Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching

Ed. by Jordens, Peter / Roberts, Leah


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.667
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.296

CiteScore 2018: 1.02

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.891
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.341

Online
ISSN
1613-4141
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 57, Issue 2

Issues

Factors in language learning after 40: Insights from a longitudinal study

Olga Kozar / Lynda Yates
Published Online: 2019-05-23 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2015-0113

Abstract

This study seeks to identify differences in language learning progress and experiences among 24 adult migrants, who arrived to Australia after the age of 40. The results suggest that age per se was not a reliable predictor of language learning progress. Instead, the initial English level of participants when they arrived to Australia, opportunities to use English and prior level of education were associated with considerable language learning gains. For example, participants who had a higher initial English level were able to find jobs that required them to perform a range of oral and written tasks across different domain, which further improved their level, while participants who had a low initial level were mostly unemployed. Another common factor we noted among participants with high and reasonable gains but not among those who made little progress was a proactive attitude and the use of a range of language learning strategies beyond the classroom. The study also revealed differences in age construal among participants with high and reasonable gains and those who did not improve.

Keywords: age; language learning; sociolinguistics; learners over 40; factors in SLA

Note

[Correction added after online publication 19 July 2017: 3rd paragraph of the introduction, 3rd paragraph of the ‘Perspectives on age’, 7th paragraph of the ‘Perspectives on age’ and 1st paragraph of the ‘Adult immigrants and language learning’ were edited to improve the text.]

References

  • Allender, S. C. 1998. Adult ESL learners with special needs: Learning from the Australian perspective. Washington: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.Google Scholar

  • Alley, D., K. Suthers & E. Crimmins. 2007. Education and cognitive decline in older Americans results from the AHEAD sample. Research on aging 29(1). 73–94.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Andersson, F., M. Garcia-Perez, J. Haltiwanger, K. McCue & S. Sanders. 2014. Workplace concentration of immigrants. Demography 51(6). 2281–2306.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ardila, A., F. Ostrosky-Solis, M. Rosselli & C. Gómez. 2000. Age-related cognitive decline during normal aging: The complex effect of education. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 15(6). 495–513. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baker, W. 2010. Effects of age and experience on the production of English word-final stops by Korean speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 13(03). 263–278.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bandura, A. 1977. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review 84(2). 191. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bandura, A. 1997. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar

  • Bandura, A. 2010. Self-efficacy the corsini encyclopedia of psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar

  • Batha, K. & M. Carroll. 2007. Metacognitive training aids decision making. Australian Journal of Psychology 59(2). 64–69.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beaudoin, M. 2011. Are memory self-efficacy and memory performance related? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 137(2). 211–241. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bellingham, L. 2005. Is there language acquisition after 40? Older learners speak up. In P. Benson & D. Nunan (eds.), Learners’ stories: Difference and diversity in language learning, 56–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Benson, P. 2013. Teaching and researching: Autonomy in language learning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Bialystok, E., F. I. Craik & M. Freedman. 2007. Bilingualism as a protection against the onset of symptoms of dementia. Neuropsychologia 45(2). 459–464.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Birdsong, D. 2009. Age and the end state of second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition, 401–424. London: Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Birdsong, D. 2014. Dominance and Age in Bilingualism. Applied Linguistics. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bongaerts, T. 1999. Ultimate attainment in L2 pronunciation: The case of very advanced late L2 learners. In D. Birdsong (ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis, 133–159. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

  • Chiswick, B. R. & P. W. Miller. 2001. A model of destination-language acquisition: Application to male immigrants in Canada. Demography 38(3). 391–409.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Craik, F. I., E. Bialystok & M. Freedman. 2010. Delaying the onset of Alzheimer disease Bilingualism as a form of cognitive reserve. Neurology 75(19). 1726–1729CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Bot, K. & R. W. Schrauf. 2009. Language development over the lifespan. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

  • DeKeyser, R. 2012. Interactions between individual differences, treatments, and structures in SLA. Language Learning 62. 189–200. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • DeKeyser, R. M. 2000. The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22(04). 499–533.Google Scholar

  • Derwing, T. M., M. J. Munro & R. I. Thomson. 2008. A longitudinal study of ESL learners’ fluency and comprehensibility development. Applied Linguistics 29(3). 359–380.Google Scholar

  • Derwing, T. M. & M. J. Rossiter. 2003. The effects of pronunciation instruction on the accuracy, fluency, and complexity of L2 accented speech. Applied Language Learning 13(1). 1–17Google Scholar

