Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton August 11, 2005

The exceptional morphology of Tura numerals and restrictors: Endoclitics, infixes and pseudowords

  • Dmitry Idiatov

Abstract

This paper offers a comprehensive account of the exceptional morphosyntactic behaviour of Tura numerals. It explores the ability of the roots of Tura numerals to be split up by the so-called “intensifiers”, or better “restrictors”, which, remarkably, are neither affixes nor clitics in other contexts. This typologically rare phenomenon proves to have interesting implications for morphology, syntax and pragmatics. I claim that some of these constructions result from conventionalization and subsequent univerbation of certain pragmatically marked collocations. The others are a product of reanalysis by analogy that occurred in one specific syntactic environment. The need for an adequate synchronic morphological analysis of the constructions at issue made it necessary to address some theoretical questions, such as endoclisis, word integrity, and constancy of the morphological status of linguistic entities. In most cases when restrictors are used in a numeral-internal position, they are claimed to be infixed roots or infixes. In addition, the notion of “pseudoword(form)” is proposed to account for some of the facts attested. The typologically highly interesting category of restrictors is also examined in detail from syntactic, semantic, etymological and morphological perspectives.

:
Published Online: 2005-08-11
Published in Print: 2005-07-20

Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG

Downloaded on 28.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jall.2005.26.1.31/html
Scroll to top button