Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

International Review of Social Research

2 Issues per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2069-8534
See all formats and pricing

Class, Status, and Education: The Influence of Parental Resources on IEO in Europe, 1893-1987

Cinzia Meraviglia
  • Department of Social and Political Sciences, University of Milan, via Conservatorio 7 – 20122 Milan, Italy
/ Maarten L. Buis
  • Department of History and Sociology, Box 40, 78457 Konstanz, Germany
Published Online: 2015-06-30 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/irsr-2015-0004

Abstract:

There is a long tradition of studying the influence of parental background on educational attainment of the offspring. Recently the emphasis in this tradition has shifted to the question of what parental background is. In particular, what contributes to social background, for example parental occupational status, parental occupational class, and/or parental education? Moreover, who contributes to parental background, the mother, the father, or both? In this article we asked the question whether these different components of parental background are stable across time and across countries, or are some components more important in some countries or periods than in other countries or periods. We were able to reject the hypothesis that the contributions of the different components were constant across 29 European countries. In most of these countries we were also able to reject that these contributions were constant over time.

Keywords: Inequality of educational opportunity (IEO); measurement of social origin; dominance method; proportionally weighted regression; sheaf coefficient.

References

  • Acker, J. (1973). Women and social stratification: A case of intellectual sexism. American Journal of Sociology, 78(4), 936-945. [Crossref]

  • Albright, K. (2008), In families or as individuals? Theoretical and methodological problems in the incorporation of women in class analysis, Sociology Compass, 2/5, 1672-1689 [Crossref]

  • Beller, E. (2009). Bringing intergenerational social mobility research into the twenty-first century: why mothers matter. American Sociological Review, 74(4), 507-528 [Crossref]

  • Blalock, H. M. (1964). Causal Inference in Nonexperimental research. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press

  • Blau, P. & Duncan, O.D. (1967), The Americal occupational structure, New York, Wiley

  • Bollen, K. A. (1984). Multiple indicators: internal consistency or no necessary relationship? Quality and Quantity, 18(4), 377-385

  • Bollen, K. A., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological bulletin, 110(2), 305 [Crossref]

  • Boudon, R. (1974), Education, opportunity and social inequality, New York, Wiley

  • Bourdieu, P. & Passeron, J.P. (1977), Reproduction in education, society and culture, New York, Basic Books (La reproduction. Éléments pour une théorie du système d‘enseignement, Paris, Editions de Minuit, 1970)

  • Breen, R. & Goldthorpe, J.H. (1997), Explaining educational differentials: towards a formal rational action theory, Rationality and Society, 9, 275-305

  • Breen, R. (2004). Social Mobility in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press

  • Breen, R., & Jonsson, J. O. (2005). Inequality of opportunity in comparative perspective: Recent research on educational attainment and social mobility. Annual review of sociology, 31, 223-243 [Crossref]

  • Breen, R., Luijkx, R., Müller, W., & Pollak, R. (2009). Nonpersistent Inequality in Educational Attainment: Evidence from Eight European Countries1. American Journal of Sociology, 114(5), 1475-1521

  • Breen, R., Luijkx, R., Müller, W., & Pollak, R. (2010). Long-term Trends in Educational Inequality in Europe: Class Inequalities and Gender Differences. European Sociological Review, 26(1), 31-48 [Crossref]

  • Breen, R., van de Werfhorst, H.G. & Jæger, M.M. (2014), Deciding under doubt: a theory of risk aversion, time discounting preferences, and educational decision making, European Sociological Review, 30(2), 258-270 [Crossref]

  • Buchman, C. & Hannum, E. (2001), Education and stratification in developing countries: a review of theory and research, Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 77-102 [Crossref]

  • Buis, M. L. (2013). The Composition of Family Background: The Influence of the Economic and Cultural Resources of both Parents on the Offspring‘s Educational Attainment in the Netherlands between 1939 and 1991. European Sociological Review, 29(3), 593-602 [Crossref]

  • Bukodi, E., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (2013). Decomposing ‘Social Origins’: The Effects of Parents’ Class, Status, and Education on the Educational Attainment of Their Children. European Sociological Review, 29(5), 1024-1039 [Crossref]

  • Conley, D. (2001), Capital for college: Parental assets and post-secondary schooling, Sociology of Education, 74, 59-72 [Crossref]

  • Crompton, R. (2006). Class and family. The Sociological Review, 54(4), 658-677 [Crossref]