  • Elmeroth, E. 2003. From refugee camp to solitary confinement: Illiterate adults learn Swedish as a second language. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 47(4). 431.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Flege, J. E. 2009. Give input a chance. In Piske & Young-Scholten (eds.), Input matters in SLA, 175–190. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

  • Flege, J. E. & S. Liu. 2001. The effect of experience on adults’ acquisition of a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23(4). 527–552.Google Scholar

  • Flege, J. E., I. R. MacKay & T. Piske. 2002. Assessing bilingual dominance. Applied Psycholinguistics 23(04). 567–598.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Flege, J. E., G. H. Yeni-Komshian & S. Liu. 1999. Age constraints on second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language 41(1). 78–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Foulkes, C. 2012. Australia’s boat people: Asylum challenges and two decades of policy experimentation, Migration Policy Institute, available http://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/australias-boat-people-asylum-challenges-and-two-decades-policy-experimentation

  • Geronimo, J., S. Folinsbee & J. Goveas. 2001. A research project into the settlement needs of adult immigrants with limited literacy skills in their first language who have settled in the Greater Toronto Area. Submitted to the Canadian Multilingual Literacy Centre. Retrieved on April March 22, 2007.Google Scholar

  • Granena, G. & M. H. Long. 2013. Age of onset, length of residence, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment in three linguistic domains. Second Language Research 29(3). 311–343.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Herd, P. 2010. Education and health in late-life among high school graduates: Cognitive versus psychological aspects of human capital. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 51(4). 478–496.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ioup, G., E. Boustagui, M. El Tigi & M. Moselle. 1994. Reexamining the critical period hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16(01). 73–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jia, G., D. Aaronson & Y. Wu. 2002. Long-term language attainment of bilingual immigrants: Predictive variables and language group differences. Applied Psycholinguistics 23(04). 599–621.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jia, G. & D. Aaronson. 2003. A longitudinal study of Chinese children and adolescents learning English in the United States. Applied Psycholinguistics 24(01). 131–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kavé, G., N. Eyal, A. Shorek & J. Cohen-Mansfield. 2008. Multilingualism and cognitive state in the oldest old. Psychology and Aging 23(1). 70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Khoo, S. E., G. Hugo & P. McDonald. 2008. Which skilled temporary migrants become permanent residents and why? 1. International Migration Review 42(1). 193–226.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kinginger, C. 2008. Language learning in study abroad: Case studies of Americans in France. The Modern Language Journal 92(s1). 1–124.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kinginger, C. 2009. Language learning and study abroad. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Kinsella, C. & D. Singleton. 2014. Much more than age. Applied Linguistics 35(4). 441–462. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Krueger, N. & P. R. Dickson. 1994. How believing in ourselves increases risk taking: Perceived self‐efficacy and opportunity recognition. Decision Sciences 25(3). 385–400.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lamendella, J. T. 1977. General principles of neurofunctional organization and their manifestation in primary and nonprimary language acquisition1. Language Learning 27(1). 155–196.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lan, W. 2005. Self‐monitoring and its relationship with educational level and task importance. Educational Psychology 25(1). 109–127. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lenet, A., C. Sanz, B. Lado, J. Howard Jr & D. Howard. 2011. Aging, pedagogical conditions, and differential success in SLA: An empirical study. In C. Sanz and R. Leow (eds.), Implicit and explicit language learning: Conditions, processes, and knowledge in SLA and bilingualism, 73–84. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

  • Lenneberg, E. 1967. Biological foundation of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

  • Long, M. (2005). Problems with supposed counter-evidence to the critical period hypothesis. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 43(4). 287–317.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacIntyre, P. D. & C. Charos. 1996. Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 15(1). 3–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Magogwe, J. M. & R. Oliver. 2007. The relationship between language learning strategies, proficiency, age and self-efficacy beliefs: A study of language learners in Botswana. System 35(3). 338–352.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marinova-Todd, S., D. B. Marshall & C. E. Snow. 2000. Three misconceptions about age and L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly 34(1). 9–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Maurer, J. 2011. Education and male-female differences in later-life cognition: International evidence from Latin America and the Caribbean. Demography 48(3). 915–930.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McDonald, J. L. 2000. Grammaticality judgments in a second language: Influences of age of acquisition and native language. Applied Psycholinguistics 21(03). 395–423.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mills, N., F. Pajares & C. Herron. 2007. Self‐efficacy of college intermediate French students: Relation to achievement and motivation. Language Learning 57(3). 417–442.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moyer, A. 2004. Age, accent, and experience in second language acquisition: An integrated approach to critical period inquiry. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

  • Moyer, A. 2007. Empirical considerations on the age factor in L2 phonology. Issues in Applied Linguistics 15(2). 109–127.Google Scholar

