Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching

Ed. by Jordens, Peter / Roberts, Leah

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.667
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.296

CiteScore 2018: 1.02

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.891
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.341

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 55, Issue 4


Developing interlanguage: Driving forces in children learning Dutch and German

Peter Jordens / Dagmar Bittner
Published Online: 2017-10-28 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2017-0147


Spontaneous language learning both in children learning their mother tongue and in adults learning a second language shows that language development proceeds in a stage-wise manner. Given that a developmental stage is defined as a coherent linguistic system, utterances of language learners can be accounted for in terms of what (Selinker, Larry. 1972. Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics 10. 209–231) referred to with the term Interlanguage. This paper is a study on the early interlanguage systems of children learning Dutch and German as their mother tongue. The present child learner systems, so it is claimed, are coherent lexical systems based on types of verb-argument structure that are either agentive (as in Dutch: kannie bal pakke ‘cannot ball get’, or German: mag nich nase putzen ‘like not nose clean’) or non-agentive (as in Dutch: popje valt bijna ‘doll falls nearly’, or in German: ente fällt ‘duck falls’). At this lexical stage, functional morphology (e. g. morphological finiteness, tense), function words (e. g. auxiliary verbs, determiners) and word order variation are absent. For these typically developing children, both in Dutch and in German, it is claimed that developmental progress is driven by the acquisition of the formal properties of topicalization. It is, furthermore, argued that this feature seems to serve as the driving force in the instantiation of the functional, i. e. informational linguistic properties of the target-language system.

Keywords: interlanguage; child language acquisition; Dutch; German; learner varieties


  • Bittner, Dagmar. 2003. The emergence of verb inflection in two German speaking children. In Dagmar Bittner, Wolfgang U. Dressler & Marianne Kilani-Schoch (eds.), Development of verb inflection in first language acquisition, 53–88. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Clahsen, Harald. 1986. Verb inflections in German child language: Acquisition of agreement markings and the functions they encode. Linguistics 24. 79–121.Google Scholar

  • Clark, Eve V. 2003. First language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Corder, S. Pit. 1978. ‘Simple codes’ and the source of the second language learner’s initial heuristic hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 1. 1–10.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Haan, Ger. 1987. A theory-bound approach to the acquisition of verb placement in Dutch. In Ger De Haan & Wim Zonneveld (eds.), Formal parameters of generative grammar. Yearbook 1987, 15–30. Dordrecht: ICG.Google Scholar

  • Gillis, Steven. 2003. A case study of the early acquisition of verbs in Dutch. In Dagmar Bittner, Wolfgang U. Dressler & Marianne Kilani-Schoch (eds.), Development of verb inflection in first language acquisition, 171–203. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Hoekstra, Teun & Peter Jordens. 1994. From adjunct to head. In Teun Hoekstra & Bonnie D. Schwartz (eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar, 119–149. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Ingram, David & William Thompson. 1996. Early syntactic acquisition in German: Evidence for the Modal Hypothesis. Language 72. 97–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jolink, Anke. 2009. Finiteness in children with SLI. A functional approach. In Christine Dimroth & Peter Jordens (eds.), Functional categories in learner language, 235–259. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Jordens, Peter. 1990. The acquisition of verb placement in Dutch and German. Linguistics 28. 1407–1448.Google Scholar

  • Jordens, Peter. 2012. Language acquisition and the functional category system. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

  • Klein, Wolfgang. 1997. Learner varieties are the normal case. The Clarion. Magazine of the European Second Language Association 3. 4–6.Google Scholar

  • Klein, Wolfgang. 1998. Assertion and finiteness. In Norbert Dittmar & Zvi Penner (eds.), Issues in the theory of language acquisition, 225–245. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

  • Klein, Wolfgang. 2008. The topic situation. In Bernt Ahrenholz, Ursula Bredel, Wolfgang Klein, Martina Rost-Roth & Romuald Skiba (eds.), Empirische Forschung und Theoriebildung. Beiträge aus Soziolinguistik, Gesprochene Sprache- und Zweitspracherwerbsforschung. Festschrift für Norbert Dittmar zum 65. Geburtstag, 287–305. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar

  • Klein, Wolfgang & Clive Perdue. 1997. The basic variety (Or: Couldn’t languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research 13. 301–347.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Perdue, Clive. 2006. “Creating language anew”: Some remarks on an idea of Bernard Comrie’s. Linguistics 44. 853–871.Google Scholar

  • Poeppel, David & Kenneth Wexler. 1993. The Full Competence Hypothesis of clause structure in early German. Language 69. 1–33.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Selinker, Larry. 1972. Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics 10. 209–231.Google Scholar

  • Verrips, Maaike. 1996. Potatoes must peel. The acquisition of the Dutch passive. Ph.D. dissertation: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-10-28

Published in Print: 2017-11-27

Citation Information: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, Volume 55, Issue 4, Pages 365–392, ISSN (Online) 1613-4141, ISSN (Print) 0019-042X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2017-0147.

Export Citation

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in