Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching

Ed. by Jordens, Peter / Roberts, Leah

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.242

CiteScore 2017: 1.47

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.892
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.915

Online
ISSN
1613-4141
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Ahead of print

Issues

A critical examination of perceptual learning styles in English language teaching

Carol Lethaby / Russell Mayne
Published Online: 2018-07-28 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2017-0067

Abstract

This article critically reviews the concept of learning styles, particularly the notion of perceptual, that is, visual, auditory and kinaesthetic (VAK), styles. We look at problems with the definition and terminology used to describe VAK learning styles, arguing that they have yet to be shown to be consistent and measurable attributes. We review the history of VAK, present literature on the topic in language teaching and other educational fields and scrutinize the scientific, psychological and educational concerns with the use of VAK learning styles in the classroom, asserting that much of the popularity assigned to the notion of VAK learning styles is based on the false assumption that teaching to a learner’s sensory learning preference will enhance achievement. We conclude with some brief suggestions for alternative pedagogical interventions in language teaching which do have strong empirical backing as well as a call to the language teaching profession to look to other fields, such as neuroscience and cognitive science to guard against classroom practices that have no scientific basis.

Keywords: learning styles; neuromyths; VAK learning styles; perceptual learning styles

References

  • Akbarzadeha, M & H Fatemipour. 2014. Examining the match or mismatch between teaching style preferences and upper intermediate EFL learners’ learning style preferences. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 98. 137–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Al-Othman, NMA. 2004. The relationship between gender and learning styles in internet-based teaching-a study from Kuwait. Reading 4/1. 38–54. (accessed). http://readingmatrix.com/

  • Arbuthnott, KD & GP Krätzig. 2015. Effective teaching: Sensory learning styles versus general memory processes. Comprehensive Psychology 4. 2.Google Scholar

  • Aziz, K. 2005. Assessment of language learning strategies used by Palestinian EFL learners. Foreign language annals 38/1. 108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Barbe, WB. 1967. Perceptually handicapped. In EC Frierson & WB Barbe (eds.), Educating children with learning disabilities, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar

  • Barbe, WB, RH Swassing & MN Milone. 1979. Teaching through modality strengths: Concepts and practices. Columbus, Ohio: Zaner-Bloser.Google Scholar

  • Barcroft, J & M Sommers. 2014. A theoretical account of the effects of acoustic variability on word learning and speech processing. In V Torrens & L. Escobar (eds.), The processing of lexicon and morphosyntax, Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Boyle, RA & R Dunn. 1998. Teaching law students through individual learning styles. Alb. L. Rev 62. 213. http://heinonline.org/ (accessed)

  • Brown, HD. 2007. Principles of language learning and teaching (Fifth edition). White Plains: Pearson Education.Google Scholar

  • Brown, S & J Larson-Hall. 2012. Second language acquisition myths: Applying second language research to classroom teaching. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

  • Butcher, KR. 2006. Learning from text with diagrams: Promoting mental model development and inference generation. Journal of Educational Psychology 98. 182–197. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chavosh, M & M Davoudi. 2016. The relationship between perceptual learning styles and reading comprehension performance of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of English Linguistics 6/3. 61–69.Google Scholar

  • Clark, RC. 2014. Evidence-based Training Methods. 2nd edn. Alexandria: ATD.Google Scholar

  • Coffield, F. 2012. Learning styles: Unreliable invalid and impractical and yet still widely used. In P Adey & J Dillon (eds.), Bad Education, Berkshire: Open University Press. 215–230.Google Scholar

  • Coffield, F, D Moseley, E Hall & K Ecclestone. 2004. Learning Styles and Pedagogy in Post-16 Learning. A Systematic and Critical Review. London: Learning and Skills Research Centre.Google Scholar

  • Dekker, S, NC Lee, P Howard-Jones & J Jolles. 2012. Neuromyths in education: Prevalence and predictors of misconceptions among teachers. Frontiers in Psychology 3/429. 1–8. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dörnyei, Z. 2005. The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

  • Dörnyei, Z & S Ryan. 2015. The psychology of the language learner revisited. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Dudley-Evans, T & MJ St John. 1998. Developments in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Dunlosky, J, KA Rawson, EJ Marsh, MJ Nathan & DT Willingham. 2013. Improving students learning with effective learning techniques promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 14/1. 4–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dunn, K & R Dunn. 1987. Dispelling outmoded beliefs about student learning. Educational Leadership 44/6. 55–63. http://www.ascd.com/ (accessed)

