Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching

Ed. by Jordens, Peter / Roberts, Leah

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.242

CiteScore 2017: 1.47

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.892
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.915

Online
ISSN
1613-4141
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 56, Issue 3

Issues

Syntactically–driven algorithmic processing of PP-attachment ambiguity in a second language

Junya Fukuta / Aki Goto
  • Graduate School of Languages and Cultures, Nagoya University, Furo, Chikusa, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Yusaku Kawaguchi
  • Division of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Aichi Gakuin University, Nisshin, Aichi 470-0195, Japan
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Akari Kurita / Daisuke Murota
Published Online: 2017-05-23 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2017-0038

Abstract

This study explored whether Japanese EFL learners can utilize syntactically–driven algorithmic processing. For this purpose, the study attempted to inhibit other forms of processing (i. e., semantically–driven heuristic processing and processing with explicit knowledge) by using a self–paced reading task with priming of PP–attachment ambiguity. In the experiment, 20 highly proficient Japanese learners and 18 native speakers of English engaged in a phrase–by–phrase self–paced reading task after reading prime sentences. Although the results of non–native speakers (NNSs) showed a similar tendency to the NSs, there were slight differences between NSs and NNSs in terms of the size of the priming effects. This indicated that highly proficient Japanese EFL learners can utilize syntactically–driven algorithmic processing, but the process may be relatively “fragile” compared to that of NSs.

Keywords: PP–attachment ambiguity; syntactic priming; good–enough processing; algorithmic processing; implicit knowledge

References

  • Bernolet, Sarah, Robert Hartsuiker & Martin Pickering. 2007. Shared syntactic representations in bilinguals: Evidence for the role of word–order representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 33. 931–949. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bock, Kathryn. 1986. Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology 18. 355–387. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bock, Kathryn. 1995. Sentence production: From mind to mouth. In Joanne L. Miller & Peter D. Eimas (eds.), Speech, Language, and Communication, 181–216. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • Christianson, Kiel, Steven G. Luke, & Fernanda Ferreira. 2010. Effects of plausibility on structural priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology 36. 538–544.Google Scholar

  • Clahsen, Harald & Claudia Felser. 2006. Grammatical processing of language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics 27. 3–42. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dussias, Paola. 2001. Sentence parsing in fluent Spanish–English bilinguals. In J. Nicol (ed.), One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing, 159–176. Cambridge, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Ellis, Rod. 2005. Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge in second language acquisition: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27. 141–171. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Felser, Claudia, Leah Roberts, Theodore Marinis & Rebecca Gross. 2003. The processing of ambiguous sentences by first and second language learners of English. Applied Psycholinguistics 24. 453–489. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ferreira, Fernanda. 2003. The misinterpretation of non–canonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology 47. 164–203. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Foote, Rebecca. 2010. Age of acquisition and proficiency as factors in language production: Agreement in bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 13. 99–118.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fukuta, Junya, Aki Goto, Yusaku Kawaguchi, Daisuke Murota & Akari Kurita. 2015. Japanese EFL learners’ implicit knowledge and algorithmic processing of dative alternation: Perspective from syntactic priming in reading comprehension. ARELE: Annual review of English language education in Japan 26. 221–236.Google Scholar

  • Jackson, Carrie & Susan Bob. 2009. The processing and comprehension of wh–questions among second language speakers of German. Applied Psycholinguistics 30. 603–636. doi:.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Jackson, Carrie N, & Paola E. Dussias. 2009. Cross-linguistic differences and their impact on L2 sentence processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12. 65–82.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Jiang, Nan. 2007. Selective integration of linguistic knowledge in adult second language learning. Language Learning 57. 1–33. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jiang, Nan, Eugenia Novokshanova, Kyoko Matsuda & Xin Wang. 2011. Morphological congruency and the acquisition of L2 morphemes. Language Learning 61. 940–967. doi:.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Kim, Christina, Kathleen Carbary & Michael Tanenhaus. 2014. Syntactic priming without lexical overlap in reading comprehension. Language and Speech 57. 181–195. doi: .CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Kusanagi, Kunihiro. 2013. Daini gengo nouryoku no kouseiginou to shiteno meijiteki/anjiteki chishiki [Implicit/explicit knowledge as component skills of second language performance]. Paper presented at the second 2013 conference of Japan Association for Language Education and Technology, Kansai Chapter, Methodology Special Interest Groups (SIG).Google Scholar

  • Kusanagi, Kunihiro & Junko Yamashita. 2013. Influences of linguistic factors on the acquisition of explicit and implicit knowledge: Focusing on agreement type and morphosyntactic regularity in English plural morphemes. ARELE: Annual review of English language education in Japan 24. 205–220. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110009806701

  • Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 1975. The acquisition of grammatical morphemes by adult ESL students. TESOL Quarterly 9. 409–419. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3585625Crossref

