Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of African Languages and Linguistics

Ed. by Ameka, Felix K. / Amha, Azeb

2 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.800

CiteScore 2017: 0.76

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.327
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.126

Online
ISSN
1613-3811
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 39, Issue 2

Issues

The structure of Argobba nominal phrase

Amare Getahun
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Amharic Language, Literature and Folklore, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2018-11-09 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jall-2018-0007

Abstract

This paper analyzes the internal structure of Argobba nominal phrase in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar (HPSG) formalism. Argobba is a seriously endangered Semitic language in Ethiopia. Unlike its sister languages in the Ethio-Semitic subfamily, Argobba nouns qualified by a demonstrative, possessive pronoun and genitive NP bear a definite article. It is argued in this paper that the definite article is not an independent syntactic element, but an affix, which is attached to indefinite nouns lexically. It is argued that the derivation of Argobba definite common nouns is captured by the Definite Lexical Rule (DLR). The paper also claims that the NP internal agreement of specifiers and modifiers with the head noun is accounted for by the SPEC and MOD features that impose certain constraints on the morphosyntactic features of the head noun.

Keywords: Semitic; nominal; lexeme; stem; root endangered; HPSG

References

  • Beermann, Dorothee & Ephrem Binyam. 2007. The definite article and possessive marking in Amharic. In Frederick Hoyt, Nikki Seifert, Alexandra Teodorescu, Jessica White & Stephen Wechsler (eds.), Texas linguistic society 9, 21–33. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar

  • den Dikken, Marcel. 2007. Amharic relatives and possessives: Definiteness, agreement and the linker. Linguistic Inquiry 38. 302–320.Google Scholar

  • Getahun, Amare. 2009. Argobba verb morphology and syntax: A documentation with HPSG analytic framework. Trondheim: NTNU, dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Getahun, Amare. 2010. Argobba passive: An HPSG account. Journal of Ethiopian Studies XXXII(1). 1–29.Google Scholar

  • Getahun, Amare. 2015. Argobba regional varieties. Paper presented at the 2nd National Conference on Language, Literature, Culture and Communications, Bahir Dar University.Google Scholar

  • Jackendoff, R.S. 1977. X-bar Syntax: The study of phrase structure. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Kramer, Ruth. 2010. The Amharic definite marker and the syntax-morphology interface. Syntax 13. 196–240.Google Scholar

  • Leslau, W. 1997. Ethiopic documents: Argobba grammar and dictionary. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

  • Pollard, C. & I. Sag. 1994. Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar

  • Sag, Ivan, Thomas Wasow & Emily Bender. 2003. Syntactic theory: A formal introduction. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar

  • Yimam, Baye. 1988. ‘Towards a definition of nominal specifiers in Amharic. In Taddese Beyene (ed.), Proceedings of the eigth international conference of Ethiopian studies. Institute of Ethiopian Studies, Addis Ababa University, 599–613.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-11-09

Published in Print: 2018-11-06


Citation Information: Journal of African Languages and Linguistics, Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages 127–151, ISSN (Online) 1613-3811, ISSN (Print) 0167-6164, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jall-2018-0007.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in