Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching

Ed. by Jordens, Peter / Roberts, Leah

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.545

CiteScore 2016: 0.49

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.279
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.269

Online
ISSN
1613-4141
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 55, Issue 3 (Sep 2017)

Issues

A multimodal approach to investigating temporality expression in L2: What does gesture analysis reveal?

Inès Saddour
Published Online: 2017-09-16 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2017-0112

Abstract

Research on temporality expression has had a prolific history within second language acquisition (SLA) research and has provided a clear picture of temporal and aspectual (henceforth Tem) markers and their order of emergence and development in L2 acquisition. However, most of the studies have only examined speech and neglected the gestural modality. This study is an attempt to fill this gap and contribute to the relatively recent investigation of L2 gestures; examining with a combinative approach Tem devices in speech and the gestures produced concomitantly with those linguistic markers in longitudinal video-recorded narratives produced by four low-proficiency tutored French second language (L2) learners. Our results suggest that speech and gesture form an interconnected system and that gestures play a function in dealing with the abstract domain of temporal reference in early SLA. Analyses reveal that L2 learners do not gesture randomly when expressing Tem values. Their gestures co-occurring with different types of Tem linguistic devices are generally different in proportion, duration and type. Gestures are more frequent in non-finite uninflected verbal contexts. Additionally, they are often iconic and last longer on average than those produced simultaneously with verbal morphology or with adverbials. Differences in gesture rate, duration and nature in the different marking contexts and over the data collection period of 5 months suggest that gesturing may help to reduce the cognitive load brought about by the complexity of morphological marking, and may therefore be used strategically to handle hesitant Tem devices in speech in early SLA.

Keywords: temporality; L2 gestures; multimodality; French L2 acquisition

References

  • Alibali, Martha W., Sotaro Kita & Amanda J. Young. 2000. Gesture and the process of speech production: We think, therefore we gesture. Language and Cognitive Processes 15(6). 593–613.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bartning, Inge. 2009. The advanced learner variety: 10 years later. In Emmanuelle Labeau & Florence Myles (eds.), The Advanced Learner Variety : The case of French, 11–40. Germany: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

  • Bartning, Inge & Suzanne Schlyter. 2004. Itinéraires acquisitionnels et stades de développement en français L2. French Language Studies 14. 281–299.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bhadwaj, Mangat, Rainer Dietrich & Colette Noyau (eds.). 1988. Second Language Acquisition by Adult Immigrants : Temporality. Strasbourg: European Science Foundation.Google Scholar

  • Butterworth, Brian & Uri Hadar. 1989. Gesture, speech, and computational stages: A reply to McNeill. Psychological Review 96(1). 168–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Butterworth, Brian & Uri Hadar. 1997. Iconic gestures, imagery and word retrieval in speech. Semiotica 115. 147–172.Google Scholar

  • Dietrich, Rainer, Wolfgang Klein & Colette Noyau. 1995. The Acquisition of Temporality in a Second Language. Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Duncan, Susan D. 2002. Gesture, verb aspect, and the nature of iconic imagery in natural discourse. Gesture 2(2). 183–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goldin-Meadow, Susan, Howard Nusbaum, Spencer D. Kelly & Susan Wagner. 2001. Explaining math: Gesturing lightens the load. American Psychological Society 12(6). 516–522.Google Scholar

  • Gullberg, Marianne. 1998. Gesture as a communication strategy in second language discourse : A study of learners of French and Swedish. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar

  • Gullberg, Marianne. 1999. Communication strategies, gestures and grammar. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangère 2. 61–71.Google Scholar

  • Gullberg, Marianne. 2005. L’expression orale et gestuelle de la cohésion dans le discours de locuteurs langue 2 débutants. Acquisition et interaction en langue étrangère 23. 153–172.Google Scholar

  • Gullberg, Marianne. 2006. Handling discourse: Gestures, reference tracking, and communication strategies in early L2. Language Learning 56(1). 155–196.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gullberg, Marianne. 2009. Gestures and the development of semantic representations in first and second language acquisition. Language Interaction and Acquisition 1. 117–139.Google Scholar

  • Gullberg, Marianne. 2014. Gestures and second language acquisition. In Cornelia Müller, Alan J. Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silvia H. Ladewig, David McNeill & Jana Bressem (eds.), Body - language - communication : An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction, 1868–1875. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

  • Gullberg, Marianne & Steven McCafferty. 2008. Introduction to gesture and SLA: Towards an integrated approach. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 30. 133–146.Google Scholar

  • Kendon, Adam. 2000. Language and gesture: Unity or duality. In David McNeill (ed.), Language and Gesture, 47–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Kendon, Adam. 2004. Gesture : Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Kita, Sotaro. 2000. How representational gestures help speaking. In David McNeill (ed.), Language and Gesture, 162–185. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Kita, Sotaro & Asli Özyürek. 2003. What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal?: Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language 48. 16–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Klein, Wolfgang. 1994. Time in Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Klein, Wolfgang & Clive Perdue. 1997. The basic variety (or: Could not languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research 13(4). 301–347.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lausberg, Hedda & Han Sloetjes. 2009. Coding gestural behavior with the NEUROGES-ELAN system. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 41(3). 841–849. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Matlock, Teenie, David Sparks, Justin L. Matthews, Jeremy Hunter & Stephanie Huette. 2012. Smashing new results on aspectual framing: How people talk about car accidents. Studies in Language 36(3). 700–721.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • McNeill, David. 1992. Hand and mind: What the hands reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • McNeill, David. 2005. Gesture and Thought. USA: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • McNeill, David & Susan D. Duncan. 2000. Growth points in thinking-for-speaking. In David McNeill (ed.), Language and Gesture, 141–161. Cambridge: Cambridge University.Google Scholar

  • Noyau, Colette. 1990. The development of means for temporality in the guided acquisition of L2: Cross-linguistic perspectives. In Hans. W. Dechert (ed.), Current Trends in European Second Language Acquisition Perspectives, 143–170. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

  • Ruiter, Jan-Peter de. 2000. The production of gesture and speech. In David McNeill (ed.), Language and Gesture, 284–311. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Stam, Gale. 2012. Gestes et recherche lexicale en langue seconde. In Robert Vion, Alain Giacomi & Claude Vargas (eds.), La Lorporalité du langage : Multimodalité, Discours et Ecriture. Aix-en-Provence: Presses Universitaires de Provence.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-09-16

Published in Print: 2017-09-26


Citation Information: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, ISSN (Online) 1613-4141, ISSN (Print) 0019-042X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2017-0112.

Export Citation

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in