  • Leeser, Michael J., Anel Brandl, & Christine Weissglass. 2011. The role of task and structure in L2 sentence processing. In K. McDonough & P. Trofimovich (Eds.) Insights from psycholinguistics: Applying priming research to L2 learning and teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Lim, Jung & Kiel Christianson. 2013a. Integrating meaning and structure in L1–L2 and L2–L1 translations. Second Language Research 29. 233–256. doi:.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Lim, Jung & Kiel Christianson. 2013b. Second language sentence processing in reading for comprehension and translation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 16. 518–537. doi:.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Lim, Jung & Kiel Christianson. 2014. Second language sensitivity to agreement errors: Evidence from eye movements during comprehension and translation. Applied Psycholinguistics. Advanced online publication. doi:.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • MacDonald, Maryellen, Neal Pearlmutter & Mark Seidenberg. 1994. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review 101. 676–703.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meijer, Paul & Jean Fox Tree. 2003. Building syntactic structures in speaking: A bilingual exploration. Experimental Psychology 50. 185–195. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Miyamoto, Edson, Edward Gibson, Neal Pearlmutter, Takako Aikawa & Shigeru Miyagawa. 1999. A U–Shaped relative clause attachment preference in Japanese. Language and Cognitive Processes 14. 663–686. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Morishita, Miwa. 2011. How the difference in modality affects language production: A syntactic priming experiment using spoken and written sentence completion tasks. JACET Journal 53. 75–91. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110008897626

  • Morishita, Miwa. 2013. The effects of interaction on syntactic priming: A psycholinguistic study using scripted interaction tasks. ARELE: Annual review of English language education in Japan 24. 141–156. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110009806697

  • Morishita, Miwa, Hisaki Satoi & Hirokazu Yokokawa. 2010. Verbal lexical representation of Japanese EFL learners: Syntactic priming during language production. Journal of the Japan Society of Speech Sciences 11. 29–43.Google Scholar

  • Nakagawa, Eri, Miwa Morishita & Hirokazu Yokokawa. 2013. The effects of lexical processing and proficiency on syntactic priming during sentence production by Japanese learners of English. ARELE: Annual review of English language education in Japan 24. 189–204. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110009806700

  • Papadopoulou, Despina & Harald Clahsen. 2003. Parsing strategies in L1 and L2 sentence processing: A study of relative clause attachment in Greek. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25. 501–528. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pickering, Martin & Holly Branigan. 1998. The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language 39. 633–651. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pickering, Martin & Victor Ferreira. 2008. Structural priming: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin 134. 427–459. doi:CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Sabourin, Laura & Laurie Stowe. 2008. Second language processing: When are first and second languages processed similarly? Second Language Research 24. 397–430. doi:.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Sato, Mikako & Claudia Felser. 2010. Sensitivity to morphosyntactic violations in English as a second language. Second Language 9. 101–118.Google Scholar

  • Schmidt, Maxine. 1980. Coordinate structures and language universals in interlanguage. Language Learning 30. 397–416. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schoonbaert, Sofie, Robert Hartsuiker & Martin Pickering. 2007. The representation of lexical and syntactic information in bilinguals: Evidence from syntactic priming. Journal of Memory and Language 56. 153–171.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Tamura, Yu, Junya Fukuta, Yoshito Nishimura & Daiki Kato. 2015. Coordinated NPs agree with singular or plural in there–constructions? A comparison between NS and NNS in a self–paced reading task. JSLS 2015 Conference Handbook. 152–153.Google Scholar

  • Tanaka, Koichi & Rod Ellis. 2003. Study–abroad, language proficiency, and learner beliefs about language learning. JALT Journal 25. 63–85. http://jalt–publications.org/files/pdf–article/jj–25.1–art3.pdf

  • Tanenhaus, Michael & John Trueswell. 1995. Sentence comprehension. In J. L. Miller & P. D. Eimas (eds.), Speech, language, and communication, 217–262. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • Tooley, Kristen & Matthew Traxler. 2010. Syntactic priming effects in comprehension: A critical review. Language and Linguistics Compass 4. 925–937. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tooley, Kristen M. & Kathryn Bock. 2014. On the party of structural persistence in language production and comprehension. Cognition 132. 101–136. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Traxler, Matthew & Kristen Toolay. 2008. Priming in sentence comprehension: Strategic or syntactic? Language and Cognitive Processes 23. 609–645. doi:CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Trenkic, Danijela, Jelena Mirkovic, & Gerry T. M. Altmann. 2014. Real-time grammar processing by native and non-native speakers: Constructions unique to the second language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17. 237–257. doi:.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Vainio, Seppo, Anneli Pajunen, & Jukka Hyönä, J. 2015. Processing modifier-head agreement in L1 and L2 Finnish: An eye-tracking study. Second Language Research. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Trenkic, Danijela, Jelena Mirkovic, & Gerry T. M. Altmann. 2014. Real-time grammar processing by native and non-native speakers: Constructions unique to the second language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17. 237–257. doi:CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Witzel, Jeferey, Naoko Witzel & Janet Nicol. 2012. Deeper than shallow: Evidence for structure–based parsing biases in second–language sentence processing. Applied Psycholinguistics 33.419–456. doi:.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-05-23

Published in Print: 2018-09-25


Citation Information: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, Volume 56, Issue 3, Pages 253–277, ISSN (Online) 1613-4141, ISSN (Print) 0019-042X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2017-0038.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in