Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
In This Section

Journal of Artificial General Intelligence

The Journal of the Artificial General Intelligence Society

3 Issues per year

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
In This Section

Is Logic in the Mind or in the World? Why a Philosophical Question can Affect the Understanding of Intelligence

Hanns Sommer
  • Universität Kassel, Fachbereich 15 Mönchebergstr. 7 D-34119 Kassel
/ Lothar Schreiber
  • Universität Kassel, Fachbereich 15 Mönchebergstr. 7 D-34119 Kassel
Published Online: 2012-05-17 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10229-011-0014-4


Dreyfus' call ‘to make artificial intelligence (AI) more Heideggerian‘ echoes Heidegger's affirmation that pure calculations produce no ‘intelligence’ (Dreyfus, 2007). But what exactly is it that AI needs more than mathematics? The question in the title gives rise to a reexamination of the basic principles of cognition in Husserl's Phenomenology. Using Husserl's Phenomenological Method, a formalization of these principles is presented that provides the principal idea of cognition, and as a consequence, a ‘natural logic’. Only in a second step, mathematics is obtained from this natural logic by abstraction.

The limitations of pure reasoning are demonstrated for fundamental considerations (Hilbert's ‘finite Einstellung’) as well as for the task of solving practical problems. Principles will be presented for the design of general intelligent systems, which make use of a natural logic.

Keywords: Cognition; Natural logic; Intelligence; Husserl; Hilbert

  • Ayer, A. J. 1956. The problem of knowlegde. Penguin Books, London.

  • Barber, M. 2009. Holism and Horizon: Husserl and McDowell on Non-conceptual Content. Husserl Stud. 25:1-14. doi: 10.1007/s10743-008-9035-5. [Crossref]

  • Batterman, R. 2009. On the Explanatory Role of Mathematics in Empirical Science. British J. Philosophy of Science 1-25. doi: 10.1093/bjps/axp018. [Crossref]

  • Benferhat, S. 2010. Interventions and belief cange in possibilistic graphical models. Artificial Intelligence 174(2):177-189.

  • Broonen, J.-P. 2010. Volition and the Theora of Planned Behaviour: How to Fill the Gap Between Intention and Performance? In Dubois, D., ed., Computing Anticipatory Systems, volume 1303, 315-323. CASYS'09 Ninth International Conference.

  • Canestri, J. 2012. Sprache, Neurowissenschaft und Psychoanalyse. Forum Psychoanalyse. DOI:10.1007/s00451-011-0092-6. [Crossref]

  • Chandrasekharan, S. 2009. Building to Discover: A Common Coding Model. Cognitive Science 33:1059-1086.

  • Chater, N. 2008. Rational and Mechanistic Perspectives on Reinforcement Learning. Cognition. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.06.014. [Crossref] [PubMed]

  • Dreyfus, H. L. 2007. Why Heideggerian AI Failed and how Fixing it would Require making it more Heideggerian. Artificial Intelligenc 171(18):1137-1160.

  • Dürrbaum, A.; Scherm, W.; and Sommer, H. 2008. Systemidentifikation mittels Glaubenskalkül. Automatisierungstechnik 7:350-356.

  • Erdinast-Vulcan, D. 2007. That Which ‘Has No Name in Philosophy’: Merleau-Ponty and the Language of Literature. Hum. Stud. 30:395-409. doi: 10.1007/s10746-007-9069-2. [Crossref]

  • Froese, T., and Ziemke, T. 2009. Enactive Artificial Intelligence: Investigating the Systematic Organization of Life and Mind. Artificial Intelligence 173(3-4):466-500.

  • Goertzel, B., and Pennachin, C. 2007. Artificial general intelligence. New York: Springer.

  • Hajicek, P., and Tolar, J. 2009. Intrinsic Properties of Quantum Systems. Found. Phys. doi: 10.1007/s10701-009-9296-7. [Crossref]

  • Hartimo, M. 2011. Husserl's Pluralistic Phenomenology of Mathematics. Philosophia Mathematica. DOI:10.1093phimat/nkr032.

  • Hernandez-Grallo, J., and Dowe, D. 2010. Measuring Universal Intelligence: Towards an Anytime Intelligence Test. Artificial Intelligence. doi: 10.1016/j.artint.2010.09.006. [Crossref]

  • Herzenberg, C. 2008. Grete Hermann: An early contributor to Quantum Theory. arXiv: 0812.3986[quant-ph].

  • Hilbert, D. 1964. Hilbertiana, fünf Aufsätze. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftl. Buchgesellschaft.

  • Hopp, W. 2009. Phenomenology and Fallibility. Husserl Stud. 25:1-14. [Crossref]

  • Hornberger, K. 2009. Introduction to Decoherence Theory. Lect. Notes Phys. 768:223-278.

  • Husserl, E. 1913. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und einer phänomenologischen Philosophie. Hamburg: Meiner.

  • Hutter, M. 2009a. Open Problems in Universal Induction and Intelligence. arXiv: 0907.0746v1[cs.AI]4July2009.

  • Hutter, M. 2009b. Feature Reinforcement Learning: Part I. Unstructured MDPs. J. Artificial General Intelligence 1:3-24.