  • Dale, A., Gilbert, G. N., & Arber, S. (1985). Integrating Women into Class Theory. Sociology, 19(3), 384-408 [Crossref]

  • de Luca, D., Meraviglia, C., & Ganzeboom, H. B. G. (2012). Construction and Validation ofa Relational Scale of Occupational Status for Italy. In P. Lambert, R. Conelly, R. M. Blackburn & V. Gayle (Eds.), Social Stratification, Trends and Processes (pp. 29-52). Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishers

  • Dronkers, J. (1995). The effects of the occupations of working mothers on the educational inequality. Educational Research and Evaluation, 1(3), 226-246

  • Duncan, O. D., Featherman, D. L., & Duncan, B. (1972). Socioeconomic Background and Achievement. New York: Seminar Press

  • Edwards, J. R., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2000). On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures. Psychological methods, 5(2), 155 [PubMed] [Crossref]

  • Erikson, R. & Jonsson J.O. (1996), Can education be equalized?, Boulder (CO), Westview

  • Erikson, R. (1984). Social class of men, women and families. Sociology, 18(4), 500-514 [Crossref]

  • Erikson, R., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (1992). Individual or Family? Results from Two Approaches to Class Assignment. Acta Sociologica, 35(2), 95-105 [Crossref]

  • Erikson, R., Goldthorpe, J. H., & Portocarero, L. (1979). Intergenerational class mobility in three Western European societies: England, France and Sweden. British journal of Sociology, 30(4), 415-441 [Crossref]

  • Ganzeboom, H. B. G. & Treiman, D.J. (1993), Preliminary Results on Educational Expansion and Educational Achievement in Comparative Perspective, in H.A. Becker & P.L.J. Hermkens (eds), Solidarity of Generations: Demographic, Economic and Social Change and Its Consequences, Vol. 1, Amsterdam, Thesis Publishers

  • Ganzeboom, H. B. G., & Nikoloski, D. (2012). Codering en schaling van beroepen in de European Social Survey. Research report of the ESS Developmental Project #3 (NWO, 471‐09‐005) “Improving the Measurement of Social Background in the European Social Survey”, http://www.harryganzeboom.nl/Pdf/2013-Ganzeboom-Nikoloski-ESS_dans3_txt&tab.pdf

  • Ganzeboom, H. B. G., & Treiman, D. J. (1996). Internationally comparable measures of occupational status for the 1988 International Standard Classification of Occupations. Social Science Research, 25(3), 201-239 [Crossref]

  • Ganzeboom, H.B.G. & Nieuwbeerta, P. (1999), Access to education in six Eastern European countries between 1940 and 1985. Results of a cross-national survey, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 32, 339-357 [Crossref]

  • Ganzeboom H.B.G. & Schroeder H. (2014), Measuring and modelling levels of education in European societies, European Sociological Review, 30(1), 119-136 [Crossref]

  • Garnsey, E. (1978). Women‘s Work and Theories of Class Stratification. Sociology, 12(2), 223-243 [Crossref]

  • Gesthuizen, M., de Graaf, P. M., & Kraaykamp, G. (2005). The changing family background of the low-educated in the Netherlands: Socio-economic, cultural, and socio-demographic resources. European Sociological Review, 21(5), 441-452 [Crossref]

  • Glaesser, J. & Cooper, B. (2014), Using rational action theory and bourdieu’s habitus theory together to account for educational decision-making in England and Germany, Sociology, 48(3), 463-481 [Crossref]

  • Glucksmann, M. A. (1995). Why ‘Work’? Gender and the ‘Total Social Organization of Labour’. Gender, Work & Organization, 2(2), 63-75

  • Goldthorpe, J. H. (1983). Women and class analysis: in defence of the conventional view. Sociology, 17(4), 465-488 [Crossref]

  • Goldthorpe, J.H. (2007), On sociology, vol. II, Illustration and retrospect, Stanford, Stanford University Press

  • Goldthorpe, J.H. (2014), The role of education in intergenerational social mobility: Problems from empirical research in sociology and some theoretical pointers from economics, Rationality and Society, 26(3), 265-289

  • Halsey, A.H., Heath, A. & Ridge, J. (1980), Origins and destinations, Oxford, Clarendon Press

  • Hauser, R. M., & Goldberger, A. S. (1971). The treatment of unobservable variables in path analysis. Sociological Methodology, 81-117 [Crossref]

  • Hedström, P. & Swedberg, R. (1998), Social mechanisms: An analytical approach to social theory, Cambridge, University of Cambridge Press

