Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Information - Wissenschaft & Praxis

Editor-in-Chief: Reibel-Felten, Margarita

6 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.06

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.100
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.144

Online
ISSN
1619-4292
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Effektivität von Altmetrics in transdisziplinären Forschungsfeldern

Altmetric-Abdeckung von Forschungsoutputs in der Bildungsforschung

Elisabeth Vogler
  • Corresponding author
  • Deutsches Institut für Internationale Pädagogische Forschung (DIPF), Schloßstraße 29, 60486 Frankfurt am MainGermany
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Dr. Christoph Schindler
  • Deutsches Institut für Internationale Pädagogische Forschung (DIPF), Schloßstraße 29, 60486 Frankfurt am MainGermany
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Prof. Dr. Marc Rittberger
  • Deutsches Institut für Internationale Pädagogische Forschung (DIPF), Schloßstraße 29, 60486 Frankfurt am MainGermany
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2017-05-06 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iwp-2017-0035

Dieser Artikel ist eine Kurzfassung des in englischer Sprache verfassten Beitrags im Rahmen des International Symposium of Information Science (ISI) 2017 in Berlin, s. (Vogler et al., 2017).

Literatur

  • Adams, Jonathan; Loach, Tamar (2015). Altmetric mentions and the communication of medical research. Disseminating research outcomes outside academia: Digital Research Reports. London: Digital Science.Google Scholar

  • Andersen, Jens Peter; Haustein, Stefanie (2015). Influence of Study Type on Twitter Activity for Medical Research Papers. In: A. A. Salah (Hg.): Proceedings of ISSI 2015 Istanbul. Istanbul: Bogaziçi.Google Scholar

  • Autorengruppe Bildungsberichterstattung (Ed.). (2016). Bildung in Deutschland 2016. (1. Auflage). Bielefeld: Bertelsmann, W.Google Scholar

  • Bar-Ilan, Judit (2014). Astrophysics publications on arXiv, Scopus and Mendeley: a case study. In: Scientometrics 100 (1), S. 217–225. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-013-1215-1.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Barnes, C. (2015). The Use of Altmetrics as a Tool for Measuring Research Impact. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 46(2), 121–134.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baumann, U. (2005). Interdisziplinarität, Transdisziplinarität, Integralität. Tertium comparationis, 11(1), 3–14.Google Scholar

  • Bornmann, L. (2014a). Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics. Journal of Informetrics, 8(4), 895–903.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bornmann, L. (2014b). Validity of altmetrics data for measuring societal impact: A study using data from Altmetric and F1000Prime. Journal of Informetrics, 8(4), 935–950.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Bornmann, L. (2015). Usefulness of altmetrics for measuring the broader impact of research. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 67(3), 305–319.Google Scholar

  • Bornmann, L. (2016). Measuring impact in research evaluations: A thorough discussion of methods for, effects of and problems with impact measurements. Higher Education. doi:10.1007/s10734-016-9995-x.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Chamberlain, S. (2013). Consuming Article-Level Metrics: Observations and Lessons. Information Standards Quarterly, 25(2), 4–13.Google Scholar

  • Costas, R., Zahedi, Z., & Wouters, P. (2014). Do altmetrics correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective. doi:10.1002/asi.23309.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Costas, R., Zahedi, Z., Wouters, P. (2015). The thematic orientation of publications mentioned on social media. In: Aslib Journal of Information Management, 67(3), 260-288.Google Scholar

  • Dees, W. (2008). Innovative Scientometric Methods for a Continuous Monitoring of Research Activities in Educational Science. In Fourth International Conference on Webometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics & Ninth COLLNET Meeting. Berlin.Google Scholar

  • Dees, W. (2015). Bildungsforschung – eine bibliometrische Analyse des Forschungsfeldes. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.Google Scholar

  • Deutscher Bildungsrat. (1974). Aspekte für die Planung der Bildungsforschung: Klett.Google Scholar

  • Fry, J., & Talja, S. (2004). The cultural shaping of scholarly communication. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 41(1), 20–30.Google Scholar

  • Gibbons, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Holmberg, K., Didegah, F., Bowman, T., & Kortelainen, T. (2015). Measuring the societal impact of open science-Presentation of a research project. Informaatiotutkimus, 34(4). Google Scholar

  • Huutoniemi, K., Klein, J. T., Bruun, H., & Hukkinen, J. (2010). Analyzing interdisciplinarity: Typology and indicators. Research Policy, 39(1), 79–88. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.09.011.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jahn, T., Bergmann, M., & Keil, F. (2012). Transdisciplinarity: Between mainstreaming and marginalization. Ecological Economics, 79, 1–10.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Koier, E., & Horlings, E. (2015). How accurately does output reflect the nature and design of transdisciplinary research programmes? Research Evaluation, 24(1), 37–50. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvu027.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mohammadi, E., & Thelwall, M. (2014). Mendeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(8), 1627–1638.Google Scholar

  • Nederhof, A. J. (2006). Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review. Scientometrics, 66(1), 81–100.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar

  • Peters, I., Jobmann, A., Eppelin, A., Hoffmann, C. P., Künne, S., & Wollnik-Korn, G. (2014). Altmetrics for large, multidisciplinary research groups: a case study of the Leibniz Association. In: Pehar, F., Tanacković, S. F., Bosančić, B. (Eds.): Libraries in Digital Age (LIDA) Proceedings: Vol 13 (2014): Assessing libraries and library users and use. University of ZadarGoogle Scholar

  • Priem, J. (2014). Altmetrics. In B. Cronin & C. R. Sugimoto (Eds.), Beyond bibliometrics. Harnessing multidimensional indicators of scholarly impact (pp. 263–287). Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P., & Neylon, C. (2010). altmetrics: a manifesto. Retrieved from http://www.altmetrics.org/manifesto.

  • Singleton, K., Kuhberg-Lasson, V., Sondergeld, U., & Schultheiß, J. (2015). Publikationen der Bildungsforschung. In A. Botte, U. Sondergeld, & M. Rittberger (Eds.), Monitoring Bildungsforschung. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt, Julius, 67–106.Google Scholar

  • Vogler, E., Schindler, C., Botte, A., Rittberger, M. (2017). Are altmetrics effective in transdisciplinary research fields? : altmetric coverage of outputs in educational research. In: Gäde, M., Trkulja, V., Petras, V. (Eds.). Everything changes, everything stays the same? : proceedings of the 15th International Symposium of Information Science (ISI 2017). Glückstadt: HülsbuschGoogle Scholar

  • Wagner, C., Roessner, J.D., Bobb, K., Klein, J.T., Boyack, K., Keyton, J., Rafols, I., Borner, K. (2011). Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 14–26.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zahedi, Z., Costas, R., & Wouters, P. (2014). How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1491–1513.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Zahedi, Z., Fenner, M., & Costas, R. (2014). How consistent are altmetrics providers? Study of 1000 PLOS ONE publications using the PLOS ALM, Mendeley and Altmetric.com APIs.Google Scholar

  • Zahedi, Z., Fenner, M., & Costas, R. (2015). Consistency among altmetrics data provider/aggregat ors: what are the challenges? In altmetrics15. the 2015 Altmetrics Workshop (pp. [3 S.]). Amsterdam.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-05-06

Published in Print: 2017-05-04


Citation Information: Information - Wissenschaft & Praxis, ISSN (Online) 1619-4292, ISSN (Print) 1434-4653, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iwp-2017-0035.

Export Citation

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in