Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization

Ed. by Azzam, Azzeddine


CiteScore 2017: 0.76

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.325
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.402

Online
ISSN
1542-0485
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Risk and Transactions Cost in Contracting: Results from a Choice-Based Experiment

Darren Hudson / Jayson Lusk
Published Online: 2004-02-06 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1542-0485.1046

Contracting is a contentious issue in agriculture. Competing theories assert that risk or transactions cost drive contracting decisions, with some argument that autonomy also plays a role. We examine preferences for different contract attributes using a choice-based conjoint experiment. Results of a study of agricultural producers show that both risk and transactions cost play a role in contracting decisions. Autonomy also plays a role, especially to the extent that producers wish to avoid total loss of autonomy. These results suggest that the effects of risk and transactions cost are relative and should both be considered when analyzing contracting decisions.

Keywords: risk; transactions cost; autonomy; contracting; choice-based conjoint; experiments; surveys

About the article

Published Online: 2004-02-06


Citation Information: Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, Volume 2, Issue 1, ISSN (Online) 1542-0485, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1542-0485.1046.

Export Citation

©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[3]
Tove Enggrob Boon, Stine Wamberg Broch, and Henrik Meilby
Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 2010, Volume 25, Number 6, Page 564
[4]
Arbi J. Sarkissian, Robert M. Brook, Salma N. Talhouk, and Neal J. Hockley
Forest Systems, 2017, Volume 26, Number 2, Page e012
[5]
Jeffrey M. Peterson, Craig M. Smith, John C. Leatherman, Nathan P. Hendricks, and John A. Fox
American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2015, Volume 97, Number 1, Page 219
[6]
Anastasio J. Villanueva, Klaus Glenk, and Macario Rodríguez-Entrena
Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2017, Volume 68, Number 3, Page 801
[7]
Gert Jan Hofstede, Melanie Fritz, Maurizio Canavari, Elsje Oosterkamp, and Gert‐jan van Sprundel
British Food Journal, 2010, Volume 112, Number 7, Page 671
[8]
Michael Vassalos, Wuyang Hu, Timothy Woods, Jack Schieffer, and Carl Dillon
Agribusiness, 2016, Volume 32, Number 3, Page 379
[9]
Gaetano Martino
Food Economics - Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section C, 2007, Volume 4, Number 1, Page 21

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in