Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Applied Geodesy

Editor-in-Chief: Kahmen, Heribert / Rizos, Chris

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2017: 1.23

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.445
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.357

Online
ISSN
1862-9024
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 11, Issue 4

Issues

Indoor positioning using differential Wi-Fi lateration

Guenther Retscher
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Geodesy and Geoinformation, TU Wien – Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Thomas Tatschl
Published Online: 2017-09-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2017-0011

Abstract

For Wi-Fi positioning usually location fingerprinting or (tri)lateration are employed whereby the received signal strengths (RSSs) of the surrounding Wi-Fi Access Points (APs) are scanned on the mobile devices and used to perform localization. Within the scope of this study, the position of a mobile user is determined on the basis of lateration. Two new differential approaches are developed and compared to two common models, i.e., the one-slope and multi-wall model, for the conversion of the measured RSS of the Wi-Fi signals into ranges. The two novel methods are termed DWi-Fi as they are derived either from the well-known DGPS or VLBI positioning principles. They make use of a network of reference stations deployed in the area of interest. From continuous RSS observations on these reference stations correction parameters are derived and applied by the user in real-time. This approach leads to a reduced influence of temporal and spatial variations and various propagation effects on the positioning result. In practical use cases conducted in a multi-storey office building with three different smartphones, it is proven that the two DWi-Fi approaches outperform the common models as static positioning yielded to position errors of about 5 m in average under good spatial conditions.

Keywords: Wi-Fi positioning; lateration; differential approach; path loss models; RSS to range conversion

References

  • [1]

    Avenau L, Masson E, Combeau P (2010) RaPSor: a Radio Propagation Simulator, Presentation and Use Cases. Product Presentation, acessed March 27, 2017 at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228735225_RaPSor_a_Radio_Propagation_Simulator_Presentation_and_Use_Cases.Google Scholar

  • [2]

    Durgin G, Patwari N, Rappaport T S (1997) An Advanced 3D Ray Launching Method for Wireless Propagation Prediction. IEEE 47th Vehicular Technology Conference, Phoenix, Arizona, USA, 785–789.Google Scholar

  • [3]

    Hofer H, Retscher G. (2016) Combined Out- and Indoor Navigation with Smart Phones Using Intelligent Check Points. 13th International Symposium on Location-Based Services LBS 2016, November 14–16, 2016, Vienna, Austria, 82–90.Google Scholar

  • [4]

    Kaemarungsi K, Krishnamurthy P (2004) Properties of Indoor Received Signal Strength for WLAN Location Fingerprinting. Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Networking and Services MOBIQUITOUS 2004, 14–23.Google Scholar

  • [5]

    Landau H, Vollath U, Chen X (2002) Virtual Reference Station Systems. Journal of Global Positioning Systems, 1:2, 137–143.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [6]

    Luntovskyy A, Gütter D, Melnyk I (2012) Planung und Optimierung von Rechnernetzen. Springer Science and Business Media (in German).Google Scholar

  • [7]

    Metter M, Bucher R (2007) Industrial Ethernet in der Automatisierungstechnik: Planung und Einsatz von Ethernet-LAN-Techniken im Umfeld von SIMATIC-Produkten, Publicis Corporate Publishing, 2nd edition, Erlangen, Germany (in German).Google Scholar

  • [8]

    Ramlow S, Peterhanwahr J (2008) Industrial Wireless. Dr.-Ing. Paul Christiani GmbH & Co KG, 1st edition, Konstanz, Germany.Google Scholar

  • [9]

    Retscher G, Hofer H. (2017) Wi-Fi Location Fingerprinting Using an Intelligent Checkpoint Sequence. Journal of Applied Geodesy, 11:3, 197–205.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [10]

    Retscher G, Roth F (2017) Wi-Fi Fingerprinting with Reduced Signal Strength Observations from Long-time Measurements. In: Gartner G, Huang H (eds.) Progress in Location-Based Services 2016, Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography, ISBN 978-3-319-47289-8, DOI , 3-24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [11]

    Schuh W-D (1984) Rasche und einfache automatische Fehlererkennung bei großen Datenmengen. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Vermessungswesen, 72:4, 137–147 (in German).Google Scholar

  • [12]

    Wanninger L (2002) Virtual Reference Stations for Centimeter-Level Kinematic Positioning. ION GPS 2002, Portland, Oregeon, USA, 1400–1407.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2017-03-28

Accepted: 2017-08-14

Published Online: 2017-09-01

Published in Print: 2017-12-01


Citation Information: Journal of Applied Geodesy, Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages 249–269, ISSN (Online) 1862-9024, ISSN (Print) 1862-9016, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2017-0011.

Export Citation

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Yan Li, Simon Williams, Bill Moran, Allison Kealy, and Guenther Retscher
Sensors, 2018, Volume 18, Number 8, Page 2602

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in