, Robin. J. 2004. Towards dialogic thinking: Rethinking classroom talk, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Dialogos.Google Scholar

  • Alexander, Robin J. 2012. Moral panic, miracle cures and educational policy: What can we really learn from international comparison? Scottish Educational Review 44(1). 4–21.Google Scholar

  • Angouri, Jo. 2012. Managing disagreement in problem solving meeting talk. Journal of Pragmatics 44(12). 1565–1579.Google Scholar

  • Angouri, Jo & Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini. 2011. “So what problems bother you and you are not speeding up your work?”: Problem solving talk at work. Discourse and Communication 5(3). 209–229.Google Scholar

  • Angouri, Jo & Miriam A. Locher. 2012. Theorizing disagreement. Journal of Pragmatics 44(12). 1549–1553.Google Scholar

  • Angouri, Jo & Theodora Tseliga. 2010. “You have no idea what you are talking about”: From e-disagreement to e-impoliteness in two online fora. Journal of Politeness Research 6(1). 57–82.Google Scholar

  • Applebee, Arthur N., Judith A. Langer, Martin Nystrand & Adam Gamoran. 2003. Discussion-based approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instruction and student performance in middle and high school English. American Educational Research Journal 40(3). 685–730.Google Scholar

  • Arcidiacono, Francesco & Clotilde Pontecorvo. 2009. Cultural practices in Italian family conversations: Verbal conflict between parents and preadolescents. European Journal of Psychology of Education 24(1). 97–117.Google Scholar

  • Blum-Kulka, Shoshana. 1997. Dinner talk: Cultural patterns of sociability and socialization in family discourse. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

  • Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Menahem Blondheim & Gonen Hacohen. 2002. Traditions of dispute: From negotiations of Talmudic texts to the arena of political discourse in the media. Journal of Pragmatics 34. 1569–1594.Google Scholar

  • Boyd, Maureen Patricia & William C. Markarian. 2011. Dialogic teaching: Talk in service of a dialogic stance. Language and Education 25(6). 515–534.Google Scholar

  • Brendefur, Jonathan & Jeffrey Frykholm. 2000. Promoting mathematical communication in the classroom: Two perspective teachers’ conceptions and practices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 3. 125–153.Google Scholar

  • Brigham, Frederick J. & Jeffrey P. Bakken. 2014. Assessment of individuals who are gifted and talented. In Jeffrey P. Bakken, Festus E. Obiakor & Anthony F. Rotatori (eds.), Gifted education: Current perspectives and issues (Advances in Special Education 26), 21–40. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.Google Scholar

  • Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Cazden, Courtney B. 1988. Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar

  • Cheng, Winnie & Amy B. M. Tsui. 2009. “Ahh ((laugh)) well there is no comparison between the two I think”: How do Hong Kong Chinese and native speakers of English disagree with each other? Journal of Pragmatics 41. 2365–2380.Google Scholar

  • Chinn, Clark A., Richard C. Anderson & Martha A. Waggoner. 2001. Patterns of discourse in two kinds of literature discussion. Reading Research Quarterly 36(4). 378–411.Google Scholar

  • Corsaro, William A. & Thomas A. Rizzo. 1990. Disputes in the peer culture of American and Italian nursery-school children. In Allen D. Grimshaw (ed.), Conflict talk, 21–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Dori-Hacohen, Gonen. 2012. Types of interaction on Israeli political radio phone-in programs and their relations to the public sphere. Javnost – The Public 19(3). 21–40.Google Scholar

  • Drew, Paul & John Heritage. 1992. Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In Paul Drew and John Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, 3–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Du Bois, John W. 2006. Comparison of transcription symbols. http://www.linguistics.ucsb.edu/projects/transcription/representing (accessed March 2015).

  • Du Bois, John W. 2007. The stance triangle. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Edstrom, Anne. 2004. Expressions of disagreement by Venezuelans in conversation: Reconsidering the influence of culture. Journal of Pragmatics 36. 1499–1518.Google Scholar

  • Edwards, Anthony Davies & David P. G. Westgate. 1994. Investigating classroom talk, 2nd edn. London: Falmer.Google Scholar

  • Feniger, Yariv & Adam Lefstein. 2014. How not to reason with PISA data: An ironic investigation. Journal of Education Policy 29(6). 845–855.Google Scholar

  • Flyvbjerg, Bent. 2001. Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Galton, Maurice, Linda Hargreaves, Chris Comber, Debbie Wall & Tony Pell. 1999. Changes in patterns of teacher interaction in primary classrooms: 1976–96. British Educational Research Journal 25(1). 23–37.Google Scholar

