Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

International Review of Social Research

2 Issues per year

Open Access
See all formats and pricing

Social mobility in China and Britain: a comparative study

Yaojun Li
  • Department of Sociology and the Cathie Marsh Institute for Social Research, Manchester University, UK
/ Shun Zhang
  • Department of Sociology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, China
/ Jianxun Kong
  • South Asian Research Institute, Yunnan Academy for Social Sciences, China
Published Online: 2015-06-30 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/irsr-2015-0003


This paper looks at social mobility in China and Britain. It explores whether the rapid economic development in China in the last thirty years has brought its mobility closer to that in Britain. It also examines the effects of China’s household registration system (hukou) on people’s mobility chances. Using national representative surveys in the two countries, we found a convergence in total mobility in the two countries but higher levels of inequality in China in terms of relative mobility. Chinese women faced the greatest disadvantages. The prime driver for social inequality in China was the hukou system. Rural people in China had very limited opportunities for education but even those who had similar levels of education were still very much hampered by the hukou penalty in trying to gain access to advantaged positions. Both societies are highly unequal but China has an additional barrier.

Keywords: Social mobility; class; gender; hukou; China; Britain


  • Analysis’. Sociology, 41(3): 533-549.

  • Atkinson, W. (2007b) ‘Beck, individualization and the death of class: a critique’. British Journal of Sociology, 58(3): 349-366. [Crossref]

  • Atkinson, W. (2008) ‘Not all that was solid has melted into air (or liquid): a critique of Bauman on individualisation and class in liquid modernity’. The Sociological Review (56)1: 1-17. [Crossref]

  • Bauman, Z. (1998) Globalisation: the human consequences, Oxford: Blackwells.

  • Beck, U. and E. Beck-Gernsheim (2002) Individualization: institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences, London: Sage.

  • Beller, E. (2009) ‘Bringing Intergenerational Social Mobility Research into the Twenty-first Century: Why Mothers Matter’, American Sociological Review, 74: 507-528. [Crossref]

  • Blanden, J., A. Goodman, P. Gregg, and S. Machin (2004) ‘Changes in Intergenerational Income Mobility in Britain’. In Corak, M. (ed.) Generational Income Mobility in North America and Europe, pp: 122-146. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Blau, P. and O. Duncan (1967) The American Occupational Structure. New York: John Wiley Press.

  • Blau, P. and D. Ruan (1990) ‘Inequality of Opportunity in Urban China and America’. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 9: 3-32.

  • Breen, R. (ed.) (2004) Social Mobility in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Breen, R., R. Luijkx, W. Müller and R. Pollak (2009) ‘Non-Persistent Inequality in Educational Attainment: Evidence from Eight European Countries’. American Journal of Sociology, 114(5): 1475-1521. [Crossref]

  • Bukodi, E. and J. H. Goldthorpe (2010) ‘Market versus Meritocracy: Hungary as a critical case’, European Sociological Review, 26(6): 655-674. [Crossref]

  • Chan, T.W. and Goldthorpe, J.H. (2005). The social stratification of theatre, dance and cinema attendance. Cultural Trends, 14(3): 193–212.

  • Chen, M. (2013) ‘Intergenerational mobility in contemporary China’. Chinese Sociological Review, 45(4): 29-53. [Crossref]

  • Cheng, Y. and J. Dai (1995) ‘Intergenerational Mobility in Modern China’. European Sociological Review, 11: 17-36.

  • Deng, Z. and D. Treiman (1997) ‘The Impact of the Cultural Revolution on Trends in Educational Attainment in the People’s Republic of China’. American Journal of Sociology, 103: 391-428. [Crossref]

  • Devine, F. and Y. Li (2013) ‘The changing relationship between origins, education and destinations in the 1990s and 2000s’. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 34(5-6): 766-791. [Crossref]

  • Erikson, R. (1984) ‘Social Class of Men, Women and Families’. Sociology, 18: 500-514. [Crossref]

  • Erikson, R. and J. H. Goldthorpe (1992) The Constant Flux: A Study of Social Mobility in Industrial Societies. Oxford: Clarendon.

  • Erikson, R., J. H. Goldthorpe and L. Portocarero (1979) ‘Intergenerational Class Mobility in Three Western European Societies’. British Journal of Sociology, 30(4): 415-441. [Crossref]

  • Featherman, D., F. Jones and R. Hauser (1975) ‘Assumptions of Social Mobility Research in the United States: The Case of Occupational Status’. Social Science Research, 4: 329-360. [Crossref]

  • Ganzeboom, H. and D. Treiman (1996) ‘Internationally Comparable Measures of Occupational Status for the 1988 International Standard Classification of Occupations’. Social Science Research, 25: 201-239. [Crossref]

  • Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

  • Giddens, A. (2007) ‘You need greater equality to achieve more social mobility’, The Guardian, 24th, May.