  • Moyer, A. 2014. Exceptional outcomes in L2 phonology: The critical factors of learner engagement and self-regulation. Applied Linguistics 35(4). 418–440. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Muñoz, C. 2012. Intensive exposure experiences in second language learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

  • Muñoz, C. & D. Singleton. 2011. A critical review of age-related research on L2 ultimate attainment. Language Teaching 44(01). 1–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nakatani, Y. 2005. The effects of awareness‐raising training on oral communication strategy use. The Modern Language Journal 89(1). 76–91.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Oxford, R. L. 2003. Language learning styles and strategies: Concepts and relationships. IRAL 41(4). 271–278.Google Scholar

  • Oxford, R. L. 2013. Teaching & researching: Language learning strategies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Park, J. S.-Y. 2011. The promise of English: Linguistic capital and the neoliberal worker in the South Korean job market. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 14(4). 443–455.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Peirce, B. N. 1995. Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly 29(1). 9–31. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Penfield, W. & L. Roberts. 1959. Speech and brain mechanisms. Princeton: NJL Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Ramage, K. 1990. Motivational factors and persistence in Foreign language study*. Language Learning 40(2). 189–219.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rebok, G. W. & L. J. Balcerak. 1989. Memory self-efficacy and performance differences in young and old adults: The effect of mnemonic training. Developmental Psychology 25(5). 714.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roberts, C. 2010. Language socialization in the workplace. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 30. 211–227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ross, D. 2013. The effects of age and memory on the ability to adjust to novel (artificial) dialect forms for L1 Spanish speakers. Retrieved from https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/42580/AgeMemoryEffects.pdf?sequence=2

  • Salthouse, T. A. 2009. When does age-related cognitive decline begin? Neurobiology of Aging 30(4). 507–514.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schmidt, R. 1983. Interaction, acculturation, and the acquisition of communicative competence: A case study of an adult. In N. Wolfson & E. Judd (eds.), Sociolinguistics and language acquisition, 137–174. Berkeley: Newbury House.Google Scholar

  • Schmidt, R. 2012. Attention, awareness, and individual differences in language learning. In W. M. Chan, K. N. Chin, S. Bhatt & I. Walker (eds.), Perspectives on individual characteristics and foreign language education, 6–27. Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Schneider, W. 2008. The development of metacognitive knowledge in children and adolescents: Major trends and implications for education. Mind, Brain, and Education 2(3). 114–121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ter-Minasova, S. G. 2005. Traditions and innovations: English language teaching in Russia. World Englishes 24(4). 445–454. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Torres, S. 2006. Elderly immigrants in Sweden: ‘Otherness’ under construction. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 32(8). 1341–1358. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Veenman, M. V. J. 2005. Relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills: Age and task differences. Learning and Individual Differences 15(2). 159–176. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yates, L. 2010. Language training and settlement success: Are they related? Sydney: AMEP Research Centre, Macquarie University. Retrieved from http://www.ameprc.mq.edu.au/docs/LanguageTrainingSettlement_.pdf.

  • Yates, L. 2011. Interaction, language learning and social inclusion in early settlement. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 14(4). 457–471.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yates, L., A. Terraschke, B. Zielinski, E. Pryor, J. Wang, G. Major, M. Radhakrishnan, H. Middleton, M. Chisari & V. Williams Tetteh. 2015. Final report: AMEP Longitudinal Study 2011–2014, Sydney: Linguistics Department Macquarie University.Google Scholar

  • Yates, L., & E. Pryor. 2013. Fact Sheet 3: Building confidence outside the classroom – preparing learners. Series: Building confidence in the classroom and beyond. Professional development resource. Retrieved from http://www.neas.org.au/wp-content/uploads/Building-Confidence-Fact-Sheet-3.pdf.

  • Yates, L., M. Chisari & E. Pryor. 2013. Fact Sheet 4: Building confidence in the community. Series: Building confidence in the classroom and beyond. Professional development resource. Retrieved from http://www.neas.org.au/wp-content/uploads/Building-Confidence-Fact-Sheet-4.pdf

  • Zahodne, L. B., M. M. Glymour, C. Sparks, D. Bontempo, R. A. Dixon, S. W. MacDonald & J. J. Manly. 2011. Education does not slow cognitive decline with aging: 12-year evidence from the Victoria Longitudinal Study. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 17(06). 1039–1046.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2019-05-23

Published in Print: 2019-05-26


Citation Information: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages 181–204, ISSN (Online) 1613-4141, ISSN (Print) 0019-042X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2015-0113.

Export Citation

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in