Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Applied Geodesy

Editor-in-Chief: Kahmen, Heribert / Rizos, Chris


CiteScore 2018: 1.61

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.532
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.064

Online
ISSN
1862-9024
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 7, Issue 3

Issues

North American height datums and their offsets: Evaluation of the GOCE-based global geopotential models in Canada and the USA

Babak Amjadiparvar
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Geomatics Engineering, University of Calgary 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Michael G. Sideris / Elena V. Rangelova
Published Online: 2013-08-06 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2012-0033

Abstract

The Gravity field and steady-state Ocean Circulation Explorer (GOCE) dedicated satellite gravity field mission was launched on March 17, 2009. Three generations of global geopotential models have been computed and released based on the data collected by GOCE since then. The first generation of the models has been computed from the first two months of the data, and more observations, ranging from six to eight months, have been used in the computation of the second generation models. The third generation models are based on eighteen months of GOCE observations. The evaluation of these models is important in view of Canada’s and the USA’s decision to modernize and unify their vertical datums based on the geoid. In this paper, the released GOCE-based models are evaluated using 1315 and 18399 GNSS/levelling stations in Canada and the USA, respectively. In addition, three GRACE-based models and EGM2008 are included in the evaluation procedure as ’pre-GOCE era’ models to identify any improvements brought by the new GOCE-based models in the region. The results provide evidence that the third generation time-wise (go_cons_gcf_2_tim_r3) and direct approach (go_cons_gcf_2_dir_r3) GOCE models perform slightly better than the rest of the geopotential models in Canada and the USA

Keywords: GOCE geoid; vertical datum; height systems unification; GOCE omission error; evaluation; NAVD88

About the article

Published Online: 2013-08-06

Published in Print: 2013-08-01


Citation Information: Journal of Applied Geodesy, Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages 191–203, ISSN (Online) 1862-9024, ISSN (Print) 1862-9016, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2012-0033.

Export Citation

© 2013 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co..Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Dimitrios Bolkas, Georgia Fotopoulos, and Alexander Braun
Journal of Geodesy, 2016, Volume 90, Number 6, Page 561

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in