Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Applied Geodesy

Editor-in-Chief: Kahmen, Heribert / Rizos, Chris


CiteScore 2018: 1.61

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.532
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.064

Online
ISSN
1862-9024
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Ahead of print

Issues

Assessment of BeiDou’s Tropospheric Model (IGGtrop) for tropospheric delay correction in northern hemisphere

Ashraf Farah
Published Online: 2019-10-31 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2019-0015

Abstract

Satellite navigation systems face different types of errors that affect the positioning accuracy. The tropospheric delay considers one of the major sources of error for the transmitted signal that could face a tropospheric delay of over 2 m at zenith and 20 m at lower satellite elevation angles. A positioning error of 10 m could result from inaccurate mitigation of the tropospheric delay. Two types of models are available; surface meteorological models and global empirical models. Surface meteorological models use surface meteorological data to give accurate mitigation while the global empirical models use global standard atmospheres. Global empirical models are favorable for satellite based augmentation systems such as EGNOS model for the EGNOS augmentation system. Several hybrid neutral atmosphere delay models have been developed (UNB1 through UNB4). The IGGtrop model is initially developed to provide tropospheric delay corrections for the users of Chinese BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS) and its augmentation system. This paper presents an assessment study for the behaviour of IGGtrop model comparing with (EGNOS, UNB3M) models. The behavior of the three models is compared with IGS-tropospheric estimations for two different-latitude IGS stations; (bhr1 and eil1) in the northern hemisphere. This study recommends using IGGtrop model for estimating the zenith tropospheric delay correction for low-latitude regions in northern hemisphere for all seasons with an average zenith tropospheric difference of 0.75 cm. IGGtrop model is also recommended to be used for estimating the zenith tropospheric delay correction for high-latitude geographic regions in northern hemisphere during autumn and spring seasons with an average zenith tropospheric difference of 0.75 cm. While UNB3M model is the best choice for tropospheric delay correction for high-latitude geographic regions in northern hemisphere during winter and summer seasons with an average zenith tropospheric difference of 1.1 cm.

Keywords: EGNOS model; UNB3m model; IGGtrop model; Troposphere; BeiDou

References

  • [1]

    COESA 1966. U. S. Standard Atmosphere Supplements (1966). U. S. Committee on Extension to the Standard Atmosphere. Sponsored by Environmental Science Services Administration, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, United States Air Force and published by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C.

  • [2]

    J.P. Collins and R.B. Langely (1997). A Tropospheric Delay Model for the User of the Wide Area Augmentation System. Final contract report prepared for Nav Canada, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering Technical Report No. 187, University of New Brunswick, Federiction, N.B., Canada.

  • [3]

    A.H. Dodson, W. Chen, H.C. Baker, N.T. Penna, G.W. Roberts, J. Westbrook, and R. Jeans (1999). Assessment of EGNOS Tropospheric Correction Model. Proceeding of ION GPS-99, The 12th International Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation, Nashville, Tenn., September 14–17, pp. 1401–1407.Google Scholar

  • [4]

    J.M. Dow, R.E. Neilan, C. Rizos (2009). The international GNSS service in a changing landscape of global navigation satellite systems. Journal of Geodesy, 83:191–198.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [5]

    A. Farah (2004). GPS/GALILEO Simulation for Reduced Dynamic LEO Satellite Orbit Determination. PhD thesis. The Nottingham University. UK.

  • [6]

    IGS (2019). International GNSS Service, zenith tropospheric delay corrections. (ftp://cddis.gsfc.nasa.gov/gps/products/troposphere/zpd/). (Accessed date 10/1/2019).Google Scholar

  • [7]

    M. Kanamitsu, W. Ebisuzaki, J. Woollen (2002). NCEP-DEO AMIP-II reanalysis (R-2). Bull Atmos Met Soc, 83:1631–1643.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [8]

    R. Leonardo, Marcelo Santos, and Richard B. Langley (2006). UNB Neutral Atmosphere Models: Development and Performance. ION, national technical meeting.

  • [9]

    W. Li , Y.B. Yuan, J.K. Ou, H. Li, Z.S. Li (2012). A new global zenith tropospheric delay model IGGtrop for GNSS applications. Chin Sci Bull, 57:2132–2139. doi:.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [10]

    W. Li, Y. Yuan, J. Ou, Y. Chai, Z. Li, Y. Liou, N. Wang (2015). New versions of the BDS/GNSS zenith tropospheric delay model IGGtrop. Journal of Geodesy, 89, 73–80.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [11]

    V.B. Mendes (1999). Modeling the Neutral-Atmosphere Propagation Delay in Radiometric Space Techniques. PhD dissertation, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering Technical Report No. 199, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada, 353 pp.

  • [12]

    A.E. Niell (1996). Global Mapping Functions for the Atmospheric Delay at Radio Wavelengths, J Geophys Res, 101(B2):3227–3246.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [13]

    N. Penna, A. Dodson, and W. Chen (2001). Assessment of EGNOS Tropospheric Correction Model. J Navigation, 54(1):37–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [14]

    RTCA, Inc. (2001). DO-229C, Minimum Operational Performance Standards for Global Positioning System/ Wide Area Augmentation System Airborne Equipment, SC-169, RTCA, Inc., Washington, D. C.

  • [15]

    E.K. Smith and S. Weintraub (1953). The Constants in the Equation for The Atmospheric Refractive Index at Radio Frequencies. In: Proceeding of the Inst. Of Radio Engineers, 41, pp 1035–1057.Google Scholar

  • [16]

    M. Ueno, K. Hoshinoo, K. Matsunaga, M. Kawai, H. Nakao, and R.B. Langley (2001). Assessment of Atmospheric Delay Correction Models for the Japanese MSAS. Proceedings of ION GPS 2001, 14th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation, Salt Lake City, UT, 11–14 September 2001, pp. 2341–2350.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2019-04-26

Accepted: 2019-10-19

Published Online: 2019-10-31


Citation Information: Journal of Applied Geodesy, ISSN (Online) 1862-9024, ISSN (Print) 1862-9016, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2019-0015.

Export Citation

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in