  • Dunn, R. 1996. How To Implement and Supervise a Learning Style Program. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development: Alexandria.Google Scholar

  • Dunn, R & K Dunn. 1972. Practical approaches to individualizing instruction: Contracts and other effective teaching strategies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Parker Publishing Company.Google Scholar

  • Dunn, R & K Dunn. 1975. Educators self-teaching guide to individualizing instructional programs. West Nyack, NY: Parker Publishing Company.Google Scholar

  • Dunn, R & K Dunn. 1978. Teaching students through their individual learning styles: A practical approach. Reston, VA: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

  • Dunn, R, K Dunn & GE Price. 1977. Diagnosing learning styles: A prescription for avoiding malpractice suits. Phi Delta Kappan, 418–420. http://www.jstor.org/ (accessed)

  • Dunn, R & S Griggs. 1988. Learning Styles: Quiet Revolution in American Schools. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.Google Scholar

  • Dunn, R & S Griggs. 1990. Research on the learning style characteristics of selected racial and ethnic groups. Journal of Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities International 6/3. 261–280. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dunn, RS & SA Griggs. 1995. Multiculturalism and learning style: Teaching and counselling adolescents. Westcourt, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar

  • Ehrman, M & R Oxford. 1990. Adult language learning styles and strategies in an intensive training setting. Modern Language Journal 74. 311–326. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ehrman, ME, BL Leaver & RL Oxford. 2003. A brief overview of individual differences in second language learning. System 31/3. 313–330. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eliason, PA. 1995. Difficulties with cross-cultural learning-styles assessment. In J Reid (Ed) Learning styles in the ESL/EFL Classroom. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar

  • Ellis, R. 2008. The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Ellis, R & N Shintani. 2014. Exploring language pedagogy through second language acquisition research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Folse, KS. 2004. Vocabulary myths: Applying second language research to classroom teaching. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

  • Frostig, M. 1967. Education of Children with learning difficulties. In EC Frierson & WB Barbe (eds.), Educating children with learning disabilities. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar

  • Gardner, H. 2000. Intelligence Reframed. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

  • Garrett, SL. 1992. The effects of perceptual preference and motivation on vocabulary and attitude scores among selected high school students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of La Verne, La Verne, CA.Google Scholar

  • Griggs, S & R Dunn. 1995. Hispanic-American Students and Learning Styles. Emergency librarian 23/2. 11–16. http://files.eric.ed.gov/ (accessed)

  • Harmer, J. 2015. The practice of English language teaching Fifth edition. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar

  • Hatami, S. 2013. Learning styles. ELT Journal 67/4. 1–3. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hattie, J. 2009. Visible learning. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Hattie, J & GC Yates. 2013. Visible learning and the science of how we learn. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Honigsfeld, A & R Dunn. 2003. High school male and female learning-style similarities and differences in diverse nations. The Journal of Educational Research 96/4. 195–206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Howard-Jones, P. 2014. Neuroscience and education: Myths and messages. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 15. 817–824. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hyland, K. 1993. Culture and Learning: A study of the learning styles preferences of Japanese students. RELC Journal 24/2. 69–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hyland, K. 1994. The learning styles of Japanese students. JALT Journal 16/1. 55–74.Google Scholar

  • Jarrett, C. 2015. Great Myths of the Brain. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Kinsella, K. 1995. Understanding and empowering diverse learners. In J Reid (Ed) Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar

  • Kirschner, PA. 2017. Stop propagating the learning styles myth. Computers and Education 106. 166–171. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kirschner, PA & JJG Van Merriënboer. 2013. Do learners really know best? Urban legends in education. Educational psychologist 48(3) 169–183. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Krätzig, GP & KD Arbuthnott. 2006. Perceptual learning style and learning proficiency: A test of the hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology 98. 238–246. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lethaby, C & P Harries. 2016. Learning styles and teacher education: Are we perpetuating neuromyths? ELT Journal 70/1. 16–27.Google Scholar