  • Hedström, P. (2005), Dissecting the social. On the principles of analytical sociology, Cambridge, University of Cambridge Press

  • Heise, D. R. (1972). Employing nominal variables, induced variables, and block variables in path analyses. Sociological Methods & Research, 1(2), 147-173 [Crossref]

  • Hirsch, F. (1976). Social Limits to Growth. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul

  • Hout, M. and DiPrete, T. A. (2006). What we have learned: RC28 s contributions to knowledge about social stratification. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 24, 1–20

  • Ishida, H., Muller, W. & Ridge, J.M. (1999), Class origin, class destination and education: a cross-national study of ten industrial nations, American Journal of Sociology, 101(1), 145-193 [Crossref]

  • Jæger, M. M. (2007). Educational mobility across three generations: the changing impact of parental social class, economic, cultural and social capital. European Societies, 9(4), 527-550 [Crossref]

  • Jonsson, J.O. & Erikson, R. (2000), Understanding educational inequality. The Swedish experience, L’année Sociologique, 50, 345-382

  • Jonsson, J.O. & Gahler, M. (1997), Family dissolution, family recostitution and children’s educational careers: recent evidence from Sweden, Demography, 34(2), 277-293 [Crossref]

  • Jonsson, J.O. (1987), Class origin, cultural origin and educational attainment, European Sociological Review, 3, 229-242

  • Jonsson, J.O., Mills, C. & Müller, W. (1996), A half century of increasing educational openness? Social class, gender and educational attainment in Sweden, Germany and Britain, in R. Erikson & J.O. Jonsson (eds), Can education be equalized? Boulder (CO), Westview

  • Kalmijn, M. (1994), Mother’s occupational status and children’s schooling, American Sociological Review, 59(2), 257-275 [Crossref]

  • Khazzoom, A. (1997). The Impact of Mother‘s Occupation on Son‘s and Daughter‘s Status Attainment. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 15(1), 57-89

  • Korupp, S., Ganzeboom, H. B. G., & Van Der Lippe, T. (2002). Do Mothers Matter? A Comparison of Models of the Influence of Mothers‘ and Fathers‘ Educational and Occupational Status on Children‘s Educational Attainment. Quality and Quantity, 36(1), 17-42

  • Lareau, A. (2003), Unequal childhoods: class, race and family life, Berkeley (CA), University of California Press

  • Lindbekk T. (1998), The education backlash hypothesis: the Norwegian experience 1960-92, Acta Sociologica, 41, 151-162

  • Lucas, S.R. (2003), Effectively maintained inequality: educatioon transition, track mobility and social background effects, American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1642-1690 [Crossref]

  • Mare, R.D. (1981), Change and stability in educational stratification, American Sociologial Review, 46, 72-97 [Crossref]

  • Marks, G. N. (2008a). Are father’s or mother’s socioeconomic characteristics more important influences on student performance? Recent international evidence. Social Indicators Research, 85(2), 293-309 [Crossref]

  • Marks, G. N. (2008b). Gender Differences in the Effects of Socioeconomic Background Recent Cross-National Evidence. International Sociology, 23(6), 845-863 [Crossref]

  • Marks, G. N. (2011). Issues in the conceptualisation and measurement of socioeconomic background: Do different measures generate different conclusions? Social Indicators Research, 104(2), 225-251 [Crossref]

  • Marks, G.N. (2014), Education, social background and cognitive ability. The decline of the social. New York, Routledge

  • Meraviglia, C. (2013). Classi sociali, famiglie e disuguaglianze di istruzione in Italia, 1899-1984. Quaderni di Sociologia, 62, 105-125

  • Meraviglia, C., & de Luca, D. (2013). Country-specific measures vs internationally-valid measures of occupational stratification. A validation excercise with the ICAMS scale. Paper presented at the RC28 Spring Meeting, Trento

  • Meraviglia, C., & Ganzeboom, H. B. G. (2008). Mothers’ and Fathers’ Influence on Occupational Status Attainment in Italy. POLENA(2), 29-65

  • Milkie, M.A., Mattingly, M.J., Nomaguchi, K.M., Bianchi S.M. & Robinson, J.P. (2004), The time squeeze: parental statuses and feelings about time with children, Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(3), 739–761

  • Müller, W. & Karle, W. (1993), Social selection in educational systems in Europe, European Sociological Review, 9(1), 1-23