  • Goldthorpe, J. H. (with Llewellyn, C. and C. Payne) (1987) Social Mobility and Class Structure in Modern Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Goldthorpe, J. H. (2007) On Sociology. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.

  • Goldthorpe, J. H. (2013) ‘Understanding – and Misunderstanding – Social Mobility in Britain: The Entry of the Economists, the Confusion of Politicians and the Limits of Educational Policy’. Journal of Social Policy, 42: 431-450. [Crossref]

  • Goldthorpe, J. H. and M. Jackson (2007) ‘Intergenerational class mobility in contemporary Britain: political concerns and empirical findings’. British Journal of Sociology, 58(4): 526-546. [Crossref]

  • Goldthorpe, J.H. and C. Mills (2004) ‘Trends in Intergenerational Class Mobility in Britain in the Late Twentieth Century’, in Richard Breen (2004) (ed) Social Mobility in Europe, pp: 195-224. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Goldthorpe, J. H. and C. Mills (2008) ‘Trends in intergenerational class mobility in modern Britain: evidence from national surveys, 1972-2005’. National Institute Economic Review, 205: 83-100.

  • Gong, H. C., A. Leigh and X. Meng (2012) ‘Intergenerational Income Mobility in Urban China’. Review of Income and Wealth, 58(3): 481-503. [Crossref]

  • Grusky, D. B. and R. M. Hauser (1984) ‘Comparative social mobility revisited: models of convergence and divergence in 16 countries’. American Sociological Review 49: 19-38. [Crossref]

  • Heath, A. and Li, Y. (2014) Key Concepts in the Social Sciences: Social Mobility, forthcoming, Bristol: Polity.

  • Jonsson, J. and C. Mills (1993) ‘Social Mobility in the 1970s and 1980s: A Study of Men and Women in England and Sweden’. European Sociological Review, 9: 229-248.

  • Lambert, P., K. Prandy and W. Bottero (2007) ‘By Slow Degrees: Two Centuries of Social Reproduction and Mobility in Britain’. Sociological Research Online, 13:1.

  • Kerckhoff, A., R. Campbell and I. Winfield-Laird (1985) ‘Social Mobility in Great Britain and the United States’. American Journal of Sociology, 90(2): 281-308. [Crossref]

  • Li, Y. (2013) ‘Social Class and Social Capital in China and Britain: A Comparative Study’, Social Inclusion, 1(1): 59-71.

  • Li, Y. and F, Devine (2011) ‘Is Social Mobility really declining?’ Sociological Research Online, 12: 1-24.

  • Li, Y. and F. Devine (2014) ‘Social Mobility in Britain, 1991-2011’. In L. Archer, A. Mann and J. Stanley (eds) Understanding Employer Engagement in Education: theories and evidence, pp. 79-91. London: Routledge.

  • Li, Y. and A. Heath (2014) ‘Ethnic inequalities in social mobility’, presentation at the House of Lords, London, 10 June.

  • Liu, J. (2008) ‘Unequal chances in China’s basic education and changes’. China Social Sciences, 5: 101-116 (in Chinese).

  • Lieberson, S. (1975) ‘Rand-Sum Comparisons Between Group’. In D. Heise (ed.) (1976) Sociological Methodology, pp: 276-291. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • Marshall, G., A. Swift and S. Roberts (1997) Against the Odds? Social Class and Social Justice in Industrial Societies. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Parish, W. (1981) ‘Egalitarianism in Chinese Society’. Problems of Communism, 29: 37-53.

  • Parsons, T. (1967) Sociological Theory and Modern Society. New York: Free Press.

  • Rose, D. and D. Pevalin (2003) (eds) A Researcher’s Guide to the National Statistics Socio-economic Classification. London: Sage.

  • Treiman, D. (1970) ‘Industrialization and social stratification’. In E. O. Laumann (ed.) Social Stratification: Research and Theory for the 1970s, pp: 207-234. Indianopolis: Bobbs-Merril.

  • Treiman, D. (2012) ‘The “difference between heaven and earth”: Urban-rural disparities in well-being in China’. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 30: 33-47.

  • UNDP. (2010) Regional Report on Human Development. http://hdr.undp.org/en (accessed on 10 September 2012).

  • Wu, X. and D. Treiman (2007) ‘Inequality and Equality under Chinese Socialism: The Hukou System and Intergenerational Occupational Mobility’. American Journal of Sociology, 113(2): 415-445. [Crossref]

  • Yu, H. and X. Liu (2004) ‘Did the Effect of Work Unit on Intergenerational Mobility in Urban China Decline?’ Sociological Studies (in Chinese), 6: 52-63.

About the article

Published Online: 2015-06-30

Citation Information: International Review of Social Research, ISSN (Online) 2069-8534, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/irsr-2015-0003. Export Citation

© Yaojun Li et al.. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in