Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

International Review of Social Research

2 Issues per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2069-8534
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Food and cultural omnivorism: a reflexive discussion on otherness, interculturality and cosmopolitanism

Joana A. Pellerano / Viviane Riegel
Published Online: 2017-11-14 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/irsr-2017-0003

Abstract

This paper is part of the research project “Cosmopolitismos juvenis no Brasil” (Youth Cosmopolitanisms in Brazil), partner of the international research project “Cultures Juveniles à l’ ère de la globalization”. Our aim for this paper is to understand the connection between food and cosmopolitan experiences, discussing two main perspectives of omnivorism studies - (1) that cultural omnivorism cause long-term indifference for cultural diversity; and (2) that this omnivorism indicates only intercultural curiosity translated into specific distinctive capital in fields of power - and the possibility of these visions of cultural omnivorism turn into a reflexive view of the Other. We applied empirical and bibliographic research, including qualitative research with Brazilians aged between 18 and 24 years who are living in the city of São Paulo, and theoretical reflections related to the fields of food and cultural studies, covering omnivorism, otherness and cosmopolitanism. In the case of the first perspective, there is no possibility of connection to otherness, hence, to cosmopolitanism. The analysis of the second perspective shows that it is possible to find threats of distinction connected to cultural and food omnivorism. Therefore, it is still necessary to develop further studies to understand the reflexive dimension of cosmopolitanism within cultural and food consumption.

Keywords: food omnivorism; cultural omnivorism; otherness; interculturality; cosmopolitanism

References

  • Appadurai, A. (1981) ‘Gastropolitics in Hindu South Asia’. American Ethnologist 8(3):494-511.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beck, Ulrick (2006). Qu´est-ce que le cosmopolitisme? Paris: Aubier. Google Scholar

  • Beck, U. & Grande, E. (2010) “Varieties of Second Modernity: the cosmopolitan turn in social and political theory and research”. The British Journal of Sociology, Volume 61, Issue 3, September.Google Scholar

  • Bourdieu, P. (2007) A Distinção: Crítica Social do Julgamento. São Paulo: Edusp.Google Scholar

  • Bryson, B. (1997) ‘What about the Universe? Musical Dislikes and Group-Based Identity Construction among Americans with Low Levels of Education’. Poetics 25(2-3):141-156.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Campbell, C. (1987) The Romantic Ethic and the Spirit of Modern Consumerism. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Cappeliez, S. and J. Johnston. (2013) ‘From Meat and Potatoes to ‘Real-Deal’ Rotis: Exploring Everyday Culinary Cosmopolitanism’. Poetics 41(5):433-455.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Calhoun, C. (2002) ‘The Class Consciousness of Frequent Travelers: Toward a Critique of Actually Existing Cosmopolitanism’. South Atlantic Quarterly 101(4):869-897.Google Scholar

  • Chamorro-Premuzic, T.; S. Reimers; A. Hsu and G. Ahmetoglu. (2009) ‘Who Art thou? Personality predictors of artistic preferences in a large UK sample: The importance of Openness’. British Journal of Psychology 100(3):501-516.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cicchelli, V.; S. Octobre & V. Riegel. (2016) ‘After the Omnivore, the Cosmopolitan Amateur: Reflexions about Aesthetic Cosmopolitanism’. The Global Studies Journal 9:55-70.Google Scholar

  • Contreras Hernández, J. and M. Gracia-Arnáiz. (2005) Alimentación y cultura: Perspectivas Antropológicas. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar

  • Da Matta, R. (1987) ‘Sobre o simbolismo da comida no Brasil’. O Correio da Unesco 15(7):22-23.Google Scholar

  • Featherstone, M. (2002) ‘Cosmopolis: an Introduction’. Theory, Culture & Society 19:1-2.Google Scholar

  • Fischler, C. (1995) El (H)Ominívoro: El Gusto, la Cocina y el Cuerpo. Barcelona: Anagrama.Google Scholar

  • Germann Molz, J. (2007) ‘Eating Difference: The Cosmopolitan Mobilities of Culinary Tourism’. Space and Culture 10(1):77-93.Google Scholar

  • Glevarec, H. (2009) ‘La Tablature des Goûts Musicaux: un Modèle de Structuration des Préférences et des Jugements’. Revue Française de Sociologie 50(3):599-640.Google Scholar

  • Jonas, T. (2013) ‘Eating the Vernacular, Being Cosmopolitan’. Cultural Studies Review 19(1):117-137.Google Scholar

  • Katz-Gerro, T. and M.M. Jaeger. (2013) ‘Top of the Pops, Ascend of the Omnivores, Defeat of the Couch Potatoes: Modeling Change in Cultural Consumption’. European Sociological Review 29(2):243-260.Google Scholar

  • Lahire, B. (2004) La culture des Individus. Dissonances Culturelles et Distinction de Soi. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

  • Laplantine, F. (2006) Aprender Antropologia. São Paulo: Brasiliense. Google Scholar

  • Naccarato, P. and K. LeBesco. (2012) Culinary capital. London/New York: BERG.Google Scholar

  • Peterson, R. and R. Kern. (1996) ‘Changing Highbrow Taste: From Snob to Omnivore’. American Sociological Review 61:900-907.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pietroluongo, M.A. (1997) ‘O espetáculo do instante: Uma análise das representações sociais do discurso gastronômico francês contemporâneo’. PhD thesis, Department of Languages, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.Google Scholar

  • Roose, H.; K. Van Eijck and J. Lievens. (2012) ‘Culture of distinction or culture of openness: Using a social space approach to analyse the social structuring of lifestyles’. Poetics 40(6):491-513.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rozin, P. (1976) ‘The selection of food by rats, humans and other animals’. pp. 21-76 in Advances in the study of behavior, edited by J. Rosenblatt, R. A. Hinde, C. Beer and E. Shaw. Nova York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • Skrbis, Zlato & Woodward, Ian (2013). Cosmopolitanism: uses of the idea, Sage, London.Google Scholar

  • Sullivan, O. and T. Katz-Gerro. (2007) ‘The Omnivore Thesis Revisited: Voracious Cultural Consumers’. European Sociological Review 23(2):123-37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Swidler, A. (1986) ‘Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies’. American Sociological Review 51:273-286.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Swidler, A. (2001) Talk of Love: How Culture Matters. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Turgeon, L. and M. Pastinelli. (2002) ‘‘Eat the World’: Postcolonial Encounters in Quebec City’s Ethnic Restaurants’. The Journal of American Folklore 115(456):247-268.Google Scholar

  • Warde, A.; L. Martens and W. Olsen. (1999) ‘Consumption and the Problem of Variety: Culture Omnivorousness, Social Distinction and Dining Out’. Sociology 33(1):105-127.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2016-02-01

Accepted: 2016-12-20

Published Online: 2017-11-14

Published in Print: 2017-05-24


Citation Information: International Review of Social Research, Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 13–21, ISSN (Online) 2069-8534, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/irsr-2017-0003.

Export Citation

© 2017. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in