Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing Research

The Journal of Polish Neural Network Society, the University of Social Sciences in Lodz & Czestochowa University of Technology

4 Issues per year

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Directed Evolution – A New Metaheuristc for Optimization

Corina Rotar
  • Department of Exact and Engineering Sciences, “1 Decembrie 1918” University, Unirii street, no. 15-17, 510109 Alba Iulia, Romania
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Laszlo Barna Iantovics
  • Department of Computer Science, “Petru Maior” University, N. Iorga street, no. 1, 540088, Trgu Mure, Romania
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2017-03-20 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jaiscr-2017-0013


Recently, we have witnessed an infusion of calculating models based on models offered by nature, models with more or less fidelity to the original that have led to the development of various problem-solving computational procedures. Starting from the observation of natural processes at the macroscopic or microscopic level, various methods have been developed. Technological progress today allows the accelerated reproduction of natural phenomena in the laboratory, which is why a new niche has arisen in the landscape of nature-inspired methods. This niche is devoted to the emulation of artificial biological processes in computational problem-solving methods.

This paper proposes a novel approach, which is to develop novel computational methods in the field of Natural Computing based on the semi-natural process, namely Directed Evolution. In the first step we explain Directed Evolution, defined as the artificial reproduction of the process of evolution in the laboratory in order to obtain performing biological entities. For computer scientists, this provide a strong source of inspiration in the search for efficient methods of optimization. The computational model that proposed here largely overlaps with the Directed Evolution protocol, and the results obtained in the numerical experiments confirm the viability of such techniques inspired by processes which are more artificial than natural. The paper describes a novel general algorithm, inspired by Directed Evolution, which is able to solve different optimization problems, such as single optimization, multiobjective optimization and combinatorial optimization problems.

Keywords: optimization; directed evolution; nature-inspired computing


  • [1] Cobb, R. E., Chao, R. and Zhao, H., Directed evolution: Past, present, and future. AIChE Journal, 59, 2013, p. 1432–1440.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [2] Jckel, C., Kast P., and Hilvert D., Protein design by directed evolution, Annu. Rev. Biophys, 37, 2008, p. 153-173.Google Scholar

  • [3] Rubin-Pitel S., et al., Directed evolution tools in bio-product and bioprocess development, In Bioprocessing for Value-Added Products from Renewable Resources: New Technologies and Applications, 2006, p. 49-72.Google Scholar

  • [4] Moreno, P. C., Moreno A. G., and Peuela C. J., Using directed evolution techniques to solve hard combinatorial problems, Proceedings of the Computer Science & Information Technologies Conference. CSIT 2009, p. 225-229.Google Scholar

  • [5] Berlik, S., Directed Evolutionary Algorithms by Means of the Skew-Normal Distribution, In S. Co. 2009 Sixth Conference. Complex Data Modeling and Computationally Intensive Statistical Methods for Estimation and Prediction. Maggioli Editore, 2009, p.67.Google Scholar

  • [6] Rotar, C., Directed Evolution-a Bio-inspired Optimization Technique, Proceedings of International Conference on Theory and Applications in Mathematics and Informatics, Alba Iulia, 2015.Google Scholar

  • [7] Oates M. J., D. W. Corne, and D. B. Kell, The bimodal feature at large population sizes and high selection pressure: implications for directed evolution, Recent Advances in Simulated Evolution and Learning, 2003, p. 215-240.Google Scholar

  • [8] Voigt C. A., et al., Computationally focusing the directed evolution of proteins, Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, 2001, p. 58-63.Google Scholar

  • [9] Yokobayashi, Yohei, et al., .Directed evolution of trypsin inhibiting peptides using a genetic algorithm, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1.20, 1996, p. 2435-2437.Google Scholar

  • [10] Weber L., Applications of genetic algorithms in molecular diversity, Current Opinion in Chemical Biology 2.3, 1998, p. 381-385.Google Scholar

  • [11] Arnold F. H., Design by directed evolution, Accounts of chemical research 31.3, 1998, p. 125-131.Google Scholar

  • [12] Cadwell R. C., and Gerald F. J., Randomization of genes by PCR mutagenesis, Genome research 2.1, 1992, p. 28-33.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [13] Stemmer W. PC., Rapid evolution of a protein in vitro by DNA shuffling, Nature 370.6488, 1994, p. 389-391.Google Scholar

  • [14] Gartner Z. J., Evolutionary approaches for the discovery of functional synthetic small molecules, Pure and applied chemistry 78.1 2006, p. 1-14.Google Scholar

  • [15] Biyani M., et al., Evolutionary Molecular Engineering to Efficiently Direct in vitro Protein Synthesis, CELL-FREE PROTEIN SYNTHESIS, 2012, p. 51.Google Scholar

  • [16] Park S. J., and Cochran J. R., eds. Protein engineering and design. Vol. 75. CRC press, 2009.Google Scholar

  • [17] Darwin Ch., and Beer G., The origin of species. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1951.Google Scholar

  • [18] Fisher R. A., The genetical theory of natural selection., 1958, available online at https://archive.org

  • [19] Huxley J., Evolution. The Modern Synthesis, 1942. available online at www.ehudlamm.com/huxley.pdf

  • [20] Zitzler E., et al., Performance assessment of multiobjective optimizers: An analysis and review. Evolutionary Computation, IEEE Transactions on, 7(2), 2003, p. 117-132.Google Scholar

  • [21] Zitzler E., Deb, K., Thiele, L., Comparison of Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms: Empirical Results, Evolutionary Computation, vol. 8 no, 2, 2000, p. 173-195.Google Scholar

  • [22] Deb K., et al., A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6 (2), 2002, pp. 182-197.Google Scholar

  • [23] Shi, Y. and Eberhart, R., A modified particle swarm optimizer, In Evolutionary Computation Proceedings, IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence., 1998, pp. 69-73.Google Scholar

  • [24] Pisinger D., Where are the hard knapsack problems?, Computers & Operations Research 32.9, 2005, p. 2271-2284.Google Scholar

  • [25] De Castro, L.N., Fundamentals of natural computing: basic concepts, algorithms, and applications. CRC Press, 2006.Google Scholar

  • [26] Mitchell, M. An introduction to genetic algorithms. MIT press, 1998.Google Scholar

  • [27] Dorigo M., Birattari M., and Stutzle T., Ant colony optimization, Computational Intelligence Magazine, IEEE 1.4, 2006, p. 28-39.Google Scholar

  • [28] De Castro L.N., and Timmis J., Artificial immune systems: a new computational intelligence approach, Springer Science & Business Media, 2002.Google Scholar

  • [29] Wilkins M. R. et al., From proteins to proteomes: large scale protein identification by two-dimensional electrophoresis and amino acid analysis, BioTechnology 14, 1996, p. 61–65.Google Scholar

  • [30] Adorio E. P., Diliman U., MVF-Multivariate Test Functions Library in C for Unconstrained Global Optimization, 2005, available online at http://www.geocities.ws/eadorio.

About the article

Received: 2016-03-12

Accepted: 2016-10-27

Published Online: 2017-03-20

Published in Print: 2017-07-01

Citation Information: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing Research, Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages 183–200, ISSN (Online) 2083-2567, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jaiscr-2017-0013.

Export Citation

© 2017 Academy of Management (SWSPiZ), Lodz. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in