Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of African Languages and Linguistics

Ed. by Ameka, Felix K. / Amha, Azeb

2 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.071
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.171

CiteScore 2016: 0.33

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.159
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 1.119

Online
ISSN
1613-3811
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 39, Issue 1

Issues

The background marker in Barayin

Joseph Lovestrand
Published Online: 2018-04-26 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jall-2018-0001

Abstract

This article gives a first account of the background marker in Barayin, an East Chadic language spoken in the Guera region of Chad. The article describes the marker’s syntactic distribution and the semantic and pragmatic contexts it occurs in. It commonly occurs following a sentence-initial noun phrase or adverbial, and it also commonly follows a sentence-initial dependent clause such as a conditional clause. The material preceding is background information which provides a context for the interpretation of the following proposition, which is the main point of the communication.

Keywords: information structure; background; Chadic; topic; focus

References

  • Ameka, Felix. 1991. How discourse particles mean: The case of the Ewe terminal particles. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 12(2). 143–170.Google Scholar

  • Boujol & Clupot. 1941. La subdivision de Melfi. Bulletin de la Sociètè des recherches congolaises XXVIII. 13–82.Google Scholar

  • Chafe, William. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects and topics. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 27–55. Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • Chafe, William. 1987. Cognitive constraints on information flow. In Russell S. Tomlin (ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse: Outcome of a symposium, Eugene, Or., June 1984, 21–52. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Creissels, Denis, Sokhna Bao Diop, Alain-Christian Bassne, Mame Thierno Cissé, Alexander Cobbinah, El Hadji Dieye, Dame Ndao, Sylvie Nouguier-Voisin, Nicolas Quint, Marie Renaudier, Adjaratou Sall & Guillame Segerer. 2015. L’impersonnalitè dans les langues de la région sénégambienne. Africana Linguistica 21. 29–86.Google Scholar

  • Cysouw, Michael. 2005. Morphology in the wrong place: A survey of preposed enclitics. In Wolfgang U. Dressler, Dieter Kastovsky & Oscar E. Pfeiffer (eds.), Morphology and its demarcations selected papers from the 11th Morphology Meeting, Vienna, February 2004, 17–38. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • Dik, Simon C. 1981. Functional grammar (Publications in Sciences Language 7). Dordrecht, Holland; Cinnaminson, USA: Foris Publications, 3rd edn.

  • Dooley, Robert A. & Stephen H. Levinsohn. 2001. Analyzing discourse: A manual of basic concepts. Dallas, Tex: SIL International.

  • Fluckiger, Cheryl A. & Annie H. Whaley. 1983. Four discourse particles in Mandara. In Studies in Chadic and Afroasiatic linguistics: Papers from the International Colloquium on the Chadic Language Family and the Symposium on Chadic within Afroasiatic, at the University of Hamburg, September 14–18,1981, 277–285. Hamburg: H. Buske.

  • Frajzyngier, Zygmunt. 1996. Grammaticalization of the complex sentence: A case study in Chadic. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Frajzyngier, Zygmunt. 2001. A grammar of Lele. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar

  • Frajzyngier, Zygmunt. 2002. A grammar of Hdi. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Frajzyngier, Zygmunt. 2008. A grammar of Gidar. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

  • Frajzyngier, Zygmunt. 2012. A grammar of Wandala. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

  • Gimba, A. Maina. 2005. On the functions of ‘ye’ in Bole. Paper presented at the International Conference on Focus in African Languages, Berlin, 6-8 October 2005.Google Scholar

  • Givón, Talmy. 1990. Syntax: A functional-typological introduction, vol. 2. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Givón, Talmy. 2001. Syntax: An introduction, vol. 2. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: J. Benjamins.

  • Gravina, Richard. 2003. Topic and focus in Mbuko discourse. Yaoundé, Cameroon: SIL.

  • Güldemann, Tom. 2010. The relation between focus and theticity in the Tuu family. In Ines Fiedler & Anne Schwarz (eds.), The expression of information structure: A documentation of its diversity across Africa. Typological Studies in Language, 69–93. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.

  • Güldemann, Tom. 2016. Maximal backgrounding = focus without (necessary) focus encoding. Studies in Language 30. 551–590.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Haiman, John. 1978. Conditionals are topics. Language 54(3). 564–589.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Haller, Beat & John Watters. 1984. Topic in Zulgo. Studies in African Linguistics 15(1). 27–46.

  • Haspelmath, Martin. 2003. The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, vol. 2, 211–242. Psychology Press.

