Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Ancient History

Ed. by Farney, Gary

Online
ISSN
2324-8114
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Sexual Damage to Slaves in Roman Law

Matthew J. Perry
Published Online: 2015-05-29 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jah-2015-0016

Abstract

There was an expectation in Roman society that slaves would be sexually active, and sources generally represent such conduct as a positive and beneficial social practice. Only if the owner disapproved, or was unaware of the encounter, was the sexual interaction deemed illicit—and potentially damaging to slaves in ways that diminished their value. This paper explores the legal evidence addressing the issue of “damage to slaves” in order to investigate evolving notions of the perceived harm wrought by illicit sexual intercourse. It is possible to see Roman jurists articulating the notion of moral or character damage, as something distinct from physical harm. Such was the extraordinarily destructive capacity of sexuality that it might diminish even society’s lowest-ranking members.

Keywords: Roman Law; Sex; Slavery; Status; Morality

Bibliography

  • Adams, J. N. The Latin Sexual Vocabulary. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins U. P., 1982.Google Scholar

  • Birks, Peter. “The early history of iniuria.” TRG 37 (1969): 163–208.Google Scholar

  • Bonfiglio, Barbara. Corruptio Servi. Milan: Giuffrè, 1998.Google Scholar

  • Bradley, Keith. Slaves and Masters in the Roman Empire: a study in social control. New York: Oxford U. P., 1984.Google Scholar

  • Bradley, Keith. Slavery and Society at Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 1994.Google Scholar

  • Buckland, William Warwick. The Roman Law of Slavery. New York: AMS, 1908.Google Scholar

  • Buckland, William Warwick. A Textbook of Roman Law from Augustus to Justinian. Third Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 1963.Google Scholar

  • Corbino, Alessandro. Il danno qualificato e la lex Aquilia. Corso di diritto romano. Second Edition. Padua: CEDAM, 2008.Google Scholar

  • Crawford, M. H., editor. Roman Statutes. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies Supplement 64. London: Institute of Classical Studies, 1996.Google Scholar

  • Crook, J. A. “ Lex Aquilia.” Athenaeum n.s. 62 (1984): 67–77.Google Scholar

  • Cursi, M. Floriana. Iniuria cum damno. Antigiuridicità e colpevolezza nella storia del danno aquiliano. Milan: Giuffrè, 2002.Google Scholar

  • Cursi, M. Floriana. “What did occidere iniuria in the lex Aquilia actually mean?” Roman Legal Tradition 7 (2011): 16–29.Google Scholar

  • Daube, David. “On the third chapter of the lex Aquilia.” Law Quarterly Review 52 (1936): 253–268.Google Scholar

  • De Francesco, Anna. “Autodifesa privata e iniuria nelle Dodici Tavole.” In Le Dodici Tavole. Dai Decemviri agli Umanisti, edited by Michael Humbert, 415–440. Pavia: IUSS, 2005.Google Scholar

  • du Plessis, Paul. “Damaging a Slave.” In Judge and Jurist: essays in memory of Lord Rodger of Earlsferry, edited by Andrew Burrows, David Johnson, and Reinhard Zimmermann, 157–165. Oxford: Oxford U. P., 2013.Google Scholar

  • Edwards, Catharine. The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 1993.Google Scholar

  • Evans-Jones, Robin and MacCormack, Geoffrey. “Obligations.” In A Companion to Justinian’s Institutes, edited by Ernest Metzger, 127–207. Ithaca: Cornell U. P., 1998.Google Scholar

  • Fantham, Elaine. “Stuprum: public attitudes and penalties for sexual offences in Republican Rome.” EMC 35, n.s. 10 (1991): 267–291.Google Scholar

  • Fernández Prieto, Marta. “El esclavo en el delito de iniuriae.” Dereito: Revista Xurídica da Universidade de Santiago de Compostela 6.1 (1997): 7–34.Google Scholar

  • Fischler, Susan. “Social stereotypes and historical analysis: the case of the imperial women at Rome.” In Women in Ancient Societies, edited by Leonie J. Archer, Susan Fischler, and Maria Wyke, 115–133. New York: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar

  • Frier, Bruce W. and Kehoe, Dennis P. “Law and economic institutions.” In The Cambridge Economic History of the Greco-Roman World, edited by Walter Scheidel, Ian Morris, and Richard P. Saller, 113–143. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 2007.Google Scholar

  • Fusco, Stefania. “De iniuriis quae servis fiunt: un caso di rilevanza giuridica della persona servi?” In Homo, caput, persona: la costruzione giuridica dell’identità nell’esperienza romana, edited by Alessandro Corbino, Michel Humbert, and Giovanni Negri, 427–433. Pavia: IUSS, 2010.Google Scholar

  • Gamauf, Richard. “Zur Frage ‘Sklaverei und Humanität’ anhand von Quellen des römischen Rechts.” In Fünfzig Jahre Forschungen zur antiken Sklaverei an der mainzer Akademie 1950–2000. Miscellanea zum Jubiläum, edited by Heinz Bellen and Heinz Heinan, 51–72. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 2001.Google Scholar

  • Gamauf, Richard. “Cum aliter nulla domus tuta esse possit ... : fear of slaves and Roman law.” In Fear of Slaves-Fear of Enslavement in the Ancient Mediterranean. Peur de l’esclave-Peur de l’esclavage en Mediterranee, edited by Anastasia Serghidou, 145–164. Besaçon: Presses universitaires de Franche-Comté, 2007.Google Scholar

