Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization

Ed. by Azzam, Azzeddine


CiteScore 2018: 0.57

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.324
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.398

Online
ISSN
1542-0485
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Mergers and Acquisitions (M&As), Market Structure and Inventive Activity in the Agricultural Biotechnology Industry

James F. Oehmke / Anwar NaseemORCID iD: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3394-8116
Published Online: 2015-03-18 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jafio-2014-0011

Abstract

This article explores the relationships among mergers and acquisitions (M&A), consolidation, concentration and inventive activity in the agricultural biotechnology industry. We adapt testable hypotheses from the conceptual literature. We empirically test each hypothesis and interpret the results in terms of existing explanations of consolidation and the level of inventive activity, and antitrust policy. We find aggregate inventive activity to be related to M&A activity, but whether the effect is positive or negative is dependent on the type of M&A. Further, greater number of public sector firms in the research market, as well as increasing industry concentration, are both found to increase overall innovation.

Keywords: agricultural biotechnology; research and development; mergers and acquisitions; industry concentration

References

  • Arora, A., and A. Gambardella. 1990. “Complementarity and External Linkages: The Strategies of the Large Firms in Biotechnology.” Journal of Industrial Economics 38: 361–79.Google Scholar

  • Barton, J. 1998. “The Impact of Contemporary Patent Law on Plant Biotechnology Research.” In Intellectual Property Rights III Global Genetic Resources: Access and Property Righths, edited by S. A. Eberhart, H. L. Shands, W. Collins, R. L. Lower, 85–100. Madison, WI: Crop Science Society of America.Google Scholar

  • Brennan, M. F., C. E. Pray, and A. Courtmanche. 1999. “Impact on Industry Concentration on Innovation in the U.S. Plant Biotech Industry.” Presented at the Transition in Agro Biotechnology Conference, June 24–25, 1999, Washington, DC.

  • Brennan, M., C. Pray, A. Naseem, and J. F. Oehmke. 2005. “An Innovation Market Approach to Analyzing Impacts of Mergers and Acquisitions in the Plant Biotechnology Industry.” AgBioforum 8: 89–99.Google Scholar

  • Butler, L. J., and M. W. Marion. 1985. “Importance of Public Plant Breeders and Competition in the Seed Industry.” Journal of Agronomic Education 14: 11–15.Google Scholar

  • Dasgupta, P., and J. Stiglitz. 1980. “Industrial Structure and the Nature of Innovative Activity.” Economic Journal 90: 266–93.Google Scholar

  • David, P. A., B. H. Hall, and A. Toole. 1999. “Is Public R&D a Complement or Substitute for Private R&D? A Reveiw of the Econometric Evidence.” Working Paper. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Dosi, G. 1988. “Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation.” Journal of Economic Literature 26: 1120–71.Google Scholar

  • Farber, S. 1981. “Buyer Market Structure and R&D Effort: A Simultaneous Equations Model.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 63: 336–45.Google Scholar

  • Fernandez-Cornejo, J., and R. E. Just. 2007. “Researchability of Modern Agricultural Input Markets and Growing Concentration.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89: 1269–75.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Fuglie, K., P. Heisey, J. King, K. Day-Rubenstein, D. Schimmelpfennig, S. L. Wang, and R. Karmarkar-Deshmukh. 2011. “Research Investments and Market Structure in the Food Processing, Agricultural Input, and Biofuel Industries Worldwide.” Economic Research Report. Washington, DC: USDA-ERS.

  • Fuglie, K. O., and T. S. Walker. 2001. “Economic Incentives and Resource Allocation in U S Public and Private Plant Breeding.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 33: 459–73.Google Scholar

  • Gilbert, R. 2006. “Looking for Mr. Schumpeter: Where Are We in the Competition-Innovation Debate?” In Innovation Policy and the Economy, Vol. 6, edited by A. Jaffe, J. Lerner, and S. Stern, 159–215. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Graff, G. D., G. C. Rausser, and A. A. Small. 2003. “Agricultural Biotechnology’s Complementary Intellectual Assets.” Review of Economics and Statistics 85: 349–63.Google Scholar