  • Heller, Daphna & Lynsey Wolter. 2008. That is Rosa: Identificational sentences as intensional predication. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 12. 226–240.Google Scholar

  • Higgins, F. Roger. 1973. The pseudo-cleft construction in English. MIT PhD dissertation.

  • Hollingsworth, Kenneth R. 1985. Marked topic in Mofu-Gudur. Yaoundé, Cameroon: SIL.

  • Hollingsworth, Kenneth R & Charles Peck. 1992. Topics in Mofu-Gudur. In Shin Ja J Hwang & William R Merrifield (eds.), Language in Context, Essays for Robert E. Longacre, 109–125. Dallas, Tex.: SIL & University of Texas at Arlingon.

  • Jacob, Peggy. 2010. On the obligatoriness of focus marking. In Ines Fiedler & Anne Schwarz (eds.), The expression of information structure: A documentation of its diversity across Africa. Typological Studies in Language, 117–144. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.

  • Kinnaird, William J. 1999. The topic marker ’di’ in Ouldeme. Yaoundé, Cameroon: SIL.

  • Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge studies in Linguistics. Cambridge; New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.

  • Levinsohn, Stephen H. 2012. Self-instruction materials on narrative discourse analysis. Dallas, Tex.: SIL International.

  • Longacre, Robert E. & Shin Ja Joo Hwang. 2012. Holistic discourse analysis. Dallas, Texas: SIL International.Google Scholar

  • Lovestrand, Joseph. 2012. The linguistic structure of Baraϊn (Chadic). Dallas, TX Graduate Institute of Applied Linguistics MA thesis.

  • Moltmann, Friederike. 2013. Identificational sentences. Natural Language Semantics 21(1). 43–77.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Newman, Paul. 2006. Comparative Chadic revisited. In Paul Newman & Larry Hyman (eds.), West African linguistics: Papers in honor of Russell G. Schuh, 188–202. Columbus: Ohio State University.

  • Pohlig, Annie Whaley & James N. Pohlig. 1994. Further thoughts of four discourse particles in Mandara. In Stephen H. Levinsohn (ed.), Discourse features of ten languages of West-Central Africa, 211–221. SIL & University of Texas at Arlingon.

  • Scherrer, Elaine Marie. 2012. An overview of Gemzek narrative discourse features. Yaoundé, Cameroon: SIL.

  • Schuh, Russell. 1972. Aspects of Ngizim syntax. Los Angeles: UCLA PhD.

  • Schuh, Russell. 2003. Chadic overview. In Gábor Takács, David Appleyard & M. Lionel Bender (eds.), Selected comparative-historical Afrasian linguistic studies in memory of Igor M. Diakonoff, 55–60. Munich: Lincom Europa.

  • Schuh, Russell G. 2005. Yobe State, Nigeria as a linguistic area. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 77–94.Google Scholar

  • Seiler, W. 1983. Topic marking in the Papuan language of Imonda. Oceanic Linguistics 22/23(1/2). 151–173.

  • Smith, Tony. 2003. Definiteness, topicalisation and theme: Muyang narrative discourse markers. Yaoundé, Cameroon: SIL.

  • Thompson, Sandra & Robert Longacre. 1985. Adverbial clauses. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description: Complex constructions, vol. 2, 171–234. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Viljoen, Melanie. 2013. A grammatical description of the Buwal language: La Trobe University PhD dissertation.

  • Viljoen, Melanie. 2015. Buwal narrative discourse. Yaoundé, Cameroon: SIL.

  • de Vries, Lourens. 1995. Demonstratives, referent identification and topicality in Wambon and some other Papuan languages. Journal of Pragmatics 24(5). 513–533.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Weil, Henri. 1844. L’ordre des mots dans les langues anciennes comparées aux langues modernes. Paris: Joubert.

  • Wolff, Ekkehard. 1983. A grammar of the Lamang language. Glückstadt: Verlag J.J. Augustin.

  • Wolff, H. Ekkehard. 2015. The Lamang language and dictionary, vol. 1. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.

  • Zimmermann, Malte. 2011. The grammatical expression of focus in West Chadic: Variation and uniformity in and across languages. Linguistics 49(5). 1163–1213.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-04-26

Published in Print: 2018-05-25


Citation Information: Journal of African Languages and Linguistics, Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages 1–39, ISSN (Online) 1613-3811, ISSN (Print) 0167-6164, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jall-2018-0001.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in