  • Lilienfeld, SO, SJ Lynn, J Ruscio & BL Beyerstein. 2010. Fifty great myths of popular psychology: Shattering widespread misconceptions about human behavior. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Massa, LJ & RE Mayer. 2006. Testing the ATI hypothesis: Should multimedia instruction accommodate verbalizer-visualizer cognitive style?. Learning and Individual Differences 16. 321–336. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mayer, RE, J Heiser & S Lonn. 2001. Cognitive Constraints on Multimedia Learning: When Presenting More Material Results in Less Understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology 93(1) 187–198. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nel, C. 2008. Learning styles. In C Griffiths (ed.), The good language learner: A tribute to Joan Rubin, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Newton, PM. 2015. The learning styles myth is thriving in higher education. Frontiers in Psychology Dec Vol 6/Article. 1908. 1–5. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Norman, S. 2003. Transforming learning. Safire Press: London.Google Scholar

  • Oxford, R & R Lavine. 1991. Teacher-student style wars in the language classroom: Research insights and suggestions. AFDL Bulletin. [Online] Available: http://www.ade.org/adfl/bulletin/V23N2/232038.htm (January 7, 2010)

  • Oxford, RL. 2003. Language learning styles and strategies: An overview . GALA, 1–25 http://web.ntpu.edu.tw/~language/workshop/read2.pdf

  • Pashler, H, M McDaniel, D Rohrer & R Bjork. 2008. Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 9/3. 105–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Peacock, M. 2001. Match or mismatch? Learning styles and teaching styles in EFL. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 11/1. 1–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Purpura, JE. 2014. Language learning strategies and styles. In M Celce-Murcia, DM Brinton & MA Snow (eds.), Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, 4th edn. Boston: Heinle Cengage Learning.Google Scholar

  • Putintseva, T. 2006. The importance of learning styles in ESL/EFL. The Internet TESL Journal 12/3. www.iteslj.org (accessed).

  • Reid, J. 1984. Perceptual learning style preference questionnaire. Copyrighted by Reid. Available through Joy Reid, Department of English, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82070.Google Scholar

  • Reid, JM. 1987. The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly 21/1. 87–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reid, JM. 1995. Learning Styles in the ESL/EFL Classroom. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar

  • Reid, JM. (ed.), 1998. Understanding learning styles in the second language classroom. Prentice Hall Regents.Google Scholar

  • Richards, JC & TS Rodgers. 2014. Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Riener, C & D Willingham. 2010. The myth of learning styles. Change Sept/ Oct. 32–36. (accessed). www.changemag.org

  • Roediger, HL & MA Pyc. 2012. Inexpensive techniques to improve education. Applying cognitive psychology to enhance educational practice Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 1/4. 242–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rogowsky, BA, BM Calhoun & P Tallal. 2015. Matching learning style to instructional method: Effects on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology 10/1(64). CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rosenberg, M. 2013. Spotlight on Learning Styles. Peaslake: Delta Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Schellekens, P. 2007. The Oxford ESOL Handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Scrivener, J. 2012. Classroom management techniques. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Stebbins, C. 1995. Culture-specific perceptual learning style preferences of postsecondary students of English as a second language. In J Reid (ed.), Learning Styles in the ESL/EFL Classroom, Boston: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar

  • Stobart, G. 2008. Testing times: The uses and abuses of assessment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Thornbury, S. 2006. An A to Z of ELT. Oxford: Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Tight, DG. 2010. Perceptual learning style matching and L2 vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning 60. 792–833. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tomlinson, B. 2011. Materials development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Van Kesteren, MTR, M Rijpkema, DJ Ruiter, RGM Morris & G Fernandez. 2014. Building on prior knowledge: Schema-dependent encoding processes relate to academic performance. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 26/10. 2250–2261. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Willingham, DT. 2005. Do visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learners need visual, auditory, and kinesthetic instruction? American Educator 29/2. 31–35. (accessed). www.readingrockets.org

  • Willingham, DT. 2009. Why don’t students like school?. American Educator, Spring, 4–13.Google Scholar

  • Wintergerst, AC, A DeCapua & RC Itzen. 2001. The construct validity of one learning styles instrument. System 29. 385–403.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wong, LLC & D Nunan. 2011. The learning styles and strategies of effective language learners. System 39. 144–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wu, SH & S Alrabah. 2009. A cross‐cultural study of Taiwanese and Kuwaiti EFL students learning styles and multiple intelligences. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 46/4. 393–403. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-07-28


Citation Information: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, ISSN (Online) 1613-4141, ISSN (Print) 0019-042X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2017-0067.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in