  • García, Carmen. 1989. Disagreeing and requesting by Americans and Venezuelans. Linguistics and Education 1. 299–322.Google Scholar

  • Georgakopoulou, Alexandra. 2001. Arguing about the future: On indirect disagreements in conversations. Journal of Pragmatics 33. 1881–1900.Google Scholar

  • Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction ritual: Essays on face to face behavior. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar

  • Goodwin, Marjorie Harness. 1983. Aggravated correction and disagreement in children’s conversations. Journal of Pragmatics 7. 657–677.Google Scholar

  • Greatbatch, David. 1992. On the management of disagreement between news interviewees. In Paul Drew & John Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, 268–301. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Gutiérrez, Kris D. & Joanne Larson. 1994. Language borders: Recitation as hegemonic discourse. International Journal of Educational Reform 3(1). 22–36.Google Scholar

  • Gutiérrez, Kris, Betsy Rymes & Joanne Larson. 1995. Script, counterscript, and underlife in the classroom: James Brown versus Brown v. Board of Education. Harvard Educational Review 65. 445–471.Google Scholar

  • Hacohen, Gonen. 2001. Jewish argumentation: Conversational features of two forms of arguments in Israel [Hebrew]. Jerusalem: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem MA thesis.

  • Hall, Joan Kelly & Meghan Walsh. 2002. Teacher-student interaction and language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 22. 186–203.Google Scholar

  • Kakava, Christina. 2002. Opposition in Modern Greek discourse: Cultural and contextual constraints. Journal of Pragmatics 34. 1537–1568.Google Scholar

  • Kangasharju, Helena. 2002. Alignment in disagreement: Forming oppositional alliances in committee meetings. Journal of Pragmatics 34. 1447–1471.Google Scholar

  • Katriel, Tamar. 1986. Talking straight: Dugri speech in Israeli Sabra culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Koshik, Irene. 2002. Designedly incomplete utterances: A pedagogical practice for eliciting knowledge displays in error correction sequences. Research on Language and Social Interaction 35(3). 277–309.Google Scholar

  • Knuth, Eric & Dominic Peressini. 2001. Unpacking the nature of discourse in mathematics classrooms. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School 6(5). 320–325.Google Scholar

  • Kreutel, Karen. 2007. “I’m not agree with you.”: ESL learners’ expressions of disagreement. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language 11(3). 1–23.Google Scholar

  • Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar

  • Lefstein, Adam & Julia Snell. 2011. Classroom discourse: The promise and complexity of dialogic practice. In Sue Ellis, Elspeth McCartney & Jill Bourne (eds.), Insight and impact: Applied linguistics and the primary school, 165–185. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Lefstein, Adam & Julia Snell. 2014. Better than best practice: Developing teaching and learning through dialogue. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Lemke, Jay, L. 1982. Classroom communication of science. Final report submitted to the National Science Foundation, April.

  • Littleton, Karen & Christine Howe. 2010. Educational dialogues: Understanding and promoting productive interaction. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Locher, Miriam A. 2004. Power and politeness in action: Disagreements in oral communication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Lotman, Yury M. 1988. Text within a text. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology 26(3). 32–51.Google Scholar

  • Maíz-Arévalo, Carmen. 2014. Expressing disagreement in English as a lingua franca: Whose pragmatic rules? Intercultural Pragmatics 11(2). 199–224.Google Scholar

  • Margutti, Piera. 2006. “Are you human beings?”: Order and knowledge construction through questioning in primary classroom interaction. Linguistics and Education 17. 313–346.Google Scholar

  • Margutti, Piera. 2010. On designedly incomplete utterances: What counts as learning for teachers and students in primary classroom interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 43(4). 315–345.Google Scholar

  • Marra, Meredith, 2012. Disagreeing without being disagreeable: Negotiating workplace communities as an outsider. Journal of Pragmatics 44(12). 1580–1590.Google Scholar

  • Mehan, Hugh, 1979. Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Mercer, Neil & Karen Littleton. 2007. Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Meyer, Heinz-Dieter & Aaron Benavot. 2013. PISA, power and policy: The emergence of global educational governance. Oxford: Symposium Books.Google Scholar

  • Mitchell, J. Clyde. 1983. Case and situation analysis. Sociological Review 31(2). 187–211.Google Scholar

  • Mithun, Marianne. 2012. Tags: Cross-linguistic diversity and commonality. Journal of Pragmatics 44. 2165–2182.Google Scholar

