Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching

Ed. by Jordens, Peter / Roberts, Leah

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2015: 0.800
Rank 72 out of 179 in category Linguistics in the 2015 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Social Sciences Edition

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.911
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.965
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.860

Online
ISSN
1613-4141
See all formats and pricing

 


Select Volume and Issue

Issues

The relative efficacy of explicit and implicit feedback in the learning of a less-commonly-taught foreign language

Hyun-Sook Kang
Published Online: 2009-10-04 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2009.013

Abstract

In an attempt to test the generalizability of the role and contributions of interactional feedback in second language acquisition, this study examines the issue in the context of learning Korean as a less-commonly-taught foreign language at the post-secondary level. Further, it looks into the explicitness of feedback as a factor in foreign language learning. While explicit feedback contains an alternative correct form, along with metalinguistic comments on a learner's non-target-like form, implicit feedback partially or fully repeats or reformulates a learner's ill-formed utterance with no reference to the source of the non-target-like form. Thirty-four English-speaking learners of Korean were randomly assigned to the following groups: (1) explicit feedback; (2) implicit feedback; and (3) no feedback (control). The research design of pre-test – post-test – delayed post-test consisting of one grammaticality judgment test and one picture description test was utilized. Analyses of the results showed that the experimental groups outperformed the control group, which supports the beneficial role of feedback in the context of learning Korean as a foreign language. There was no statistically significant difference between explicit vs. implicit feedback in facilitating learner knowledge of the target form. The findings provide support for the potential benefits of implicit feedback without interrupting the flow of conversation during dyadic interaction. Implications for further research on interactional feedback and its explicitness are discussed.


Published Online: 2009-10-04

Published in Print: 2009-10-01


Citation Information: IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. Volume 47, Issue 3-4, Pages 303–324, ISSN (Online) 1613-4141, ISSN (Print) 0019-042X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2009.013, October 2009

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.