  • Kosowski, L. 2012. The structure of noema in the process of objectivation. Husserl Stud. doi: 10.1007/s10743-012-9102-9. [Crossref]

  • Kuusela, M.; Vatanen, T.; Malmi, E.; Raiko, T.; Aaltonen, T.; and Nagai, Y. 2011. Semi-supervised anomaly detection - towards model independent searches of new physics. arXiv: 1102.3329v1[physics.data-an] 14 Dec 2011.

  • Legg, S., and Hutter, M. 2007. Universal Intelligence: A Definition of Machine Intelligence. Minds and Machines 17(4):391-444.

  • Leitgeb, H., and Ladyman, J. 2008. Criteria of Identity and Structuralist Ontology. Philosophia Mathematica III(16):388-396.

  • Macbeth, D. 2011. Seeing how it goes: Paper-and-pencil reasoning in mathematical practice. Philosophia Mathematica. DOI:10.1093phimat/nkr006.

  • Maddy, P. 2007. Second Philosophy: A Naturalistic Method. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Mittelstaedt, P. 2011. The problem of interpretation of modern physics. Foundation of Physics. DOI:10.1007/10701-011-9571-2. [Crossref]

  • Moran, D. 2008. Husserl's Transcendental Philosophy and the Critique of Naturalism. Cont. Philos. Rev. doi: 10.1007/s11007-008-9088-3. [Crossref]

  • Pollock, J. L. 2006. Against Optimality: Logical Foundations for Decision-Task Planning in Autonomous Agents. Computational Intelligence 20(1):1-25. [Crossref]

  • Schlosshauer, M. 2008. Classicality, the Ensemble Interpretation, and Decoherence: Resolving the Hyperion Dispute. Found. Phys. doi: 10.1007/s10701-008-9237-x. [Crossref]

  • Schmid, U., and Kitzelmann, E. 2011. Inductive rule learning on the knowledge level.

  • Schreiber, L., and Sommer, H. 2010. Can Mathematics be Justified by Natural Logic? In Dubois, D., ed., Computing Anticipatory Systems, volume 1303, 189-198. CASYS'09 Ninth International Conference.

  • Sher, G. 2010. Is logic in the mind or in the world? Synthese. doi: 10.1007/S11229-010-9796-1. [Crossref]

  • Sommer, H. 2009. Emergence of Classical Reality From a Quantum Mechanical Background. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 39:1027-1036.

  • Srivastava, S.; Immerman, N.; and Zilberstein, S. 2010. A New Representation and Associated Algorithms for Generalized Planning. Artificial Intelligence. doi: 10.1016/j.artint.2010.10.006. [Crossref]

  • Stenlund, S. 2010. Different senses of finitude: An inquiry into Hilbert's finitism. Synthese. doi: 10.1007/S11229-010-9823-2. [Crossref]

  • Stuckey, W.; Silberstein, M.; and Cifone, M. 2009. Reconciling Spacetime and the Quantum: Relational Blockworld and the Quantum Liar Paradox. Found. Phys. 38:348-383. doi: 10.1007/s10701-008-9206-4. [Crossref]

  • Symons, J. 2008. Computational Models of Emergent Properties. Minds and Machines. doi: 10.1007/s11023-008-9120-8. [Crossref]

  • Tarrazo, M. 2004. Schopenhauer's prolegomenon to fuzziness. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making 3:227-254.

  • Tversky, A., and Kahnemann, D. 1983. Extension versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probabiliy judgment. Psychological Review 90(4):293-315.

  • Veness, J.; Ng, K.; Hutter, M.; and Silver, D. 2009. A Monte Carlo AIXI Approximation. arXiv: 0909.0801v1[cs.AI]4Sep, 2009.

  • Wang, P. 1994. From inheritance relations to nonaxiomatic logic. Int. J. of approximate Reasoning 11:281-319.

  • Wang, P. 2007. Three Fundamental Misconceptions of Artificial Intelligence. J. Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 19(3):249-268.

  • Wang, P. 2009. Formalization of Evidence: Comparative Study. J. Artificial General Intelligence 1:25-53.

  • Wang, P. 2011. From NARS to a thinking machine. http://www.cis.temple.edu/~pwang/

  • Weyl, H. 1968. Gesammelte Werke, volume 3. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer. chapter The Gost of Modality, 684-709.

  • Yager, R. 1994. Aggregation operators and fuzzy systems modeling. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 67(2):129-145.

  • Zeh, H. 1999. The Meaning of Decoherence. arXiv: quant-ph/9905004v2 29.6.1999.

  • Zuh, D. 2011. Wogegen wandte sich Husserl 1891? Husserl Stud. doi: 10.1007/s10743-11-9100-3. [Crossref]

  • Zurek, W. 1998. Relative States and the Environment: Einselection, and the Existential Interpretation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 356:1793-1821. arXiv: [quant-ph]9805065.

  • Zurek, W. 2007. Relative States and the Environment: Einselection, Envariance, Quantum Darwinismus, and the Existential Interpretation. arXiv: 0707.2832v1[quant-ph]19.7.2007.

About the article

Published Online: 2012-05-17

Citation Information: Journal of Artificial General Intelligence, ISSN (Online) 1946-0163, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10229-011-0014-4. Export Citation

This content is open access.

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Axel Dürrbaum, Andreas Kroll, and Hanns-Jakob Sommer
at - Automatisierungstechnik, 2012, Volume 60, Number 10, Page 600

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in