Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Applied Geodesy

Editor-in-Chief: Kahmen, Heribert / Rizos, Chris

CiteScore 2017: 1.23

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.445
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.357

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 12, Issue 3


Research on the impact factors of GRACE precise orbit determination by dynamic method

Nan-nan Guo
  • Corresponding author
  • First Crust Monitoring and Application Center, China Earthquake Administration, Tianjin, China
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Xu-hua Zhou / Kai Li / Bin Wu
Published Online: 2018-05-04 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2018-0008


With the successful use of GPS-only-based POD (precise orbit determination), more and more satellites carry onboard GPS receivers to support their orbit accuracy requirements. It provides continuous GPS observations in high precision, and becomes an indispensable way to obtain the orbit of LEO satellites. Precise orbit determination of LEO satellites plays an important role for the application of LEO satellites. Numerous factors should be considered in the POD processing. In this paper, several factors that impact precise orbit determination are analyzed, namely the satellite altitude, the time-variable earth’s gravity field, the GPS satellite clock error and accelerometer observation. The GRACE satellites provide ideal platform to study the performance of factors for precise orbit determination using zero-difference GPS data. These factors are quantitatively analyzed on affecting the accuracy of dynamic orbit using GRACE observations from 2005 to 2011 by SHORDE software. The study indicates that: (1) with the altitude of the GRACE satellite is lowered from 480 km to 460 km in seven years, the 3D (three-dimension) position accuracy of GRACE satellite orbit is about 3∼4 cm based on long spans data; (2) the accelerometer data improves the 3D position accuracy of GRACE in about 1 cm; (3) the accuracy of zero-difference dynamic orbit is about 6 cm with the GPS satellite clock error products in 5 min sampling interval and can be raised to 4 cm, if the GPS satellite clock error products with 30 s sampling interval can be adopted. (4) the time-variable part of earth gravity field model improves the 3D position accuracy of GRACE in about 0.5∼1.5 cm. Based on this study, we quantitatively analyze the factors that affect precise orbit determination of LEO satellites. This study plays an important role to improve the accuracy of LEO satellites orbit determination.

Keywords: onboard GPS observation; zero-difference dynamic method; impact factors; precise orbit determination


  • [1]

    Bock H, Jaggi A, Beutler G, et al. GOCE: precise orbit determination for the entire mission. Journal of Geodesy, 88(2014), 1047–1060.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [2]

    Bruinsma S. The DTM-2013 thermosphere model. Journal of Space Weather & Space Climate, 5(2015).Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [3]

    Chen Q J, Shen Y Z, Chen W, et al. An improved GRACE monthly gravity field solution by modeling the non-conservative acceleration and attitude observation errors. Journal of Geodesy, 90(2016), 503–523.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [4]

    Guo N N, Zhou X H, Wu B. Rapid precise orbit determination for Haiyang-2A using on-board GPS data (in Chinese). Journal of Astronautics, 36(2015), 797–803.Google Scholar

  • [5]

    Guo N N, Zhou X H, Wu B, Zhao G. A model of the time-variable gravity field inverted from combined GRACE on-board GPS and KBR range rate data. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 7(2017), 2568–2577.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [6]

    Guo J, Zhao Q L, Li M, Hu Z G. Centimeter level orbit determination for HY2A using GPS data (in Chinese). Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 38(2013), 52–55.Google Scholar

  • [7]

    Jaggi A, Dahle C, Arnold D, et al. Swarm kinematic orbits and gravity fields from 18 months of GPS data. Advances in Space Research, 57(2016), 218–233.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [8]

    van den Ijssel J, Encarnacao J, Doornbos E, Visser P. Precise science orbits for the Swarm satellite constellation. Advances in Space Research, 56(2015), 1042–1055.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [9]

    Kang Z G, Tapley B, Bettadpur S, Ries J, Nagel P, Pastor R. Precise orbit determination for the GRACE mission using only GPS data. Journal of Geodesy, 80(2006), 322–331.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [10]

    Kang Z G, Tapley B D, Bettadpur S, Ries J, Nagel P. Precise orbit determination for GRACE using accelerometer data. Advances in Space Research, 38(2006), 2131–2136.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [11]

    Lemoine J M, Bruinsma S, Loyer S, et al. Temporal gravity field models inferred from GRACE data. Advances in Space Research, 39(2007), 1620–1629.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [12]

    Lyard F, Lefevre F, Letellier T, Francis O. Modelling the global ocean tides: modern insights from FES2004. Ocean Dynamics, 56(2006), 394–415.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [13]

    Peng D J, Wu B. The Effect of GPS Ephemeris on the Accuracy of Precise Orbit Determination of LEO Satellite-borne GPS. Chinese Astronomy and Astrophysics, 33(2009), 206–216.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [14]

    Peng D J, Wu B. Application of Accelerometer Data in Precise Orbit Determination of GRACE-A and-B. Chinese Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 5(2008), 603–610.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [15]

    Petit G, Luzum B. IERS Conventions (2010), IERS Technical Note No. 36, International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service, Verlag des Bundesamts für Kartographie und Geodäsie, Frankfurt, Germany, 2009.

  • [16]

    Rim H J. TOPEX Orbit Determination Using GPS Tracking System, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, 1992.Google Scholar

  • [17]

    Schall J, Eicker A, Kusche J. The ITG-Goce02 gravity field model from GOCE orbit and gradiometer data based on the short arc approach. Journal of Geodesy, 88(2014), 403–409.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [18]

    Švehla D, Rothacher M. Kinematic and reduced-dynamic precise orbit determination of low earth orbiters. Advances in Geosciences, 1(2003), 47–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [19]

    Tapley B, Ries J, Bettadpur S, et al. GGM02 – An improved Earth gravity field model from GRACE. Journal of Geodesy, 79(2005), 467–478.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [20]

    Visser P, Van Den Ijssel J. Aiming at a 1-cm orbit for Low Earth Orbiters: Reduced-dynamical and kinematic precise orbit determination. Space Science Review, (108)2003, 27–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [21]

    Weigelt M, Van Dam T, Jaggi A, et al. Time-variable gravity signal in Greenland revealed by high-low satellite-to-satellite tracking. Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth, 118(2013), 3848–3859.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [22]

    Zhao Q L, Guo J, Hu Z G, et al. GRACE gravity field modeling with an investigation on correlation between nuisance parameters and gravity field coefficients. Advances in Space Research, 47(2011), 1833–1850.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [23]

    Zhao Q L, Liu J N, Ge M R, Shi C, Du R L. Precise Orbit Determination of GPS and CHAMP Satellites with PANDA Software (in Chinese). Crustal Deformation & Earthquake, 25(2005), 113–116.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2018-01-31

Accepted: 2018-04-15

Published Online: 2018-05-04

Published in Print: 2018-07-26

Funding Source: National Natural Science Foundation of China

Award identifier / Grant number: 11573053

Award identifier / Grant number: 11173049

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11573053, 11173049) and Science and Technology Innovation Fund of First Crust Monitoring and Application Center, China Earthquake Administration (Grant No. FMC2018003).

Citation Information: Journal of Applied Geodesy, Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages 249–257, ISSN (Online) 1862-9024, ISSN (Print) 1862-9016, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2018-0008.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Kai Li, Xuhua Zhou, Wenbin Wang, Yang Gao, Gang Zhao, Enzhe Tao, and Kexin Xu
Sensors, 2018, Volume 18, Number 8, Page 2671

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in