Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization

Ed. by Azzam, Azzeddine

2 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.70

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.223
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.660

Online
ISSN
1542-0485
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Are Consumers as Constrained as Hens are Confined? Brain Activations and Behavioral Choices after Informational Influence

Alex J. Francisco / Amanda S. Bruce
  • Corresponding author
  • University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
  • Children’s Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ John M. Crespi / Jayson L. Lusk / Brandon McFadden / Jared M. Bruce / Robin L. Aupperle / Seung-Lark Lim
Published Online: 2015-11-19 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jafio-2015-0022

Abstract

In 2008, California passed Proposition 2, specifying confinement space for certain farm animals. Proposition 2 went into full effect January 2015 and has significant implications for egg production in California and possibly even interstate commerce. We examined the influence of promotional videos aired during the campaign on consumers’ willingness-to-pay for eggs produced in a more open production system (i.e., cage-free, free range) and corresponding neurofunctional activations during decisions. Forty-six participants (24 females), aged 18–55 years (M=29.65), were enrolled and performed a food decision-making task during fMRI scanning. In each decision, two options of identical one dozen cartons of eggs were presented simultaneously. Below each option were two attributes, describing price and production method. Cage free and free-range eggs were more expensive, at varying degrees. Participants were randomized to one of three 30-second video groups: pro-Proposition 2, anti-Proposition 2, and a Neutral flowing stream. Based on a whole brain analysis, participants in the pro-Proposition 2 video group (N=16) demonstrated significantly greater activations post-video compared to pre-video in left insular cortex and right occipital cortex. This change in insula activity may be indicative of increased social risk involved with the purchase of closed production method eggs, driving participants to increase their percentage of decisions to purchase the higher priced, open-method eggs. It is possible that the insula activation indicates that consumers are constrained to choosing the eggs produced under open-cage production methods, after viewing advertisements advocating for Proposition 2.

Keywords: eggs; insula; decision-making; production methods

References

  • Allender, W. J., and T. J. Richards. 2010. “Consumer Impact of Animal Welfare Regulation in the California Poultry Industry.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 35:424–42.Google Scholar

  • Baltzer, K.. 2004. “Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Food Quality—the Case of Eggs.” Food Economics 1:78–90.Google Scholar

  • Bettman, J. R., M. F. Luce, and J. W. Payne. 1998. “Constructive Consumer Choice Processes.” Journal of Consumer Research 25:187–217.Google Scholar

  • Brooks, K. R., and J. L. Lusk. 2012. “Public and Private Preferences for Animal Cloning Policies.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 37:485–501.Google Scholar

  • Camus, M., N. Halelamien, H. Plassmann, S. Shimojo, J. O’Doherty, C. Camerer, and A. Rangel. 2009. “Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over the Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Decreases Valuations During Food Choices.” European Journal of Neuroscience 30:1980–8.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Chang, J. B., J. L. Lusk, and F. B. Norwood. 2010. “The Price of Happy Hens: A Hedonic Analysis of Retail Egg Prices.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 35:406–23.Google Scholar

  • Cherry, J. B. C., J. M. Bruce, J. L. Lusk, J. M. Crespi, S.-L. Lim, and A. S. Bruce. 2015. “Neurofunctional Correlates of Ethical, Food-Related Decision-Making.” PLoS ONE 10 (4):e0120541. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Craig, A. D. 2009. “How do you Feel–Now? The Anterior Insula and Human Awareness.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 10 (1):59–70. doi:.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Friston, K. J., A. P. Halmes, J.-B. Poline. et al. 1995 “Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited.” NeuroImage 2 (1):45–53. doi:.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Hare, T. A., J. Malmaud, and A. Rangel. 2011. “Focusing Attention on the Health Aspects of Foods Changes Value Signals in vmPFC and Improves Dietary Choice.” Journal of neuroscience 31 (30):11077–87.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Kahnt, T., J. Heinzle, S. Q. Park, and J. D. Haynes. 2011. “Decoding Different Roles for vmPFC and dlPFC in Multi-Attribute Decision Making.” NeuroImage 56:709–15.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Karipidis, P., E. Tsakiridou, N. Tabakis, and K. Mattas. 2005. “Hedonic Analysis of Retail Egg Prices.” Journal Food Distribution Research 36:68–73.Google Scholar

  • Knutson, B., S. Rick, G. E. Wimmer, D. Prelec, and G. Loewenstein. 2007. “Neural Predictors of Purchases.” Neuron 53 (1):147–56. doi:.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Kumar, D., and K. Raju. 2013. “The Role of Advertising in Consumer Decision Making.” IOSR Journal of Business and Management 14 (4):37–45.Google Scholar

  • Linder, N. S., G. Uhl, K. Fliessbach, P. Trautner, C. E. Elger, and B. Weber. 2010. “Organic Labeling Influences Food Valuation and Choice.” NeuroImage 53:215–20.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Lusk, J. L.. 2010. “The Effect of Proposition 2 on the Demand for Eggs in California.” Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization 8 (1):Article 3.Google Scholar

  • McFadden, B. R., J. L. Lusk, J. M. Crespi, J. B. C. Cherry, L. E. Martin, R. L. Aupperle, and A. S. Bruce. 2015. “Can Neural Activation in Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Predict Responsiveness to Information? an Application to Egg Production Systems and Campaign Advertising.” PLoS ONE 10 (5):e0125243. doi:.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Mills, S. D. H., L. M. Tanner, and J. Adams. 2013. “Systematic Literature Review of the Effects of Food and Drink Advertising on Food and Drink-Related Behaviour, Attitudes and Beliefs in Adult Populations.” Obesity Reviews 14:303–14. doi: 10.1111/obr.12012.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Norwood, F. B., and J. L. Lusk. 2011. “A Calibrated Auction-Conjoint Valuation Method: Valuing Pork and Eggs Produced Under Differing Animal Welfare Conditions.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 62:80–94.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Talairach, J., and P. Tournoux. 1988. Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain. New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers.Google Scholar

  • Tonsor, G. T., C. Wolf, and N. Olynk. 2009. “Consumer Voting and Demand Behavior Regarding Swine Gestation Crates.” Food Policy 34:492–8.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Yokoyama, R., T. Nozawa, M. Sugiura, Y. Yomogida, H. Takeuchi, Y. Akimoto, S. Shibuya, and R. Kawashima. 2014. “The Neural Bases Underlying Social Risk Perception in Purchase Decisions.” NeuroImage 91:120–8.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2015-11-19

Published in Print: 2015-01-01


Funding United States Department of Agriculture (Grant/Award Number: 2011-67023-30047)


Citation Information: Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, ISSN (Online) 1542-0485, ISSN (Print) 2194-5896, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jafio-2015-0022.

Export Citation

©2015 by De Gruyter. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in