  • Grossman, S. J., and O. D. Hart. 1986. “The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration.” The Journal of Political Economy 94: 691–719.Google Scholar

  • Hausman, J., B. H. Hall, and Z. Griliches. 1984. “Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship.” Econometrica 52: 909–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Johnson, S. R., and T. A. Melkonyan. 2003. “Strategic Behavior and Consolidation in the Agricultural Biotechnology Industry.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85: 216–33.Google Scholar

  • Jovanovic, B., and G. M. MacDonald. 1994. “The Life Cycle of a Competitive Industry.” Journal of Political Economy 102: 322–47.Google Scholar

  • Kalaitzandonakes, N., and B. Bjornson. 1997. “Vertical and Horizontal Coordination in the Agro- Biotechnology Industry: Evidence and Implications.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 29: 129–39.Google Scholar

  • Knott, A. M., and H. E. Posen. 2003. “Does Competition Increase Innovation? New Evidence from Old Industries.” Working paper Mack Center for Technological Innovation.

  • Lee, T., and L. L. Wilde. 1980. “Market Structure and Innovation: A Reformulation.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 94: 429–36.Google Scholar

  • Levin, R. C., W. M. Cohen, and D. C. Mowery. 1985. “R & D Appropriability, Opportunity, and Market Structure: New Evidence on Some Schumpeterian Hypotheses.” The American Economic Review 75: 20–24.Google Scholar

  • Loury, G. C. 1979. “Market Structure and Innovation.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 93: 395–410.Google Scholar

  • Marco, A. C., and G. C. Rausser. 2008. “The Role of Patent Rights in Mergers: Consolidation in Plant Biotechnology.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90: 133–51.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Reinganum, J. F. 1989. “The Timing of Innovation: Research, Development, and Diffusion.” In Handbooks in Economics, no. 10, Volume 1, edited by R. Schmalensee, and R. D. Willig, 849–908. Amsterdam: North-Holland, distributed in the U.S. and Canada by Elsevier Science.Google Scholar

  • Schenkelaars, P., H. de Vriend, and N. G. Kalaitzandonakes. 2011. “Drivers of Consolidation in the Seed Industry and Its Consequence for Innovation.”

  • Scherer, F. M. 1965. “Corporate Inventive Output, Profits, and Growth.” Journal of Political Economy 73: 290–97.Google Scholar

  • Scherer, F. M. 1967. “Market Structure and the Employment of Scientists and Engineers.” The American Economic Review 57: 524–531.Google Scholar

  • Schimmelpfennig, D. E., C. E. Pray, and M. F. Brennan. 2004. “The Impact of Seed Industry Concentration on Innovation: A Study of U.S. Biotech Market Leaders.” Agricultural Economics 30: 157–67.Google Scholar

  • Schumpeter, J. A. 1950. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York, NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

  • Scott, J. T. 1987. “Firm versus Industry Variability in R&D Intensity.” In R&D, Patents, and Productivity in Z. Griliches, 233–248. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Shi, G., J.–P. Chavas, and K. Stiegert. 2010. “An Analysis of the Pricing of Traits in the US Corn Seed Market.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 92: 1324–38.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Spence, M. 1984. “Cost Reduction, Competition, and Industry Performance.” Econometrica 52: 101–21.Google Scholar

  • Syemeonidis, G. 1996. Innovation, Firm Size and Market Structure: Schumpeterian Hypotheses and Some New Themes. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Teece, D. J. 1986. “Profiting From Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy.” Research Policy 15: 285–305.Google Scholar

  • United States Department of Justice. 2007. Justice Department Requires Divestures in $1.5 Billion Merger of Monsanto and Delta and Pine Land. Washington, DC: Press Release. May 31, 2007.Google Scholar

  • Wooldridge, J. M. 1997. “Quasi-Likelihood Methods for Count Data.” In Handbook of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 2, edited by H. Peseran and P. Schmidt, 352–406. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Wooldridge, J. M. 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2015-03-18

Published in Print: 2016-01-01


Citation Information: Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages 19–32, ISSN (Online) 1542-0485, ISSN (Print) 2194-5896, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jafio-2014-0011.

Export Citation

©2016 by De Gruyter.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in