Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Applied Geodesy

Editor-in-Chief: Kahmen, Heribert / Rizos, Chris

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 1.09

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.367
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.908

Online
ISSN
1862-9024
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 11, Issue 4

Issues

Indoor positioning using differential Wi-Fi lateration

Guenther Retscher
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Geodesy and Geoinformation, TU Wien – Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Thomas Tatschl
Published Online: 2017-09-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2017-0011

Abstract

For Wi-Fi positioning usually location fingerprinting or (tri)lateration are employed whereby the received signal strengths (RSSs) of the surrounding Wi-Fi Access Points (APs) are scanned on the mobile devices and used to perform localization. Within the scope of this study, the position of a mobile user is determined on the basis of lateration. Two new differential approaches are developed and compared to two common models, i.e., the one-slope and multi-wall model, for the conversion of the measured RSS of the Wi-Fi signals into ranges. The two novel methods are termed DWi-Fi as they are derived either from the well-known DGPS or VLBI positioning principles. They make use of a network of reference stations deployed in the area of interest. From continuous RSS observations on these reference stations correction parameters are derived and applied by the user in real-time. This approach leads to a reduced influence of temporal and spatial variations and various propagation effects on the positioning result. In practical use cases conducted in a multi-storey office building with three different smartphones, it is proven that the two DWi-Fi approaches outperform the common models as static positioning yielded to position errors of about 5 m in average under good spatial conditions.

Keywords: Wi-Fi positioning; lateration; differential approach; path loss models; RSS to range conversion

References

  • [1]

    Avenau L, Masson E, Combeau P (2010) RaPSor: a Radio Propagation Simulator, Presentation and Use Cases. Product Presentation, acessed March 27, 2017 at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228735225_RaPSor_a_Radio_Propagation_Simulator_Presentation_and_Use_Cases.Google Scholar

  • [2]

    Durgin G, Patwari N, Rappaport T S (1997) An Advanced 3D Ray Launching Method for Wireless Propagation Prediction. IEEE 47th Vehicular Technology Conference, Phoenix, Arizona, USA, 785–789.Google Scholar

  • [3]

    Hofer H, Retscher G. (2016) Combined Out- and Indoor Navigation with Smart Phones Using Intelligent Check Points. 13th International Symposium on Location-Based Services LBS 2016, November 14–16, 2016, Vienna, Austria, 82–90.Google Scholar

  • [4]

    Kaemarungsi K, Krishnamurthy P (2004) Properties of Indoor Received Signal Strength for WLAN Location Fingerprinting. Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Networking and Services MOBIQUITOUS 2004, 14–23.Google Scholar

  • [5]

    Landau H, Vollath U, Chen X (2002) Virtual Reference Station Systems. Journal of Global Positioning Systems, 1:2, 137–143.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [6]

    Luntovskyy A, Gütter D, Melnyk I (2012) Planung und Optimierung von Rechnernetzen. Springer Science and Business Media (in German).Google Scholar

  • [7]

    Metter M, Bucher R (2007) Industrial Ethernet in der Automatisierungstechnik: Planung und Einsatz von Ethernet-LAN-Techniken im Umfeld von SIMATIC-Produkten, Publicis Corporate Publishing, 2nd edition, Erlangen, Germany (in German).Google Scholar

  • [8]

    Ramlow S, Peterhanwahr J (2008) Industrial Wireless. Dr.-Ing. Paul Christiani GmbH & Co KG, 1st edition, Konstanz, Germany.Google Scholar

  • [9]

    Retscher G, Hofer H. (2017) Wi-Fi Location Fingerprinting Using an Intelligent Checkpoint Sequence. Journal of Applied Geodesy, 11:3, 197–205.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [10]

    Retscher G, Roth F (2017) Wi-Fi Fingerprinting with Reduced Signal Strength Observations from Long-time Measurements. In: Gartner G, Huang H (eds.) Progress in Location-Based Services 2016, Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography, ISBN 978-3-319-47289-8, DOI , 3-24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [11]

    Schuh W-D (1984) Rasche und einfache automatische Fehlererkennung bei großen Datenmengen. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Vermessungswesen, 72:4, 137–147 (in German).Google Scholar

  • [12]

    Wanninger L (2002) Virtual Reference Stations for Centimeter-Level Kinematic Positioning. ION GPS 2002, Portland, Oregeon, USA, 1400–1407.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2017-03-28

Accepted: 2017-08-14

Published Online: 2017-09-01

Published in Print: 2017-12-01


Citation Information: Journal of Applied Geodesy, Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages 249–269, ISSN (Online) 1862-9024, ISSN (Print) 1862-9016, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2017-0011.

Export Citation

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in