Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Information - Wissenschaft & Praxis

Editor-in-Chief: Reibel-Felten, Margarita

6 Issues per year

CiteScore 2016: 0.06

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.100
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.144

See all formats and pricing
More options …

DataWiz: Integration von Open-Science-Praktiken in den Forschungszyklus

PD Dr. Erich Weichselgartner
  • Corresponding author
  • Leibniz-Zentrum für Psychologische Information und Dokumentation (ZPID), Universitätsring 15, 54296 Trier Germany
  • Email:
Published Online: 2017-05-06 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iwp-2017-0023


  • Baker, M. (2015, August 27). Over half of psychology studies fail reproducibility test: Largest replication study to date casts doubt on many published positive results [News]. Nature. doi:10.1038/nature.2015.18248.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baker, M., & Dolgin, E. (2017, January 19). Reproducibility project yields muddy results: An ambitious effort to replicate cancer studies is provoking controversy [News]. Nature, 541, 269-270. doi:10.1038/541269a.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Castro, A., Hastings, J., Lange, C., Stevens, R., & Weichselgartner, E. (2015). Dagstuhl Manifesto: Digital scholarship and open science in psychology and the behavioral sciences. Informatik Spektrum, 38(6), 572-573. doi:10.1007/s00287-015-0936-3.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chalmers, I., & Glasziou, P. (2009). Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet, 374(9683), 86-89. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60329-9.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Dehnhard, I., Weichselgartner, E., & Krampen, G. (2013). Researcher’s willingness to submit data for data sharing: A case study on a data archive for psychology. Data Science Journal, 12, 172-180. doi:10.2481/dsj.12-037.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fanelli, D. (2009). How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLOS ONE, 4(5), Artikel e5738. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005738.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Macleod, M. R., Michie, S., Roberts, I., Dirnagl, U., Chalmers I., Ioannidis, J. P. A. ... Glasziou, P. (2014). Biomedical research: Increasing value, reducing waste. Lancet, 383(9912), 101-104. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62329-6.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • OECD. (2004). Declaration on Access to Research Data from Public Funding. http://acts.oecd.org/Instruments/ShowInstrumentView.aspx?InstrumentID=157 [13.32017].

  • Piwowar, H. A., Day, R. S., & Fridsma, D. B. (2007). Sharing detailed research data is associated with increased citation rate. PLOS ONE, 2(3), Artikel e308. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000308.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pritsker, M. (2013, November 11). Opinion: Video saved the scientific publication [News]. The Scientist. http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/38082/title/Opinion–Video-Saved-the-Scientific-Publication [13.32017].

  • Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638-641. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schekman, R. (2013, December 9). How journals like Nature, Cell and Science are damaging science. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/dec/09/how-journals-nature-science-cell-damage-science [13.32017]

  • Vines, T. H., Albert, A. Y. K., Andrew, R. L., Débarre, F., Bock, D. G., Franklin, M. T., ... Rennison, D. J. (2014). The availability of research data declines rapidly with article age. Current Biology, 24(1), 94-97. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.11.014.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Weichselgartner, E. (2008). Fünf Jahre Primärdatenarchivierung in der Psychologie: Ein Erfahrungsbericht. In M. Ockenfeld (Hrsg.), Verfügbarkeit von Information (S. 259–267). Frankfurt a. M., Deutschland: DGI.Google Scholar

  • Weichselgartner, E., Günther, A., & Dehnhard, I. (2011). Archivierung von Forschungsdaten. In S. Büttner, H.-C. Hobohm, & L. Müller (Hrsg.), Handbuch Forschungsdatenmanagement (S. 191–202). Bad Honnef, Deutschland: Bock und Herchen. urn:nbn:de:kobv:525-opus-2397.Google Scholar

  • Wicherts, J. M., Borsboom, D., Kats, J., & Molenaar, D. (2006). The poor availability of psychological research data for reanalysis. American Psychologist, 61, 726-728.Google Scholar

  • Wojick, D., & Michaels, P. (2015). A taxonomy to support the statistical study of funding-induced biases in science [version 1; referees: 2 not approved]. F1000Research, 4, Artikel 886. doi:10.12688/f1000research.7094.1.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-05-06

Published in Print: 2017-05-04

Citation Information: Information - Wissenschaft & Praxis, ISSN (Online) 1619-4292, ISSN (Print) 1434-4653, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iwp-2017-0023.

Export Citation

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in