  • Gardner, Jane F. Women in Roman Law and Society. Bloomington: Indiana U. P., 1986.Google Scholar

  • Hagemann, Matthias. Iniuria von den XII Tafeln bis zur justinianischen Kodification. Cologne: Böhlau, 1998.Google Scholar

  • Harper, Kyle. Slavery in the Late Roman World, AD 275–425. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 2011.Google Scholar

  • Honoré, A. M. “Linguistic and social context of the lex Aquilia.” Irish Jurist 7 (1972): 138–150.Google Scholar

  • Humbert, Michel, editor. Le Dodici Tavole. Dai Decemviri agli Umanisti. Pavia: IUSS, 2005.Google Scholar

  • Joshel, Sandra. “Female desire and the discourse of empire.” In Roman Sexualities, edited by Judith P. Hallet and Marilyn B. Skinner, 221–254. Princeton: Princeton U. P., 1997.Google Scholar

  • Langlands, Rebecca. Sexual Morality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 2006.Google Scholar

  • Lenel, Otto. Das Edictum perpetuum. Third Edition. Leipzig: B. Tauchnitz, 1927.Google Scholar

  • Manfredini, Arrigo. Contributo allo studio dell’iniuria in età repubblicana. Milan: Giuffrè, 1977.Google Scholar

  • McGinn, Thomas. Prostitution, Sexuality, and the Law in Ancient Rome. Oxford: Oxford U. P., 1998.Google Scholar

  • McGinn, Thomas. The Economy of Prostitution in the Roman World. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 2004.Google Scholar

  • Mommsen, Theodor, editor. Digesta Iustiniani Augusti. Berlin: Weidmann, 1870.Google Scholar

  • Morabito, Marcel. Les réalités de l’esclavage d’après le Digeste. Paris: Annales Littéraires de l’Université de Besançon, 1981.Google Scholar

  • Morel, Jean-Paul. “Early Rome and Italy.” In The Cambridge Economic History of the Greco-Roman World, edited by Walter Scheidel, Ian Morris, and Richard P. Saller, 487–510. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 2007.Google Scholar

  • Ortu, Rosanna. ‘Aiunt aediles ...’ Dichiarazioni del venditore e vizi della cosa venduta nell’editto de mancipiis emundis vendundis. Turin: Giappichelli, 2008.Google Scholar

  • Paschalidis, Paschalis. “What did iniuria in the lex Aquilia actually mean?” RIDA 55 (2008): 321–363.Google Scholar

  • Perry, Matthew J. Gender, Manumission, and the Roman Freedwoman. New York: Cambridge U. P., 2014.Google Scholar

  • Reduzzi Merola, Francesca. “Schiavi fuggitivi, schiavi rubati, ‘ servi corrupti’.” Studia Historica: Historia Antiqua 25 (2007): 325–329.Google Scholar

  • Richlin, Amy. “Not before homosexuality: the materiality of the cinaedus and the Roman law against love between men.” Journal of the History of Sexuality 3.4 (1993): 523–573.Google Scholar

  • Rodger, Alan. “What did damnum iniuria actually mean?” In Mapping the Law: essays in memory of Peter Birks, edited by Andrew Burrows and Alan Rodger, 421–438. Oxford: Oxford U. P., 2006.Google Scholar

  • Saller, Richard. Patriarchy, Property and Death in the Roman Family. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 1994.Google Scholar

  • Scheidel, Walter. “Human mobility in Roman Italy, II: the slave population.” Journal of Roman Studies 95 (2005): 64–79.Google Scholar

  • Schiller, A. Arthur. “Trade secrets and the Roman law: the actio servi corrupti.” Columbia Law Review 30.6 (1930): 837–845.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stewart, Roberta. Plautus and Roman Slavery. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.Google Scholar

  • Treggiari, Susan. Roman Marriage: iusti coniuges from the time of Cicero to the time of Ulpian. Oxford: Oxford U. P., 1991.Google Scholar

  • Tuori, Kaius. “Revenge and retribution in the twelve tables: talio esto reconsidered.” Fundamina 13.2 (2007): 140–145.Google Scholar

  • Valditara, Giuseppe. Damnum iniuria datum. Second Edition. Turin: Giappichelli, 2005.Google Scholar

  • Valditara, Giuseppe. “Dalla iniuria alla culpa: su una dibattutta questione.” Studia et Documenta Historiae et Iuris 75 (2009): 131–145.Google Scholar

  • Walters, Jonathan. “Invading the body: manliness and impenetrability in Roman thought.” In Roman Sexualities, edited by Judith P. Hallett and Marilyn B. Skinner, 29–43. Princeton: Princeton U. P., 1997.Google Scholar

  • Watson, Alan. “Personal injuries in the XII Tables.” Tijdschrift voor rechsgeschiedenis. Revue d’histoire du droit. The Legal History Review 43 (1975): 213–222.Google Scholar

  • Watson, Alan. Roman Slave Law. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins U. P., 1987.Google Scholar

  • Welch, Katherine. “Subura.” In Lexicon Topographicum Urbis Romae, Vol. IV, edited by E. M. Steinby, 379–383. Rome: Edizioni Quasar, 1999.Google Scholar

  • Williams, Craig. Roman Homosexuality: ideologies of masculinity in classical antiquity. Second Edition. Oxford: Oxford U. P., 2010.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2015-05-29

Published in Print: 2015-06-01


Citation Information: Journal of Ancient History, Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 55–75, ISSN (Online) 2324-8114, ISSN (Print) 2324-8106, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jah-2015-0016.

Export Citation

© 2015 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/München/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in