Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Applied Geodesy

Editor-in-Chief: Kahmen, Heribert / Rizos, Chris


CiteScore 2018: 1.61

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.532
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.064

Online
ISSN
1862-9024
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 3, Issue 1

Issues

Quality assessment of a network-based RTK GPS service in the UK

Jose Aponte / Xiaolin Meng / Chris Hill / Terry Moore / Mark Burbidge / Alan Dodson
Published Online: 2009-05-26 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/JAG.2009.003

Abstract

Network-based Real Time Kinematic (NRTK) GPS positioning is considered to be a superior solution compared to the conventional single reference station based Real Time Kinematic (RTK) GPS positioning technique whose accuracy is highly affected by the distance dependent errors such as satellite orbital and atmospheric biases. NRTK GPS positioning uses raw measurements gathered from a network of Continuously Operating Reference Stations (CORS) in order to generate more reliable error models that can mitigate the distance dependent errors within the area covered by the CORS. This technique has been developed and tested considerably during recent years and the overall performance in terms of achievable accuracies, reliability and mobility is as good as or even better than can be achieved using the conventional RTK GPS positioning technique.

Currently, there are several commercial NRTK services around the world. In the United Kingdom (UK), for instance, Leica Geosystems in partnership with Ordnance Survey has been offering a NRTK GPS service since 2006. This service is called SmartNet and it can provide continuous centimetric level of accuracy to its subscribers.

However, NRTK GPS positioning is particularly constrained by wireless data link coverage, correction transmission delay and completeness, GPS signal availability, etc., which could downgrade the positioning quality of the NRTK results.

The paper presents some preliminary testing results of an investigation of the SmartNet service from the end users' point of view. A snapshot of the service's performance was carried out as part of a recent PhD studentship jointly awarded by the UK's Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) and Leica Geosystems (UK) to conduct comprehensive research into NRTK GPS quality control measures at the Institute of Engineering Surveying and Space Geodesy (IESSG), the University of Nottingham. In order to evaluate the service's quality several static and kinematic tests were performed using the same type of equipment and in the same way that the SmartNet subscribers would have used it.

Centimetric accuracy was generally attained during both static and kinematic tests. This high accuracy was only affected by some level of unavailability mainly caused by GPS signal blockage. Additionally, the influence of the number of satellites in view, dilution of precision (DOP) and age of corrections (AoC) over the accuracy and stability of the NRTK GPS solution was also investigated during this research and presented in the paper.

Keywords.: Network RTK GPS; RTCM; GPRS; performance; accuracy; quality assessment criteria

About the article

Received: 2008-04-09

Accepted: 2008-11-09

Published Online: 2009-05-26

Published in Print: 2009-03-01


Citation Information: Journal of Applied Geodesy, Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 25–34, ISSN (Online) 1862-9024, ISSN (Print) 1862-9016, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/JAG.2009.003.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Hannu Koivula, Jaakko Kuokkanen, Simo Marila, Sonja Lahtinen, and Tuukka Mattila
Journal of Geodetic Science, 2018, Volume 8, Number 1, Page 136
[2]
Enrique Cano-Jódar, Manuel Sánchez-de-la-Orden, and Javier Mesas-Carrascosa
DYNA, 2018, Volume 85, Number 206, Page 114
[3]
Massimiliano Pepe
Geodesy and cartography, 2018, Volume 44, Number 2, Page 36
[4]
Khin Cho Myint, Abd Nasir Matori, Adel Gohari, N. Mohamed Noor, and A.W. Azhari
E3S Web of Conferences, 2018, Volume 34, Page 01019
[5]
Gil Rito Gonçalves, Juan Antonio Pérez, and João Duarte
International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2018, Page 1
[6]
Linqiang Yang, Guoquan Wang, Victor Huérfano, Christa G. von Hillebrandt-Andrade, Jose A. Martínez-Cruzado, and Hanlin Liu
Natural Hazards, 2016, Volume 83, Number 1, Page 641
[7]
R. Tu, L. Wang, and Z. Liu
Survey Review, 2016, Volume 48, Number 347, Page 79
[8]
S. J. Edwards, P. J. Clarke, N. T. Penna, and S. Goebell
Survey Review, 2010, Volume 42, Number 316, Page 107
[9]
Ma Selmira Garrido, Elena Gimenez, Ma Clara de Lacy, and Gil
IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2013, Volume 6, Number 6, Page 2421
[10]
Grant Hausler and Philip Collier
Journal of Spatial Science, 2013, Volume 58, Number 2, Page 191
[11]
M Selmira Garrido, Elena Giménez, M Clara de Lacy, and Antonio J. Gil
Journal of Spatial Science, 2011, Volume 56, Number 2, Page 169
[12]
M. Garrido, E. Giménez, J. Armenteros, M. Lacy, and A. Gil
Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Hungarica, 2012, Volume 47, Number 1, Page 52
[13]
Elena Giménez, Mattia Crespi, M. Selmira Garrido, and Antonio J. Gil
International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2012, Volume 16, Page 94
[14]
Mª Selmira Garrido, Elena Giménez, Mª Clara de Lacy, and Antonio J. Gil
International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2011, Volume 13, Number 2, Page 256
[15]
Elena Giménez, M Selmira Garrido, M Clara de Lacy, and Antonio J. Gil
Journal of Applied Geodesy, 2011, Volume 5, Number 1

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in