  • Mori, Junko. 1999. Negotiating agreement and disagreement in Japanese: Connective expressions and turn construction. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Muntigl, Peter & William Turnbull. 1998. Conversational structure and facework in arguing. Journal of Pragmatics 29. 225–256.Google Scholar

  • Myers, Greg. 2004. Matters of opinion: Talking about public issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Netz, Hadar. 2014a. Disagreement patterns in gifted classes. Journal of Pragmatics 61. 142–160.Google Scholar

  • Netz, Hadar. 2014b. Gifted conversations: Discursive patterns in gifted classes. Gifted Child Quarterly 58(2). 149–163.Google Scholar

  • Netz, Hadar. 2016. Designedly Incomplete Utterances and student participation. Linguistics and Education 33. 56–73.Google Scholar

  • Nystrand, Martin, Adam Gamoran, Robert Kachur & Catherine Prendergast. 1997. Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

  • Osborne, Jonathan, Sibel Erduran & Shirley Simon. 2004. Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41(10). 994–1020.Google Scholar

  • Paramasivam, Shamala. 2007. Managing disagreement while managing not to disagree: Polite disagreement in negotiation discourse. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research 36(2). 91–116.Google Scholar

  • Peled-Elhanan, Nurit & Shoshana Blum-Kulka. 2006. Dialogue in the Israeli classroom: Types of teacher-student talk. Language and Education 23(1). 3–54.Google Scholar

  • Pollak, Itay, Aliza Segal & Adam Lefstein. 2015. Pedagogy in Israel: Activity and discourse in classrooms. Be’er Sheva: Laboratory for the Study of Pedagogy, Department of Education, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev.Google Scholar

  • Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA). 2005. Opening up talk (DVD). London: QCA.Google Scholar

  • Rees-Miller, Janie. 2000. Power, severity, and context in disagreement. Journal of Pragmatics 32. 1087–1111.Google Scholar

  • Sacks, Harvey. 1987 [1973]. On the preference for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In Graham B. Button & John R. E. Lee (eds.), Talk and social organization, 54–69. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1980. Preliminaries to preliminaries: “Can I ask you a question?” Social Inquiry 50(3/4). 104–152.Google Scholar

  • Schiffrin, Deborah, 1984. Jewish argument as sociability. Language in Society 13. 311–335.Google Scholar

  • Seedhouse, Paul. 2004. The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Sellar, Sam & Bob Lingard. 2013. The OECD and global governance in education. Journal of Education Policy 28(5).710–725.Google Scholar

  • Sifianou, Maria. 2012. Disagreements, face and politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 44(12). 1554–1564.Google Scholar

  • Sinclair, John M. H. & Malcolm Coulthard. 1975. Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Longman.Google Scholar

  • Smith, Fay, Frank Hardman, Kate Wall & Maria Mroz. 2004. Interactive whole class teaching in the National Literacy and Numeracy Strategies. British Educational Research Journal 30(3). 395–411.Google Scholar

  • Takahashi, Tomoko & Leslie Beebe. 1993. Cross-linguistic influence in the speech act of correction. In Gabriele Kasper & Shoshana Blum-Kulka (eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics, 138–157. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Tannen, Deborah. 1981. New York Jewish conversational style. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 30. 133–149.Google Scholar

  • Tannen, Deborah, 2002. Agonism in academic discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 34. 1651–1669.Google Scholar

  • Tannen, Deborah & Christina Kakava. 1992. Power and solidarity in Modern Greek conversation: Disagreeing to agree. Journal of Modern Greek Studies 10. 11–34.Google Scholar

  • Wells, Gordon. 1999. Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Wells, Gordon & Rebeca Mejía-Arauz. 2006. Dialogue in the classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences 15(3). 379–428.Google Scholar

  • Wertsch, James V. 1991. Voices of the mind: Sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

About the article

Hadar Netz

Hadar Netz is a Lecturer in the Program for Multilingual Education of the School of Education at Tel-Aviv University. Her main research interests are classroom discourse and its relation to learning opportunities as well as social issues in the encoding of gender in discourse.

Adam Lefstein

Adam Lefstein is Associate Professor in Education at the Ben-Gurion University of the Negev in Israel and Director of the Laboratory for the Study of Pedagogy. He researches pedagogy, classroom interaction, teacher learning, and educational change. His book Better than best practice: Developing teaching and learning through dialogue, co-written with Julia Snell, was published in 2014 by Routledge.

Published Online: 2016-06-07

Published in Print: 2016-06-01

Citation Information: Intercultural Pragmatics, Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 211–255, ISSN (Online) 1613-365X, ISSN (Print) 1612-295X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2016-0009.

Export Citation

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in