Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Applied Geodesy

Editor-in-Chief: Kahmen, Heribert / Rizos, Chris


CiteScore 2018: 1.61

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.532
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.064

Online
ISSN
1862-9024
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Ahead of print

Issues

Assessment of ArcGIS based extraction of geoidal undulation compared to National Geospatial Intelligence Agency (NGA) model – A case study

Sher Muhammad
  • Corresponding author
  • Institute of International Rivers and Eco-security, Yunnan University, 650500 Kunming, China
  • International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), Kathmandu, Nepal
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Lide Tian
  • Institute of International Rivers and Eco-security, Yunnan University, 650500 Kunming, China
  • CAS Center of Excellence in Tibetan Plateau Earth Sciences, 100101 Beijing, China
  • Yunnan Key Laboratory of International Rivers and Transboundary Eco–security, 650091 Kunming, China
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2019-10-31 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2019-0030

Abstract

Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) and remote sensing Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) represent earth’s surface elevation with reference to ellipsoid and orthometric heights. Proper estimation of the geoid (difference of ellipsoid and orthometric heights) is necessary before comparing data referenced to the different vertical datum. In this paper, an error in estimating EGM96 orthometric height is highlighted, verified by NGA/NASA developed model and MATLAB®. A significant error was found in the ArcGIS derived EGM96 orthometric heights range between ±6.9 meters. In addition, interpolation of low-resolution geoid data also produces significant biases depending on geographic location and the number of the interpolation data point. The bias was maximum negative in the central part of Tibetan Plateau and Himalaya. Therefore, estimation of orthometric height similar to NGA/NASA model precision is necessary for comparison of DEMs for natural resources management, 3D modelling and glaciers mass balance mainly in the mountainous regions.

Keywords: EGM96; geoid; DEM; ArcGIS

References

  • [1]

    Becker, M. (2012) Geodesy: Springer Handbook of Geographic Information. Springer H. Springer Nature. Available at: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-540-72680-7_8.Google Scholar

  • [2]

    Dennis G.M., and Dru A.S., (2007) ‘Converting GPS Height into NAVD88 Elevation with the GEOID96 Geoid Height Model’, National Geodetic Survey, NOAA.

  • [3]

    Fotopoulos, G. (2003) ‘An Analysis on the Optimal Combination of Geoid, Orthometric and Ellipsoidal Height Data by’, Department of Geomatics Engineering, University of Calgary, (20185), p. 230.

  • [4]

    Hipkin, R. G. (2004) ‘Ellipsoidal geoid computation’, Journal of Geodesy, 78, pp. 167–179. doi: .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [5]

    Hirt, C., Filmer, M. S. and Featherstone, W. E. (2010) ‘Comparison and validation of the recent freely available ASTER-GDEM ver1, SRTM ver4.1 and GEODATA DEM-9s ver3 digital elevation models over Australia’, Australian Journal of Earth Sciences. Taylor & Francis, 57(3), pp. 337–347. doi: .CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [6]

    Hoffmann, J. and Walter, D. (2006) ‘How complementary are SRTM-X and -C band digital elevation models?’, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 72(3), pp. 261–268. doi: .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [7]

    Holmes, R. (2014) The Dinghy Bible: The complete guide for novices and experts. A&C Black.Google Scholar

  • [8]

    Kolecka, N. and Kozak, J. (2014) ‘Assessment of the Accuracy of SRTM C- and X-Band High Mountain Elevation Data: a Case Study of the Polish Tatra Mountains’, Pure Appl. Geophys, 171, pp. 897–912. doi: .CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [9]

    Kotsakis, C. (2008) ‘Transforming ellipsoidal heights and geoid undulations between different geodetic reference frames’, JOURNAL of Geod. doi: .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [10]

    Muhammad, S. and Zulfiqar, A. (2015) ‘An optimal approach for the development of precise regional geoid in Pakistan through a comparative study with least square collocation and FFT techniques’, Arabian Journal of Geosciences, pp. 7481–7498. doi: .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [11]

    Muhammad, S., Tian, L., 2016. ‘Changes in the ablation zones of glaciers in the western Himalaya and the Karakoram between 1972 and 2015’, Remote Sens. Environ. 187, pp. 505–512. .CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [12]

    Muhammad, S., Tian, L., Khan, A., 2019. ‘Early twenty-first century glacier mass losses in the Indus Basin constrained by density assumptions’, J. Hydrol. 574, pp. 467–475. .CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [13]

    Muhammad, S., Tian, L., Nüsser, M., 2019. ‘No significant mass loss in the glaciers of Astore Basin (North-Western Himalaya), between 1999 and 2016’, J. Glaciol. 65, pp. 270–278. .CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [14]

    Rapp, R. (1989) ‘Gravity anomalies: statistical analysis’, Geophysics. Springer. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers (Encyclopedia of Earth Science), pp. 617–622. doi: .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [15]

    Rizos, C. (1997) Principles and practice of gps surveying, Monograph.

  • [16]

    Witold, F. (2003) Mean Sea Level, GPS, and the Geoid, ESRI Applications Propotype Lab.

About the article

Received: 2019-06-26

Accepted: 2019-10-10

Published Online: 2019-10-31


This work is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 41530748, No.  41671072).


Author contributions: S. M. designed the study. S. M. carried out all the analysis and wrote the manuscript to which L. T. contributed.

Conflict of interest: Both the authors declare no competing financial and non-financial interests.


Citation Information: Journal of Applied Geodesy, ISSN (Online) 1862-9024, ISSN (Print) 1862-9016, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2019-0030.

Export Citation

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in