  • Muller, W. (2008). Foreword. In Schneider, S. L. (Ed.), The International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED-97). Mannheim: Mannheimer Zentrum fu¨r Europa¨ische Sozialforschung

  • Pfeffer, F.T. (2008), Persistent inequality in educational attainment and its institutional context, European Sociological Review, 24(5), 543-565 [Crossref]

  • Prandy, K. (1990). The Revised Cambridge Scale of Occupations. Sociology, 24(4), 629-655. doi: 10.1177/0038038590024004005 [Crossref]

  • Robinson, R. & Garnier, M. (1985), Class reproduction among men and women in France, American Journal of Sociology, 91, 250-258 [Crossref]

  • Rosenfeld, R. A. (1978). Women‘s employment patterns and occupational achievements. Social Science Research, 7(1), 61-80 [Crossref]

  • Sayer, L.C., Gauthier, A.H. & Furstenberg, F.F. jr. (2004), Educational differences in parents’ time with children: cross-national variations, Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(5), 1152-1169

  • Schneider, S. L. (2009). Confusing Credentials: The Cross-Nationally Comparable Measurement of Educational Attainment. DPhil thesis, University of Oxford, Nuffield College

  • Schröder, H., & Ganzeboom, H. B. G. (2014). Measuring and Modelling Level of Education in European Societies. European Sociological Review, 30(1), 119-136 [Crossref]

  • Shavit, Y., & Blossfeld, H.-P. (1993). Persistent Inequality: Changing Educational Attainment in Thirteen Countries. Social Inequality Series. Boulder, CO: Westview Press

  • Shavit, Y., & Westerbeek, K. (1998). Educational Stratification in Italy: Reforms, Expansion, and Equality of Opportunity. European Sociological Review, 14(1), 33-47. doi: 10.2307/522479 [Crossref]

  • Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of educational research, 75(3), 417-453 [Crossref]

  • Sørensen, A. (1994). Women, Family and Class. Annual review of sociology, 20(1), 27-45 [Crossref]

  • Stanworth, M. (1984). Women and Class Analysis: A Reply to John Goldthorpe. Sociology, 18(2), 159-170 [Crossref]

  • Stewart, A., Prandy, K., & Blackburn, R. M. (1973). Measuring the class structure. Nature, 245(5426), 415-417

  • Stewart, A., Prandy, K., & Blackburn, R. M. (1980). Social Stratification and Occupations. London: MacMillan

  • Tomescu-Dubrow, I. & Domański H. (2010), How to model parental education effects on men’s and women’s attainment? Cross-national assessments of different approaches, ASK Research&Methods, 19(1), 21-50

  • Treiman, D. J. (1970), Industrialization and Social Stratification, in E.O.Laumann (ed), Social Stratification: Research and Theory for the 1970s, Indianapolis, Bobbs-Merrill

  • Treiman, D. J. (1977). Occupational Prestige in Comparative Perspective. New York: Academic Press

  • Treiman, D. J. , Ganzeboom, H.B.G. and Rijken, S. (1998), Educational expansion and educational achievement in comparative perspective, Paper presented at the RC28 Meeting, Taipei (Taiwan), January 7-9 1998)

  • Treiman, D. J., & Terrell, K. (1975). Sex and the process of status attainment: A comparison of working women and men. American Sociological Review, 40(2), 174-200 [Crossref]

  • van Doorn, M., Pop, I., & Wolbers, M. H. J. (2011). Intergenerational transmission of education across European countries and cohorts. European Societies, 13(1), 93-117 [Crossref]

  • Watson, W. B., & Barth, E. A. (1964). Questionable assumptions in the theory of social stratification. Pacific Sociological Review, 7(1), 10-16. [Crossref]

  • Weber, M. (1978), Economy and society, Los Angeles, UCLA Press (Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie, Tübingen, Mohr, 1922)

  • Whitt, H.P (1986), The sheaf coefficient: A simplified and expanded approach. Social Science Research, 15, 174–189. [Crossref]

  • Yamaguchi, K. (2002). Regression models with parametrically weighted explanatory variables. Sociological Methodology, 32, 219-245 [Crossref]

  • Yamaguchi, K., & Wang, Y. (2002). Class Identification of Married Employed Women and Men in America. American Journal of Sociology, 108(2), 440-475 [Crossref]

About the article

Published Online: 2015-06-30


Citation Information: International Review of Social Research, ISSN (Online) 2069-8534, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/irsr-2015-0004. Export Citation

© Cinzia Meraviglia, Maarten L. Buis. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in