Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of African Languages and Linguistics

Ed. by Ameka, Felix K. / Amha, Azeb

2 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.071
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.171

CiteScore 2016: 0.33

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.159
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 1.119

Online
ISSN
1613-3811
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 35, Issue 1 (May 2014)

Issues

Benefactive and substitutive applicatives in Bemba

Lutz Marten
  • Corresponding author
  • Faculty of Languages and Cultures, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, UK
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Nancy C. Kula
Published Online: 2014-05-10 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jall-2014-0001

Abstract

Benefactive applicative constructions can encode a range of different meanings, including notably recipient, substitutive and plain benefactive readings, which are often distinguished in cross-linguistic studies. In Bantu languages, this distinction has not received much attention, in part because most Bantu languages do not formally distinguish between different readings of benefactive applicatives. In Bemba (Bantu M42, Zambia), by contrast, substitutive applicatives, where the action of the verb is performed by the agent instead of, on behalf of, or in place of someone else, are formally marked by applicative morphology in addition to a post-verbal clitic -kó, based on a grammaticalised locative demonstrative clitic. The paper provides a detailed discussion of the construction and proposes that the interpretation of substitutive applicatives results from the interaction of abstract applicative and locative semantics and depends on underlying metaphors of spatial and abstract location. Bemba benefactive applicatives thus provide an illustration of the complex function and interpretation of Bantu applicatives and locative markers more widely. The construction is interesting from a historical-comparative and typological perspective because of the particular grammaticalisation process from a locative source involved in the historical development of the construction, and because substitution is marked in addition to applicative marking.

Keywords: Bemba; substitutive applicative; Bantu; spatial metaphor; locative grammaticalisation; argument structure; valency change

About the article

Published Online: 2014-05-10

Published in Print: 2014-05-01


Citation Information: Journal of African Languages and Linguistics, ISSN (Online) 1613-3811, ISSN (Print) 0167-6164, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jall-2014-0001.

Export Citation

©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Nancy C Kula and Bettina Braun
Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 2015, Volume 33, Number 3, Page 307
[2]
Nancy C. Kula and Lee S. Bickmore
Phonology, 2015, Volume 32, Number 01, Page 147

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in